{"title":"税收政策对沙特阿拉伯烟草消费的影响。","authors":"Hawazin Fahad Alotaibi, Nasser Abdullah Alsanea","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2022.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Taxes on tobacco products that increase the price and target demand-reduction have been shown to be an efficient means of reducing tobacco consumption. A new policy introduced in 2017 has increased the price of a 20-cigarette pack of the most popular brand to 27.50 SAR (7.33 USD) with the tax portion being 68.09%, which is within the yardstick recommended by the World Bank. OBJECTIVE: Assess impact of taxes on cigarette consumption. DESIGN: Retrospective econometric analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The annual importation of cigarettes containing tobacco (commodity code 24022000) in metric tons (as a proxy measure of consumption). METHODS: An econometric analysis of cigarette prices and consumption was performed using the methods of the World Bank Economics of Tobacco Toolkit. The impact was assessed statistically through price elasticity of cigarette demand. The study used yearly data for the period 2013-2019 to compare the price elasticity of demand according to the change in price. Cigarette consumption was equated to cigarette imports (dependent variable), and correlation with the cigarette price, income, education, and unemployment was assessed as independent variables of interest. RESULTS: Annual importation of cigarettes declined by 27.41% for the period 2013-2019 after the imposition of ad valorem and value-added taxes in 2017 and 2018, respectively. The price of a pack of cigarettes increased by 115.1% from 2016 to 2018. The per capita consumption was inversely correlated with price *P=.0003285, r=-0.969). The inverse correlation between income and per capita consumption was also statistically significant (P=.025, r=-0.816). Education did not correlate with per capita consumption (P=.740, r=-0.155), but unemployment was inversely correlated (P=.008, r=-0.884). From 2016 to 2018, the price elasticity of demand became negative with respect to income as recommended by the World Health Organization. The price elasticity of demand reached -0.07, -0.8, -0.93 in 2016, 2017, 2018, respectively. CONCLUSION: The modification of tax policy in 2017 has resulted in a decrease in both cigarette affordability and consumption. An additional 42.67% increase in the price, or pack price of 35.81 SAR (9.54 USD) might offset the increase in individual income noted in 2019 and maintain the decreased affordability. LIMITATIONS: The lack of more granular data on cigarette sales and more reliable data on prevalence. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.","PeriodicalId":8016,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","volume":"42 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/96/0256-4947.2022.1.PMC8812158.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of taxation policy on tobacco consumption in Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Hawazin Fahad Alotaibi, Nasser Abdullah Alsanea\",\"doi\":\"10.5144/0256-4947.2022.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Taxes on tobacco products that increase the price and target demand-reduction have been shown to be an efficient means of reducing tobacco consumption. A new policy introduced in 2017 has increased the price of a 20-cigarette pack of the most popular brand to 27.50 SAR (7.33 USD) with the tax portion being 68.09%, which is within the yardstick recommended by the World Bank. OBJECTIVE: Assess impact of taxes on cigarette consumption. DESIGN: Retrospective econometric analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The annual importation of cigarettes containing tobacco (commodity code 24022000) in metric tons (as a proxy measure of consumption). METHODS: An econometric analysis of cigarette prices and consumption was performed using the methods of the World Bank Economics of Tobacco Toolkit. The impact was assessed statistically through price elasticity of cigarette demand. The study used yearly data for the period 2013-2019 to compare the price elasticity of demand according to the change in price. Cigarette consumption was equated to cigarette imports (dependent variable), and correlation with the cigarette price, income, education, and unemployment was assessed as independent variables of interest. RESULTS: Annual importation of cigarettes declined by 27.41% for the period 2013-2019 after the imposition of ad valorem and value-added taxes in 2017 and 2018, respectively. The price of a pack of cigarettes increased by 115.1% from 2016 to 2018. The per capita consumption was inversely correlated with price *P=.0003285, r=-0.969). The inverse correlation between income and per capita consumption was also statistically significant (P=.025, r=-0.816). Education did not correlate with per capita consumption (P=.740, r=-0.155), but unemployment was inversely correlated (P=.008, r=-0.884). From 2016 to 2018, the price elasticity of demand became negative with respect to income as recommended by the World Health Organization. The price elasticity of demand reached -0.07, -0.8, -0.93 in 2016, 2017, 2018, respectively. CONCLUSION: The modification of tax policy in 2017 has resulted in a decrease in both cigarette affordability and consumption. An additional 42.67% increase in the price, or pack price of 35.81 SAR (9.54 USD) might offset the increase in individual income noted in 2019 and maintain the decreased affordability. LIMITATIONS: The lack of more granular data on cigarette sales and more reliable data on prevalence. