评估双相情感障碍自我管理在线资源的可理解性、可操作性和质量。

The Mental Health Clinician Pub Date : 2022-01-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.9740/mhc.2022.01.001
Nathan D Sutera, Courtney A Iuppa, Leigh Anne Nelson, Carrie R Kriz, Nicole A Gramlich, Shelby E Lang, Ellie S R Elliott, Roger W Sommi
{"title":"评估双相情感障碍自我管理在线资源的可理解性、可操作性和质量。","authors":"Nathan D Sutera,&nbsp;Courtney A Iuppa,&nbsp;Leigh Anne Nelson,&nbsp;Carrie R Kriz,&nbsp;Nicole A Gramlich,&nbsp;Shelby E Lang,&nbsp;Ellie S R Elliott,&nbsp;Roger W Sommi","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2022.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to assess the understandability, actionability, and quality of online resources for the self-management (SM) of bipolar spectrum disorders in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online search using Google, Bing, and Yahoo! search engines was conducted to identify resources for bipolar disorder. Those that were published in English, discussed at least 1 method directed at improving an SM task, and were within the first 25 nonadvertisement results for each search were included. Resources directed specifically at adolescents were excluded. Understandability and actionability of the online resources were evaluated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Quality of the online resources was evaluated using the DISCERN instrument. The number of SM tasks each resource discussed was also evaluated. Overall mean appropriateness was calculated by averaging the percentage scores of understandability, actionability, and quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two resources were included. The mean sample scores were 8.4 (SD, 2.1; range, 2-13; maximum, 15) for understandability, 2.2 (SD, 1.2; range, 0-4; maximum, 5) for actionability, and 46.1 (SD, 8.9; range, 30-57; maximum, 75) for quality. The overall mean appropriateness percentage was 53.5% (SD, 11.7%; range, 18%-77%), with a goal of at least 70%. Included resources addressed a mean of 7.1 tasks (SD, 2.5; range, 1-14; maximum, 20).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Most online resources for the SM of bipolar disorder scored poorly for understandability and actionability based on PEMAT scores and had low to moderate scores for quality using the DISCERN instrument. Future online resources should be designed with the goal of increasing appropriateness for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/56/i2168-9709-12-1-1.PMC8788304.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the understandability, actionability, and quality of online resources for the self-management of bipolar disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan D Sutera,&nbsp;Courtney A Iuppa,&nbsp;Leigh Anne Nelson,&nbsp;Carrie R Kriz,&nbsp;Nicole A Gramlich,&nbsp;Shelby E Lang,&nbsp;Ellie S R Elliott,&nbsp;Roger W Sommi\",\"doi\":\"10.9740/mhc.2022.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to assess the understandability, actionability, and quality of online resources for the self-management (SM) of bipolar spectrum disorders in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online search using Google, Bing, and Yahoo! search engines was conducted to identify resources for bipolar disorder. Those that were published in English, discussed at least 1 method directed at improving an SM task, and were within the first 25 nonadvertisement results for each search were included. Resources directed specifically at adolescents were excluded. Understandability and actionability of the online resources were evaluated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Quality of the online resources was evaluated using the DISCERN instrument. The number of SM tasks each resource discussed was also evaluated. Overall mean appropriateness was calculated by averaging the percentage scores of understandability, actionability, and quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two resources were included. The mean sample scores were 8.4 (SD, 2.1; range, 2-13; maximum, 15) for understandability, 2.2 (SD, 1.2; range, 0-4; maximum, 5) for actionability, and 46.1 (SD, 8.9; range, 30-57; maximum, 75) for quality. The overall mean appropriateness percentage was 53.5% (SD, 11.7%; range, 18%-77%), with a goal of at least 70%. Included resources addressed a mean of 7.1 tasks (SD, 2.5; range, 1-14; maximum, 20).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Most online resources for the SM of bipolar disorder scored poorly for understandability and actionability based on PEMAT scores and had low to moderate scores for quality using the DISCERN instrument. Future online resources should be designed with the goal of increasing appropriateness for patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Mental Health Clinician\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/56/i2168-9709-12-1-1.PMC8788304.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Mental Health Clinician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2022.01.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Mental Health Clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2022.01.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

简介:本研究旨在评估成人双相情感障碍自我管理(SM)在线资源的可理解性、可操作性和质量。方法:使用Google, Bing和Yahoo!使用搜索引擎来确定双相情感障碍的资源。那些用英文发表的,讨论了至少一种改进SM任务的方法,并且在每个搜索的前25个非广告结果中被包括在内的内容。专门针对青少年的资源被排除在外。使用患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)评估在线资源的可理解性和可操作性。使用DISCERN工具评估在线资源的质量。还对讨论的每个资源的SM任务数量进行了评估。总体平均适当性是通过平均可理解性、可操作性和质量的百分比分数来计算的。结果:纳入52个资源。样本平均得分为8.4 (SD, 2.1;范围,2 - 13;可理解性,最大15),2.2 (SD, 1.2;范围0 - 4;可操作性最高为5),46.1(标准差8.9;30-57范围;最高75)的质量。总体平均适宜性百分比为53.5% (SD, 11.7%;范围:18%-77%),目标至少为70%。包括的资源平均涉及7.1个任务(SD, 2.5;范围1 - 14;最大,20)。讨论:大多数关于双相情感障碍SM的在线资源在基于PEMAT评分的可理解性和可操作性方面得分较低,并且在使用DISCERN工具的质量方面得分较低至中等。未来的在线资源应该以增加对患者的适宜性为目标来设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the understandability, actionability, and quality of online resources for the self-management of bipolar disorder.

Introduction: This study aims to assess the understandability, actionability, and quality of online resources for the self-management (SM) of bipolar spectrum disorders in adults.

Methods: An online search using Google, Bing, and Yahoo! search engines was conducted to identify resources for bipolar disorder. Those that were published in English, discussed at least 1 method directed at improving an SM task, and were within the first 25 nonadvertisement results for each search were included. Resources directed specifically at adolescents were excluded. Understandability and actionability of the online resources were evaluated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Quality of the online resources was evaluated using the DISCERN instrument. The number of SM tasks each resource discussed was also evaluated. Overall mean appropriateness was calculated by averaging the percentage scores of understandability, actionability, and quality.

Results: Fifty-two resources were included. The mean sample scores were 8.4 (SD, 2.1; range, 2-13; maximum, 15) for understandability, 2.2 (SD, 1.2; range, 0-4; maximum, 5) for actionability, and 46.1 (SD, 8.9; range, 30-57; maximum, 75) for quality. The overall mean appropriateness percentage was 53.5% (SD, 11.7%; range, 18%-77%), with a goal of at least 70%. Included resources addressed a mean of 7.1 tasks (SD, 2.5; range, 1-14; maximum, 20).

Discussion: Most online resources for the SM of bipolar disorder scored poorly for understandability and actionability based on PEMAT scores and had low to moderate scores for quality using the DISCERN instrument. Future online resources should be designed with the goal of increasing appropriateness for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring real-world symptom impact and improvement in well-being domains for tardive dyskinesia in VMAT2 inhibitor-treated patients via clinician survey and chart review Impact of Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists on improving urinary tract infection antibiotic appropriateness at an acute psychiatric hospital Barriers to access to psychiatric medications in Missouri county jails Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports Intranasal ketamine as a treatment for psychiatric complications of long COVID: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1