根据精神病学诊断,探讨住院患者临床样本中mini-ICF-APP的因子结构

Stephan T. Egger , Godehard Weniger , Julio Bobes , Erich Seifritz , Stefan Vetter
{"title":"根据精神病学诊断,探讨住院患者临床样本中mini-ICF-APP的因子结构","authors":"Stephan T. Egger ,&nbsp;Godehard Weniger ,&nbsp;Julio Bobes ,&nbsp;Erich Seifritz ,&nbsp;Stefan Vetter","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsmen.2021.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Psychosocial functioning is a key factor determining prognosis, severity, impairment and quality of life in people who have a mental disorder. The mini-ICF-APP was developed to provide a standardised classification of functioning and disability. However, despite its gaining popularity little is known about its structure and performance. This paper examines the structure of the mini-ICF-APP using factor analysis techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In a clinical sample of 3178 patients, with psychiatric diagnoses from several ICD-10 categories, we analysed internal consistency, item inter-correlations and the factorial structure of the data, with reference to ICD-10 diagnostic categories; Neurocognitive Disorders; Alcohol Use Disorders; Substance Use Disorders; Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders; Bipolar Disorder; Major Depressive Disorder; Anxiety Disorders; Personality Disorders; and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found good internal consistency and item inter-correlations (Cronbach alpha<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.92) for the mini-ICF-APP. We were able to identify pivotal domains (flexibility, assertiveness and intimate relationships), which demonstrate sub-threshold influences on other domains. The factor analysis yielded a one-factor model as ideal for the whole sample and for all diagnostic categories. For some diagnostic categories the data suggested a two or three-factor model, however, with poorer fit indices.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The factor structure of the mini-ICF-APP appears to modify according to the main diagnosis. However, a one-factor model demonstrates better fit regardless of diagnostic category. Consequently, we consider the mini-ICF-APP to be a trans-diagnostic measurement instrument for the assessment and grading of psychosocial functioning. The use of the mini-ICF-APP sum score seems to best reflect the degree of impairment in an individual, even taking into account that affected domains may lead to sub-threshold effects on other domains.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101104,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)","volume":"14 4","pages":"Pages 186-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173505021000558/pdfft?md5=aa710fa968ab9b4d7a22c364703d0aee&pid=1-s2.0-S2173505021000558-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the factor structure of the mini-ICF-APP in an inpatient clinical sample, according to the psychiatric diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"Stephan T. Egger ,&nbsp;Godehard Weniger ,&nbsp;Julio Bobes ,&nbsp;Erich Seifritz ,&nbsp;Stefan Vetter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rpsmen.2021.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Psychosocial functioning is a key factor determining prognosis, severity, impairment and quality of life in people who have a mental disorder. The mini-ICF-APP was developed to provide a standardised classification of functioning and disability. However, despite its gaining popularity little is known about its structure and performance. This paper examines the structure of the mini-ICF-APP using factor analysis techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In a clinical sample of 3178 patients, with psychiatric diagnoses from several ICD-10 categories, we analysed internal consistency, item inter-correlations and the factorial structure of the data, with reference to ICD-10 diagnostic categories; Neurocognitive Disorders; Alcohol Use Disorders; Substance Use Disorders; Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders; Bipolar Disorder; Major Depressive Disorder; Anxiety Disorders; Personality Disorders; and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found good internal consistency and item inter-correlations (Cronbach alpha<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.92) for the mini-ICF-APP. We were able to identify pivotal domains (flexibility, assertiveness and intimate relationships), which demonstrate sub-threshold influences on other domains. The factor analysis yielded a one-factor model as ideal for the whole sample and for all diagnostic categories. For some diagnostic categories the data suggested a two or three-factor model, however, with poorer fit indices.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The factor structure of the mini-ICF-APP appears to modify according to the main diagnosis. However, a one-factor model demonstrates better fit regardless of diagnostic category. Consequently, we consider the mini-ICF-APP to be a trans-diagnostic measurement instrument for the assessment and grading of psychosocial functioning. The use of the mini-ICF-APP sum score seems to best reflect the degree of impairment in an individual, even taking into account that affected domains may lead to sub-threshold effects on other domains.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 186-195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173505021000558/pdfft?md5=aa710fa968ab9b4d7a22c364703d0aee&pid=1-s2.0-S2173505021000558-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173505021000558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173505021000558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理社会功能是决定精神障碍患者预后、严重程度、损害和生活质量的关键因素。mini-ICF-APP的开发是为了提供功能和残疾的标准化分类。然而,尽管它越来越受欢迎,但人们对它的结构和性能知之甚少。本文利用因子分析技术考察了mini-ICF-APP的结构。参考ICD-10的诊断分类,我们分析了3178例临床样本的内部一致性、项目相互相关性和数据的析因结构;神经认知障碍;酒精使用障碍;物质使用障碍;精神分裂症和精神障碍;双相情感障碍;重度抑郁症;焦虑障碍;人格障碍;以及神经发育障碍。结果mini-ICF-APP具有良好的内部一致性和项目间相关性(Cronbach alpha = 0.92)。我们能够确定关键领域(灵活性、自信和亲密关系),这些领域对其他领域的影响低于阈值。因子分析产生了一个单因素模型作为理想的整个样本和所有诊断类别。然而,对于某些诊断类别,数据显示是两个或三个因素的模型,拟合指数较差。结论mini-ICF-APP的因子结构随着主要诊断的不同而发生改变。然而,无论诊断类别如何,单因素模型都具有更好的拟合性。因此,我们认为mini-ICF-APP是一种跨诊断的测量工具,用于评估和评定心理社会功能。即使考虑到受影响的域可能导致其他域的亚阈值效应,使用mini-ICF-APP总评分似乎也能最好地反映个体的损伤程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the factor structure of the mini-ICF-APP in an inpatient clinical sample, according to the psychiatric diagnosis

