Mary Jeghers, Miriam Monahan, James Wersal, Sherrilene Classen
{"title":"使用 DriveSafety 250 模拟器评估驾驶错误的评分者可靠性。","authors":"Mary Jeghers, Miriam Monahan, James Wersal, Sherrilene Classen","doi":"10.1080/07380577.2022.2031370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to establish inter-rater reliability among three raters while training new driver rehabilitation specialists to correctly identify driving errors on a DriveSafety 250 driving simulator. Five participants completed adaptation, residential and suburban, and city and highway scenarios. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated scores between .623-.877 (<i>p</i> = .003-.122) for the total driving errors recorded in the two scenario drives with rater agreement initially ranging between 7-8%. When analyzing the data for types of driving errors, the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from .556-.973 (<i>p</i> < .05) and rater agreement between 15-100%. Through proper training and strategy development, raters reached 100% consensus on all aspects of inter-rater reliability while assessing driving errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":46157,"journal":{"name":"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rater-Reliability of Assessing Driving Errors with a DriveSafety 250 Simulator.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Jeghers, Miriam Monahan, James Wersal, Sherrilene Classen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07380577.2022.2031370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to establish inter-rater reliability among three raters while training new driver rehabilitation specialists to correctly identify driving errors on a DriveSafety 250 driving simulator. Five participants completed adaptation, residential and suburban, and city and highway scenarios. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated scores between .623-.877 (<i>p</i> = .003-.122) for the total driving errors recorded in the two scenario drives with rater agreement initially ranging between 7-8%. When analyzing the data for types of driving errors, the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from .556-.973 (<i>p</i> < .05) and rater agreement between 15-100%. Through proper training and strategy development, raters reached 100% consensus on all aspects of inter-rater reliability while assessing driving errors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2022.2031370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2022.2031370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rater-Reliability of Assessing Driving Errors with a DriveSafety 250 Simulator.
This study aimed to establish inter-rater reliability among three raters while training new driver rehabilitation specialists to correctly identify driving errors on a DriveSafety 250 driving simulator. Five participants completed adaptation, residential and suburban, and city and highway scenarios. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated scores between .623-.877 (p = .003-.122) for the total driving errors recorded in the two scenario drives with rater agreement initially ranging between 7-8%. When analyzing the data for types of driving errors, the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from .556-.973 (p < .05) and rater agreement between 15-100%. Through proper training and strategy development, raters reached 100% consensus on all aspects of inter-rater reliability while assessing driving errors.
期刊介绍：
Occupational Therapy in Health Care is a journal of contemporary practice in occupational therapy. It provides occupational therapy practitioners with a forum to stay up-to-date on current methods and theories in the field. Focused on everyday practice, the journal addresses the concerns of new and experienced therapists, presenting innovations in client evaluations and treatments, current research findings, critical reviews of current textbooks, descriptions of novel programs and descriptions of fieldwork innovations. An essential guide to the changing trends in health care, social services, and education, Occupational Therapy in Health Care provides occupational therapy practitioners with a forum to stay up-to-date on current methods and theories in the field.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
