三代β -肾上腺素能阻滞剂的降压和心脏保护作用:一个历史的观点。

Q2 Medicine Hospital practice (1995) Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-23 DOI:10.1080/21548331.2022.2040920
Steven G Chrysant, George S Chrysant
{"title":"三代β -肾上腺素能阻滞剂的降压和心脏保护作用:一个历史的观点。","authors":"Steven G Chrysant,&nbsp;George S Chrysant","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2022.2040920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are currently three generations of beta-adrenergic blockers for the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. The 1<sup>st</sup> generation caused vasoconstriction and bronchoconstriction due to β<sub>1</sub> + β<sub>2</sub> receptor blockade and unopposed α<sub>1</sub> receptors. The 2<sup>nd</sup> generation of beta-blockers has lesser adverse effects than the 1<sup>st</sup> generation with the 3<sup>rd</sup> generation beta-blockers having much lesser effects than the other two generations. Current US and International guidelines do not recommend beta-blockers as first-line therapy of hypertension, but only in the presence of coronary artery disease or heart failure due to their lesser antihypertensive effect. These recommendations are disputed by several older and recent studies which have shown that the beta-blockers are effective and safe for the treatment of hypertension and could be used as first-line therapy. To clarify this issue a Medline search of the English language literature was conducted between 2012 and 2021 and 30 pertinent papers were selected. The data from these studies show that the beta-blockers have inferior antihypertensive and stroke protective effect compared with the other classes of antihypertensive drugs and should be used as first line therapy only in patients with hypertension associated with coronary artery disease or heart failure. The information from these papers and collateral literature will be discussed in this perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":35045,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (1995)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antihypertensive and cardioprotective effects of three generations of beta-adrenergic blockers: an historical perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Steven G Chrysant,&nbsp;George S Chrysant\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21548331.2022.2040920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are currently three generations of beta-adrenergic blockers for the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. The 1<sup>st</sup> generation caused vasoconstriction and bronchoconstriction due to β<sub>1</sub> + β<sub>2</sub> receptor blockade and unopposed α<sub>1</sub> receptors. The 2<sup>nd</sup> generation of beta-blockers has lesser adverse effects than the 1<sup>st</sup> generation with the 3<sup>rd</sup> generation beta-blockers having much lesser effects than the other two generations. Current US and International guidelines do not recommend beta-blockers as first-line therapy of hypertension, but only in the presence of coronary artery disease or heart failure due to their lesser antihypertensive effect. These recommendations are disputed by several older and recent studies which have shown that the beta-blockers are effective and safe for the treatment of hypertension and could be used as first-line therapy. To clarify this issue a Medline search of the English language literature was conducted between 2012 and 2021 and 30 pertinent papers were selected. The data from these studies show that the beta-blockers have inferior antihypertensive and stroke protective effect compared with the other classes of antihypertensive drugs and should be used as first line therapy only in patients with hypertension associated with coronary artery disease or heart failure. The information from these papers and collateral literature will be discussed in this perspective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital practice (1995)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital practice (1995)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2022.2040920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2022.2040920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目前有三代用于治疗高血压和心血管疾病的-肾上腺素能阻滞剂。第一代由于β1 + β2受体阻断和α1受体未对抗而引起血管收缩和支气管收缩。第二代受体阻滞剂的副作用比第一代小,第三代受体阻滞剂的副作用比其他两代小得多。目前美国和国际指南不推荐β -受体阻滞剂作为高血压的一线治疗,但仅在存在冠状动脉疾病或心力衰竭的情况下使用,因为它们的降压作用较小。这些建议受到一些较早和最近的研究的质疑,这些研究表明-受体阻滞剂对治疗高血压是有效和安全的,可以用作一线治疗。为了澄清这一问题,在2012年至2021年期间对英语文献进行了Medline检索,并选择了30篇相关论文。这些研究的数据表明,与其他类型的降压药物相比,受体阻滞剂的降压和卒中保护作用较差,仅应用于高血压合并冠状动脉疾病或心力衰竭患者的一线治疗。从这些论文和附属文献的信息将在这个角度进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antihypertensive and cardioprotective effects of three generations of beta-adrenergic blockers: an historical perspective.

There are currently three generations of beta-adrenergic blockers for the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. The 1st generation caused vasoconstriction and bronchoconstriction due to β1 + β2 receptor blockade and unopposed α1 receptors. The 2nd generation of beta-blockers has lesser adverse effects than the 1st generation with the 3rd generation beta-blockers having much lesser effects than the other two generations. Current US and International guidelines do not recommend beta-blockers as first-line therapy of hypertension, but only in the presence of coronary artery disease or heart failure due to their lesser antihypertensive effect. These recommendations are disputed by several older and recent studies which have shown that the beta-blockers are effective and safe for the treatment of hypertension and could be used as first-line therapy. To clarify this issue a Medline search of the English language literature was conducted between 2012 and 2021 and 30 pertinent papers were selected. The data from these studies show that the beta-blockers have inferior antihypertensive and stroke protective effect compared with the other classes of antihypertensive drugs and should be used as first line therapy only in patients with hypertension associated with coronary artery disease or heart failure. The information from these papers and collateral literature will be discussed in this perspective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital practice (1995)
Hospital practice (1995) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
An insight into the updated pharmacotherapy of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in lean individuals: a review. Chest tube size selection for pleural effusion: from the perspective of thoracic surgeons and pulmonologists. Prescription for crisis: the compounding effect of community drug shortages on Lebanon's healthcare system. Outcomes and complications of heart failure with iron deficiency anemia: a nationwide analysis. Benign acute myositis in an adult: case-based review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1