Introduction

Psychosocial functioning is a key factor determining prognosis, severity, impairment and quality of life in people who have a mental disorder. The mini-ICF-APP was developed to provide a standardised classification of functioning and disability. However, despite its gaining popularity little is known about its structure and performance. This paper examines the structure of the mini-ICF-APP using factor analysis techniques.

Materials and methods

In a clinical sample of 3178 patients, with psychiatric diagnoses from several ICD-10 categories, we analysed internal consistency, item inter-correlations and the factorial structure of the data, with reference to ICD-10 diagnostic categories; Neurocognitive Disorders; Alcohol Use Disorders; Substance Use Disorders; Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders; Bipolar Disorder; Major Depressive Disorder; Anxiety Disorders; Personality Disorders; and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Results

We found good internal consistency and item inter-correlations (Cronbach alpha = 0.92) for the mini-ICF-APP. We were able to identify pivotal domains (flexibility, assertiveness and intimate relationships), which demonstrate sub-threshold influences on other domains. The factor analysis yielded a one-factor model as ideal for the whole sample and for all diagnostic categories. For some diagnostic categories the data suggested a two or three-factor model, however, with poorer fit indices.

Conclusions

The factor structure of the mini-ICF-APP appears to modify according to the main diagnosis. However, a one-factor model demonstrates better fit regardless of diagnostic category. Consequently, we consider the mini-ICF-APP to be a trans-diagnostic measurement instrument for the assessment and grading of psychosocial functioning. The use of the mini-ICF-APP sum score seems to best reflect the degree of impairment in an individual, even taking into account that affected domains may lead to sub-threshold effects on other domains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Covid-19 outbreak in a Spanish long-term psychiatric hospital led to infections in 6 clozapine patients: elevations in their plasma clozapine levels Diagnostic stability in substance-induced psychosis Clozapine-associated myocarditis in the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database: Focus on reports from various countries Dried Blood Spot (DBS) as a useful tool to improve clozapine, aripiprazole and paliperidone treatment: From adherence to efficiency Risk factors of deficit and non-deficit schizophrenia: Results from a cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1