法医尸检实践中的“七大错误”:意大利语境。

Q4 Medicine Academic Forensic Pathology Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-09 DOI:10.1177/19253621211056191
Roberto Scendoni, Piergiorgio Fedeli, Nunzia Cannovo, Mariano Cingolani
{"title":"法医尸检实践中的“七大错误”:意大利语境。","authors":"Roberto Scendoni,&nbsp;Piergiorgio Fedeli,&nbsp;Nunzia Cannovo,&nbsp;Mariano Cingolani","doi":"10.1177/19253621211056191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to the Italian legal system, forensic autopsies are performed by a medical doctor specialized in legal medicine, otherwise known as a medicolegal expert (MLE), who has a range of very complex responsibilities. Indeed, the quality of forensic autopsy activity is always questioned in courts of law; incorrect assessments are dangerous because they can jeopardize the validity of a criminal investigation and thus affect the outcome so that a real culprit may be acquitted or an innocent person convicted. Nonconformities also discredit the professionalism of the specialist who performs the autopsy. The work of a MLE implies a series of assignments and duties that should be given constant consideration, but when certain aspects of this activity are underestimated or overlooked, this can lead the expert to make mistakes with irreparable consequences for the judicial investigation. In this article, for the first time, we present a summary of seven known errors related to autopsy activity following death by unnatural causes, with the purpose of alerting MLEs who work under the Italian judicial system to the potential dangers of such errors. These relate to: oversights in autopsy technique, incorrect collection of photographic and video material, unauthorized attendance at the autopsy, missing/mistaken reporting at any stage of the forensic activity, failure to notify the party forensic consultant, using histological or toxicological nonaccredited laboratories for forensic activities, and lack of observance of the chain of custody.</p>","PeriodicalId":36813,"journal":{"name":"Academic Forensic Pathology","volume":"11 4","pages":"208-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8727839/pdf/10.1177_19253621211056191.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The \\\"Magnificent Seven Errors\\\" in Forensic Autopsy Practice: The Italian Context.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Scendoni,&nbsp;Piergiorgio Fedeli,&nbsp;Nunzia Cannovo,&nbsp;Mariano Cingolani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19253621211056191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>According to the Italian legal system, forensic autopsies are performed by a medical doctor specialized in legal medicine, otherwise known as a medicolegal expert (MLE), who has a range of very complex responsibilities. Indeed, the quality of forensic autopsy activity is always questioned in courts of law; incorrect assessments are dangerous because they can jeopardize the validity of a criminal investigation and thus affect the outcome so that a real culprit may be acquitted or an innocent person convicted. Nonconformities also discredit the professionalism of the specialist who performs the autopsy. The work of a MLE implies a series of assignments and duties that should be given constant consideration, but when certain aspects of this activity are underestimated or overlooked, this can lead the expert to make mistakes with irreparable consequences for the judicial investigation. In this article, for the first time, we present a summary of seven known errors related to autopsy activity following death by unnatural causes, with the purpose of alerting MLEs who work under the Italian judicial system to the potential dangers of such errors. These relate to: oversights in autopsy technique, incorrect collection of photographic and video material, unauthorized attendance at the autopsy, missing/mistaken reporting at any stage of the forensic activity, failure to notify the party forensic consultant, using histological or toxicological nonaccredited laboratories for forensic activities, and lack of observance of the chain of custody.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Forensic Pathology\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"208-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8727839/pdf/10.1177_19253621211056191.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Forensic Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621211056191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Forensic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621211056191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

根据意大利法律制度,法医尸检由专门从事法律医学的医生进行,也称为法医专家(MLE),他有一系列非常复杂的职责。的确,法庭上法医解剖活动的质量总是受到质疑;错误的评估是危险的,因为它可能危及刑事调查的有效性,从而影响结果,使真正的罪犯可能被无罪释放,或使无辜的人被定罪。不符合也使进行尸检的专家的专业精神受到怀疑。MLE的工作意味着一系列的任务和职责,这些任务和职责应该得到不断的考虑,但是当这项活动的某些方面被低估或忽视时,这可能导致专家犯错误,对司法调查造成不可弥补的后果。在本文中,我们首次总结了与非自然原因死亡后尸检活动有关的七个已知错误,目的是提醒在意大利司法系统下工作的mle注意此类错误的潜在危险。这些问题涉及:尸检技术上的疏忽,不正确收集照片和视频材料,未经授权出席尸检,在法医活动的任何阶段缺少/错误报告,未通知法医顾问,使用未经认可的组织学或毒理学实验室进行法医活动,以及缺乏对监管链的遵守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The "Magnificent Seven Errors" in Forensic Autopsy Practice: The Italian Context.

According to the Italian legal system, forensic autopsies are performed by a medical doctor specialized in legal medicine, otherwise known as a medicolegal expert (MLE), who has a range of very complex responsibilities. Indeed, the quality of forensic autopsy activity is always questioned in courts of law; incorrect assessments are dangerous because they can jeopardize the validity of a criminal investigation and thus affect the outcome so that a real culprit may be acquitted or an innocent person convicted. Nonconformities also discredit the professionalism of the specialist who performs the autopsy. The work of a MLE implies a series of assignments and duties that should be given constant consideration, but when certain aspects of this activity are underestimated or overlooked, this can lead the expert to make mistakes with irreparable consequences for the judicial investigation. In this article, for the first time, we present a summary of seven known errors related to autopsy activity following death by unnatural causes, with the purpose of alerting MLEs who work under the Italian judicial system to the potential dangers of such errors. These relate to: oversights in autopsy technique, incorrect collection of photographic and video material, unauthorized attendance at the autopsy, missing/mistaken reporting at any stage of the forensic activity, failure to notify the party forensic consultant, using histological or toxicological nonaccredited laboratories for forensic activities, and lack of observance of the chain of custody.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Forensic Pathology
Academic Forensic Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Concealed Homicide in a Sexually Abused Child. The Sudden Death of Cardinal Decio Azzolino Junior (1623-1689), the Universal Heir of Queen Christina of Sweden: A Dropsy Case? Deaths Related to New-Onset Seizures After Vaccination. Left Thumb to Left Big Toe: An Uncommon Case of Electrocution Suicide. Forensic Pathologist Testimony, Part 1: Common Questions and Considerations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1