临床可行的心肌CCTA分割用于测量血管特异性心肌血流的动态PET/CCTA混合融合。

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Hybrid Imaging Pub Date : 2022-02-15 DOI:10.1186/s41824-021-00122-1
Marina Piccinelli, Navdeep Dahiya, Jonathon A Nye, Russell Folks, C David Cooke, Daya Manatunga, Doyeon Hwang, Jin Chul Paeng, Sang-Geon Cho, Joo Myung Lee, Hee-Seung Bom, Bon-Kwon Koo, Anthony Yezzi, Ernest V Garcia
{"title":"临床可行的心肌CCTA分割用于测量血管特异性心肌血流的动态PET/CCTA混合融合。","authors":"Marina Piccinelli,&nbsp;Navdeep Dahiya,&nbsp;Jonathon A Nye,&nbsp;Russell Folks,&nbsp;C David Cooke,&nbsp;Daya Manatunga,&nbsp;Doyeon Hwang,&nbsp;Jin Chul Paeng,&nbsp;Sang-Geon Cho,&nbsp;Joo Myung Lee,&nbsp;Hee-Seung Bom,&nbsp;Bon-Kwon Koo,&nbsp;Anthony Yezzi,&nbsp;Ernest V Garcia","doi":"10.1186/s41824-021-00122-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Positron emission tomography (PET)-derived LV MBF quantification is usually measured in standard anatomical vascular territories potentially averaging flow from normally perfused tissue with those from areas with abnormal flow supply. Previously we reported on an image-based tool to noninvasively measure absolute myocardial blood flow at locations just below individual epicardial vessel to help guide revascularization. The aim of this work is to determine the robustness of vessel-specific flow measurements (MBF<sup>vs</sup>) extracted from the fusion of dynamic PET (dPET) with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) myocardial segmentations, using flow measured from the fusion with CCTA manual segmentation as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-three patients' <sup>13</sup>NH<sub>3</sub> dPET, CCTA image datasets were used to measure the agreement of the MBF<sup>vs</sup> profiles after the fusion of dPET data with three CCTA anatomical models: (1) a manual model, (2) a fully automated segmented model and (3) a corrected model, where major inaccuracies in the automated segmentation were briefly edited. Pairwise accuracy of the normality/abnormality agreement of flow values along differently extracted vessels was determined by comparing, on a point-by-point basis, each vessel's flow to corresponding vessels' normal limits using Dice coefficients (DC) as the metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 43 patients CCTA fully automated mask models, 27 patients' borders required manual correction before dPET/CCTA image fusion, but this editing process was brief (2-3 min) allowing a 100% success rate of extracting MBF<sup>vs</sup> in clinically acceptable times. In total, 124 vessels were analyzed after dPET fusion with the manual and corrected CCTA mask models yielding 2225 stress and 2122 rest flow values. Forty-seven vessels were analyzed after fusion with the fully automatic masks producing 840 stress and 825 rest flow samples. All DC coefficients computed globally or by territory were ≥ 0.93. No statistical differences were found in the normal/abnormal flow classifications between manual and corrected or manual and fully automated CCTA masks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fully automated and manually corrected myocardial CCTA segmentation provides anatomical masks in clinically acceptable times for vessel-specific myocardial blood flow measurements using dynamic PET/CCTA image fusion which are not significantly different in flow accuracy and within clinically acceptable processing times compared to fully manually segmented CCTA myocardial masks.</p>","PeriodicalId":36160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844325/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinically viable myocardial CCTA segmentation for measuring vessel-specific myocardial blood flow from dynamic PET/CCTA hybrid fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Marina Piccinelli,&nbsp;Navdeep Dahiya,&nbsp;Jonathon A Nye,&nbsp;Russell Folks,&nbsp;C David Cooke,&nbsp;Daya Manatunga,&nbsp;Doyeon Hwang,&nbsp;Jin Chul Paeng,&nbsp;Sang-Geon Cho,&nbsp;Joo Myung Lee,&nbsp;Hee-Seung Bom,&nbsp;Bon-Kwon Koo,&nbsp;Anthony Yezzi,&nbsp;Ernest V Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41824-021-00122-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Positron emission tomography (PET)-derived LV MBF quantification is usually measured in standard anatomical vascular territories potentially averaging flow from normally perfused tissue with those from areas with abnormal flow supply. Previously we reported on an image-based tool to noninvasively measure absolute myocardial blood flow at locations just below individual epicardial vessel to help guide revascularization. The aim of this work is to determine the robustness of vessel-specific flow measurements (MBF<sup>vs</sup>) extracted from the fusion of dynamic PET (dPET) with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) myocardial segmentations, using flow measured from the fusion with CCTA manual segmentation as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-three patients' <sup>13</sup>NH<sub>3</sub> dPET, CCTA image datasets were used to measure the agreement of the MBF<sup>vs</sup> profiles after the fusion of dPET data with three CCTA anatomical models: (1) a manual model, (2) a fully automated segmented model and (3) a corrected model, where major inaccuracies in the automated segmentation were briefly edited. Pairwise accuracy of the normality/abnormality agreement of flow values along differently extracted vessels was determined by comparing, on a point-by-point basis, each vessel's flow to corresponding vessels' normal limits using Dice coefficients (DC) as the metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 43 patients CCTA fully automated mask models, 27 patients' borders required manual correction before dPET/CCTA image fusion, but this editing process was brief (2-3 min) allowing a 100% success rate of extracting MBF<sup>vs</sup> in clinically acceptable times. In total, 124 vessels were analyzed after dPET fusion with the manual and corrected CCTA mask models yielding 2225 stress and 2122 rest flow values. Forty-seven vessels were analyzed after fusion with the fully automatic masks producing 840 stress and 825 rest flow samples. All DC coefficients computed globally or by territory were ≥ 0.93. No statistical differences were found in the normal/abnormal flow classifications between manual and corrected or manual and fully automated CCTA masks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fully automated and manually corrected myocardial CCTA segmentation provides anatomical masks in clinically acceptable times for vessel-specific myocardial blood flow measurements using dynamic PET/CCTA image fusion which are not significantly different in flow accuracy and within clinically acceptable processing times compared to fully manually segmented CCTA myocardial masks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844325/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-021-00122-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-021-00122-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:正电子发射断层扫描(PET)衍生的左室MBF量化通常在标准解剖血管区域测量,可能平均正常灌注组织和异常血流供应区域的流量。以前我们报道了一种基于图像的工具,可以无创性地测量单个心外膜血管下方位置的绝对心肌血流量,以帮助指导血运重建。这项工作的目的是确定从动态PET (dPET)与冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)心肌分割融合中提取的血管特异性流量测量(MBFvs)的稳健性,使用CCTA人工分割融合测量的流量作为参考标准。方法:采用43例患者的13NH3 dPET、CCTA图像数据集,测量dPET数据与三种CCTA解剖模型(1)手动模型、(2)全自动分割模型和(3)校正模型融合后MBFvs轮廓的一致性,并对自动分割中的主要不准确之处进行简要编辑。使用Dice系数(DC)作为度量,逐点比较每个血管的流量与相应血管的正常极限,从而确定沿不同提取血管的流量值的正常/异常一致性的成对准确性。结果:在43例CCTA全自动掩膜模型中,27例患者的边界需要在dPET/CCTA图像融合前进行人工校正,但这个编辑过程很短(2-3分钟),可以在临床可接受的时间内100%成功率提取mbfv。在dPET与手动和校正的CCTA掩模模型融合后,总共分析了124只血管,产生了2225个应力值和2122个静流量值。采用全自动面罩对47只血管进行融合后的分析,产生840个应力和825个静流量样本。全球或地区计算的所有DC系数均≥0.93。在正常/异常流量分类中,手工和校正或手动和全自动CCTA口罩之间没有统计学差异。结论:全自动和人工校正心肌CCTA分割在临床可接受的时间内为血管特异性心肌血流测量提供了解剖掩膜,使用动态PET/CCTA图像融合,与完全人工分割的CCTA心肌掩膜相比,在血流精度和临床可接受的处理时间内没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinically viable myocardial CCTA segmentation for measuring vessel-specific myocardial blood flow from dynamic PET/CCTA hybrid fusion.

