同步放化疗加与不加新辅助化疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的比较研究。

Q3 Medicine The gulf journal of oncology Pub Date : 2021-09-01
Simrandeep Singh, Ratika Gupta, Tejinder Paul Singh, S L Jakhar, Neeti Sharma, H S Kumar
{"title":"同步放化疗加与不加新辅助化疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的比较研究。","authors":"Simrandeep Singh,&nbsp;Ratika Gupta,&nbsp;Tejinder Paul Singh,&nbsp;S L Jakhar,&nbsp;Neeti Sharma,&nbsp;H S Kumar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether induction chemotherapy along with concurrent chemoradiotherapy would result in better tumor control, improved symptom control and any variation in toxicity as compared to concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between February 2015 to September 2016, 25 patients each were randomized to control group, in which they received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 intravenous, during chest radiotherapy of 66Gy in 33 fractions for 6.5 weeks, and study group, in which patients received three cycles of induction chemotherapy with Cisplatin 75 mg/m2and Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2administered every 21 days followed by identical chemoradiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups of patients (with induction vs. without induction chemotherapy) were similar in age, performance status, histology, grade, and stage. At 6thmonth follow-up, complete response was seen in 6 patients in control arm and 7 patients in study arm (?2 = 1.603, p = 0.205) and partial response was seen in 13 and 12 patients in control and study arms respectively (?2 = 1.932, p = 0.165). Symptom control of cough, hemoptysis, chest pain and dyspnoea were also similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In our study, no difference in treatment outcome with respect to the two groups was observed, which was similar to studies which have been conducted previously. Radiation is a good modality for symptom control of cough, hemoptysis, chest pain and dyspnoea. In toxicities, pneumonitis and hematological toxicity was slightly higher in study group even at 6th month follow up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Slight increase in toxicity with no added benefit in locoregional tumor control and symptom regression, was seen in patients receiving induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone can thus be used as only modality of treatment in unresectable stage III NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":53633,"journal":{"name":"The gulf journal of oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study Of Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Treatment of Locally Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Simrandeep Singh,&nbsp;Ratika Gupta,&nbsp;Tejinder Paul Singh,&nbsp;S L Jakhar,&nbsp;Neeti Sharma,&nbsp;H S Kumar\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether induction chemotherapy along with concurrent chemoradiotherapy would result in better tumor control, improved symptom control and any variation in toxicity as compared to concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between February 2015 to September 2016, 25 patients each were randomized to control group, in which they received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 intravenous, during chest radiotherapy of 66Gy in 33 fractions for 6.5 weeks, and study group, in which patients received three cycles of induction chemotherapy with Cisplatin 75 mg/m2and Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2administered every 21 days followed by identical chemoradiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups of patients (with induction vs. without induction chemotherapy) were similar in age, performance status, histology, grade, and stage. At 6thmonth follow-up, complete response was seen in 6 patients in control arm and 7 patients in study arm (?2 = 1.603, p = 0.205) and partial response was seen in 13 and 12 patients in control and study arms respectively (?2 = 1.932, p = 0.165). Symptom control of cough, hemoptysis, chest pain and dyspnoea were also similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In our study, no difference in treatment outcome with respect to the two groups was observed, which was similar to studies which have been conducted previously. Radiation is a good modality for symptom control of cough, hemoptysis, chest pain and dyspnoea. In toxicities, pneumonitis and hematological toxicity was slightly higher in study group even at 6th month follow up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Slight increase in toxicity with no added benefit in locoregional tumor control and symptom regression, was seen in patients receiving induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone can thus be used as only modality of treatment in unresectable stage III NSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The gulf journal of oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The gulf journal of oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The gulf journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不可切除的III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗是同步放化疗。本研究旨在评估诱导化疗联合同步放化疗与单独同步放化疗相比,是否能更好地控制肿瘤,改善症状控制和毒性变化。患者及方法:2015年2月至2016年9月,随机选取25例患者,对照组患者接受顺铂40mg /m2静脉同步放化疗,66Gy分33次胸腔放疗,疗程6.5周;研究组患者接受顺铂75mg /m2、紫杉醇175mg /m2诱导化疗,每21天给药3个周期,同时进行相同的放化疗。结果:两组患者(诱导与不诱导化疗)在年龄、运动状态、组织学、分级和分期上相似。在6个月的随访中,对照组有6例患者完全缓解,研究组有7例患者完全缓解。2 = 1.603, p = 0.205),对照组和研究组分别有13例和12例患者出现部分缓解(?2 = 1.932, p = 0.165)。两组咳嗽、咯血、胸痛、呼吸困难的症状控制情况相似。讨论:在我们的研究中,没有观察到两组治疗结果的差异,这与之前的研究相似。放射治疗是控制咳嗽、咯血、胸痛、呼吸困难等症状的良好方法。在毒性方面,即使在随访6个月时,研究组的肺炎和血液毒性也略高。结论:在诱导化疗后放化疗的患者中,毒性略有增加,但在局部肿瘤控制和症状消退方面没有增加益处。因此,同步放化疗可以作为无法切除的III期非小细胞肺癌的唯一治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Study Of Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Treatment of Locally Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Introduction: The standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether induction chemotherapy along with concurrent chemoradiotherapy would result in better tumor control, improved symptom control and any variation in toxicity as compared to concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone.

Patients and methods: Between February 2015 to September 2016, 25 patients each were randomized to control group, in which they received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 intravenous, during chest radiotherapy of 66Gy in 33 fractions for 6.5 weeks, and study group, in which patients received three cycles of induction chemotherapy with Cisplatin 75 mg/m2and Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2administered every 21 days followed by identical chemoradiotherapy.

Results: The two groups of patients (with induction vs. without induction chemotherapy) were similar in age, performance status, histology, grade, and stage. At 6thmonth follow-up, complete response was seen in 6 patients in control arm and 7 patients in study arm (?2 = 1.603, p = 0.205) and partial response was seen in 13 and 12 patients in control and study arms respectively (?2 = 1.932, p = 0.165). Symptom control of cough, hemoptysis, chest pain and dyspnoea were also similar in both groups.

Discussion: In our study, no difference in treatment outcome with respect to the two groups was observed, which was similar to studies which have been conducted previously. Radiation is a good modality for symptom control of cough, hemoptysis, chest pain and dyspnoea. In toxicities, pneumonitis and hematological toxicity was slightly higher in study group even at 6th month follow up.

Conclusion: Slight increase in toxicity with no added benefit in locoregional tumor control and symptom regression, was seen in patients receiving induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone can thus be used as only modality of treatment in unresectable stage III NSCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The gulf journal of oncology
The gulf journal of oncology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Assessing Mismatch Repair Expression by Immunohistochemistry in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma -Insight from a Tertiary Care Centre. Assessment of Radiation Induced Pneumonitis and Pericarditis in Patients Undergoing Breast Conservative Treatment Using Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique. Comparison of Acute Toxicities, Overall Treatment Time and Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with IMRT and Helical Tomotherapy. Cost of Healthcare Services in Geriatric Neuro-oncology: A descriptive Analysis. Establishing and Monitoring an Effective Management of Benign Nontoxic Multinodular Goitre in Kuwait "Utilizing Two Different Dose Levels of Recombinant Human TSH in Combination with Radioactive Iodine".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1