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Saudi Medicine\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/96/0256-4947.2022.1.PMC8812158.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Saudi Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2022.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2022.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
背景:对烟草制品征税以提高价格和减少目标需求已被证明是减少烟草消费的有效手段。2017年出台的一项新政策将最受欢迎品牌的20包香烟的价格提高到27.50里亚尔(7.33美元),税率为68.09%,符合世界银行建议的标准。目的:评估税收对卷烟消费的影响。设计:回顾性计量经济学分析。主要成果措施:含烟草(商品代码24022000)的卷烟年进口量,以公吨为单位(作为消费的替代衡量标准)。方法:使用世界银行烟草经济学工具包的方法对卷烟价格和消费进行计量经济学分析。通过卷烟需求的价格弹性对影响进行了统计评估。该研究使用了2013-2019年的年度数据,根据价格变化比较需求的价格弹性。香烟消费等同于香烟进口(因变量),与香烟价格、收入、教育和失业的相关性被评估为感兴趣的自变量。结果:在2017年和2018年分别征收从价税和增值税后,2013-2019年期间卷烟年进口量下降了27.41%。从2016年到2018年,一包香烟的价格上涨了115.1%。人均消费量与价格呈负相关*P=。0003285, r = -0.969)。收入与人均消费之间的负相关也具有统计学意义(P=。025年,r = -0.816)。教育程度与人均消费没有相关性(P=。740, r=-0.155),但失业率呈负相关(P=。008年,r = -0.884)。根据世界卫生组织的建议,从2016年到2018年,需求的价格弹性相对于收入为负。2016年、2017年、2018年需求价格弹性分别为-0.07、-0.8、-0.93。结论:2017年税收政策的调整导致卷烟可负担性和消费量双双下降。价格额外上涨42.67%,或包装价格为35.81里亚尔(9.54美元),可能会抵消2019年个人收入的增长,并维持下降的负担能力。局限性:缺乏更细粒度的卷烟销售数据和更可靠的流行数据。利益冲突:无。
Impact of taxation policy on tobacco consumption in Saudi Arabia.
BACKGROUND: Taxes on tobacco products that increase the price and target demand-reduction have been shown to be an efficient means of reducing tobacco consumption. A new policy introduced in 2017 has increased the price of a 20-cigarette pack of the most popular brand to 27.50 SAR (7.33 USD) with the tax portion being 68.09%, which is within the yardstick recommended by the World Bank. OBJECTIVE: Assess impact of taxes on cigarette consumption. DESIGN: Retrospective econometric analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The annual importation of cigarettes containing tobacco (commodity code 24022000) in metric tons (as a proxy measure of consumption). METHODS: An econometric analysis of cigarette prices and consumption was performed using the methods of the World Bank Economics of Tobacco Toolkit. The impact was assessed statistically through price elasticity of cigarette demand. The study used yearly data for the period 2013-2019 to compare the price elasticity of demand according to the change in price. Cigarette consumption was equated to cigarette imports (dependent variable), and correlation with the cigarette price, income, education, and unemployment was assessed as independent variables of interest. RESULTS: Annual importation of cigarettes declined by 27.41% for the period 2013-2019 after the imposition of ad valorem and value-added taxes in 2017 and 2018, respectively. The price of a pack of cigarettes increased by 115.1% from 2016 to 2018. The per capita consumption was inversely correlated with price *P=.0003285, r=-0.969). The inverse correlation between income and per capita consumption was also statistically significant (P=.025, r=-0.816). Education did not correlate with per capita consumption (P=.740, r=-0.155), but unemployment was inversely correlated (P=.008, r=-0.884). From 2016 to 2018, the price elasticity of demand became negative with respect to income as recommended by the World Health Organization. The price elasticity of demand reached -0.07, -0.8, -0.93 in 2016, 2017, 2018, respectively. CONCLUSION: The modification of tax policy in 2017 has resulted in a decrease in both cigarette affordability and consumption. An additional 42.67% increase in the price, or pack price of 35.81 SAR (9.54 USD) might offset the increase in individual income noted in 2019 and maintain the decreased affordability. LIMITATIONS: The lack of more granular data on cigarette sales and more reliable data on prevalence. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Saudi Medicine (ASM) is published bimonthly by King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We publish scientific reports of clinical interest in English. All submissions are subject to peer review by the editorial board and by reviewers in appropriate specialties. The journal will consider for publication manuscripts from any part of the world, but particularly reports that would be of interest to readers in the Middle East or other parts of Asia and Africa. Please go to the Author Resource Center for additional information.