Background: Positron emission tomography (PET)-derived LV MBF quantification is usually measured in standard anatomical vascular territories potentially averaging flow from normally perfused tissue with those from areas with abnormal flow supply. Previously we reported on an image-based tool to noninvasively measure absolute myocardial blood flow at locations just below individual epicardial vessel to help guide revascularization. The aim of this work is to determine the robustness of vessel-specific flow measurements (MBFvs) extracted from the fusion of dynamic PET (dPET) with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) myocardial segmentations, using flow measured from the fusion with CCTA manual segmentation as the reference standard.

Methods: Forty-three patients' 13NH3 dPET, CCTA image datasets were used to measure the agreement of the MBFvs profiles after the fusion of dPET data with three CCTA anatomical models: (1) a manual model, (2) a fully automated segmented model and (3) a corrected model, where major inaccuracies in the automated segmentation were briefly edited. Pairwise accuracy of the normality/abnormality agreement of flow values along differently extracted vessels was determined by comparing, on a point-by-point basis, each vessel's flow to corresponding vessels' normal limits using Dice coefficients (DC) as the metric.

Results: Of the 43 patients CCTA fully automated mask models, 27 patients' borders required manual correction before dPET/CCTA image fusion, but this editing process was brief (2-3 min) allowing a 100% success rate of extracting MBFvs in clinically acceptable times. In total, 124 vessels were analyzed after dPET fusion with the manual and corrected CCTA mask models yielding 2225 stress and 2122 rest flow values. Forty-seven vessels were analyzed after fusion with the fully automatic masks producing 840 stress and 825 rest flow samples. All DC coefficients computed globally or by territory were ≥ 0.93. No statistical differences were found in the normal/abnormal flow classifications between manual and corrected or manual and fully automated CCTA masks.

Conclusion: Fully automated and manually corrected myocardial CCTA segmentation provides anatomical masks in clinically acceptable times for vessel-specific myocardial blood flow measurements using dynamic PET/CCTA image fusion which are not significantly different in flow accuracy and within clinically acceptable processing times compared to fully manually segmented CCTA myocardial masks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor demonstrated by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in a patient: a case report Carcinoid crisis in Lutetium-177-Dotatate therapy of neuroendocrine tumors: an overview of pathophysiology, risk factors, recognition, and treatment Four-dimensional computed tomography as first-line imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism, a retrospective comparison to conventional imaging in a predominantly single adenoma population Clinical value of semi-quantitative parameters in 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in treatment and diagnostics of cranial meningioma in a single-center retrospective analysis Cardiac transplant rejection assessment with 18F-FDG PET-CT: initial single-centre experience for diagnosis and management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1