【潜力大,内容少:德国应用商店泌尿科应用的质量和数量概述】。

Der Urologe. Ausg. A Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-03 DOI:10.1007/s00120-021-01716-0
Angelika Mattigk, Laura Bellut, Urs-Vito Albrecht, Ute von Jan, Julian P Struck
{"title":"【潜力大,内容少:德国应用商店泌尿科应用的质量和数量概述】。","authors":"Angelika Mattigk,&nbsp;Laura Bellut,&nbsp;Urs-Vito Albrecht,&nbsp;Ute von Jan,&nbsp;Julian P Struck","doi":"10.1007/s00120-021-01716-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The range of medical apps is broad and diverse. The previous evaluations are inconsistent and limited to the respective areas of application.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The main objective of this work is to comprehensively present, organize, and evaluate the current range of urological apps with the help of a semi-automatic retrospective app store analysis (SARASA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Application of an adaptable method based on filter processes according to predefined criteria by means of SARASA to characterize urological apps from various subject areas in the Apple App Store with subsequent manual filtering and evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the original list of 34,830 apps in the \"Medicine\" category of the Apple App Store on 27 September 2021, 3556 apps remained after apps without a German-language store description were removed. 43 subject-specific apps remained for further analysis and description. The number of reviews, rating, topicality, urological issues, technical support and richness of content were taken into account. The two most relevant apps for each topic are presented in detail.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SARASA offers an easy-to-use method for applying filter processes to identify apps in app stores that meet predefined, formal criteria. The highest number of apps can be classified in categories of patient information and further education and training. An app officially listed by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Products (BfArM) in the sense of a digital health application (DiGA), the costs of which are reimbursed by the health insurance companies, is available for urology in only one single case. The authors see great potential for future developments in this regard.</p>","PeriodicalId":11123,"journal":{"name":"Der Urologe. Ausg. A","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Great potential, little substance : Overview of quality and quantity of urological apps in the German app store].\",\"authors\":\"Angelika Mattigk,&nbsp;Laura Bellut,&nbsp;Urs-Vito Albrecht,&nbsp;Ute von Jan,&nbsp;Julian P Struck\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00120-021-01716-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The range of medical apps is broad and diverse. The previous evaluations are inconsistent and limited to the respective areas of application.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The main objective of this work is to comprehensively present, organize, and evaluate the current range of urological apps with the help of a semi-automatic retrospective app store analysis (SARASA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Application of an adaptable method based on filter processes according to predefined criteria by means of SARASA to characterize urological apps from various subject areas in the Apple App Store with subsequent manual filtering and evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the original list of 34,830 apps in the \\\"Medicine\\\" category of the Apple App Store on 27 September 2021, 3556 apps remained after apps without a German-language store description were removed. 43 subject-specific apps remained for further analysis and description. The number of reviews, rating, topicality, urological issues, technical support and richness of content were taken into account. The two most relevant apps for each topic are presented in detail.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SARASA offers an easy-to-use method for applying filter processes to identify apps in app stores that meet predefined, formal criteria. The highest number of apps can be classified in categories of patient information and further education and training. An app officially listed by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Products (BfArM) in the sense of a digital health application (DiGA), the costs of which are reimbursed by the health insurance companies, is available for urology in only one single case. The authors see great potential for future developments in this regard.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Der Urologe. Ausg. A\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Der Urologe. Ausg. A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-021-01716-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Der Urologe. Ausg. A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-021-01716-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗应用程序的范围广泛而多样。以前的评价是不一致的,并且局限于各自的应用领域。目的:本工作的主要目的是在半自动回顾性应用商店分析(SARASA)的帮助下,全面呈现、组织和评估泌尿科应用程序的当前范围。方法:采用一种适应性强的方法,基于筛选过程,根据预定义的标准,通过SARASA对Apple App Store中各个学科领域的泌尿科应用程序进行表征,随后进行人工筛选和评估。结果:在2021年9月27日,苹果应用商店中“医药”类别的原始列表中有34,830个应用程序,在没有德语商店描述的应用程序被删除后,剩下3556个应用程序。43个特定主题的应用程序仍有待进一步分析和描述。评论的数量、评级、话题性、泌尿科问题、技术支持和内容的丰富程度都被考虑在内。详细介绍了每个主题的两个最相关的应用程序。结论:SARASA提供了一种易于使用的方法,用于应用筛选过程来识别应用商店中符合预定义正式标准的应用。最多的应用程序可以分类为患者信息和继续教育和培训。德国联邦药品和医疗产品研究所(BfArM)正式列出的一款应用程序,在数字健康应用程序(DiGA)的意义上,其费用由健康保险公司报销,仅在一个病例中可用于泌尿科。作者看到了这方面未来发展的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Great potential, little substance : Overview of quality and quantity of urological apps in the German app store].

Background: The range of medical apps is broad and diverse. The previous evaluations are inconsistent and limited to the respective areas of application.

Objectives: The main objective of this work is to comprehensively present, organize, and evaluate the current range of urological apps with the help of a semi-automatic retrospective app store analysis (SARASA).

Methods: Application of an adaptable method based on filter processes according to predefined criteria by means of SARASA to characterize urological apps from various subject areas in the Apple App Store with subsequent manual filtering and evaluation.

Results: From the original list of 34,830 apps in the "Medicine" category of the Apple App Store on 27 September 2021, 3556 apps remained after apps without a German-language store description were removed. 43 subject-specific apps remained for further analysis and description. The number of reviews, rating, topicality, urological issues, technical support and richness of content were taken into account. The two most relevant apps for each topic are presented in detail.

Conclusion: SARASA offers an easy-to-use method for applying filter processes to identify apps in app stores that meet predefined, formal criteria. The highest number of apps can be classified in categories of patient information and further education and training. An app officially listed by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Products (BfArM) in the sense of a digital health application (DiGA), the costs of which are reimbursed by the health insurance companies, is available for urology in only one single case. The authors see great potential for future developments in this regard.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Follow-up in superficial and metastatic bladder cancer]. [G-CSF for prophylaxis of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, anemia in cancer : Guidelines on supportive treatment part 1]. [Contemporary surgical management of benign prostatic obstruction in Germany : A population-wide study based on German hospital quality report data from 2006 to 2019]. [Conservative management of grade IV kidney lacerations due to stab wounds]. Nachsorge nach Steinsanierung bei Urolithiasis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1