意大利国立卫生研究院重大创伤综合管理临床实践指南:过程和方法。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.4415/ANN_21_04_09
Alice Josephine Fauci, Daniela Coclite, Antonello Napoletano, Daniela D'Angelo, Annalisa Biffi, Greta Castellini, Silvia Gianola, Laura Iacorossi, Roberto Latina, Gloria Porcu, Katia Salomone, Osvaldo Chiara, Primiano Iannone
{"title":"意大利国立卫生研究院重大创伤综合管理临床实践指南:过程和方法。","authors":"Alice Josephine Fauci,&nbsp;Daniela Coclite,&nbsp;Antonello Napoletano,&nbsp;Daniela D'Angelo,&nbsp;Annalisa Biffi,&nbsp;Greta Castellini,&nbsp;Silvia Gianola,&nbsp;Laura Iacorossi,&nbsp;Roberto Latina,&nbsp;Gloria Porcu,&nbsp;Katia Salomone,&nbsp;Osvaldo Chiara,&nbsp;Primiano Iannone","doi":"10.4415/ANN_21_04_09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major trauma describes serious injuries requiring lifesaving interventions or resulting in long-term disability; it represents about 8% of all deaths worldwide. Specific guidelines can help reduce deaths and disabilities, provided they adhere to high quality and trustworthiness standards. This article aims at introducing the development process of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, ISS (Italian National Institute of Health) guideline for major trauma integrated management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied the ISS methodological standards including the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scope was formulated by the multidisciplinary panel with stakeholders' involvement; two guidelines were identified as appropriate sources for adolopment. Forty questions from the two source guidelines were prioritised and five new ones formulated. New systematic reviews or updates were conducted for each clinical question, Evidence to Decision frameworks developed or re-assessed and the recommendations formulated after public consultations and external review. The policy on conflicts of interest was applied throughout the process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through a broad expertise representation, the early and wide stakeholders' participation, a continual process for disclosure and management of conflict of interests and the transparency of the process, ISS standards are proving to be an efficient model for developing trustworthy clinical guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8246,"journal":{"name":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","volume":"57 4","pages":"343-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical practice guideline for the integrated management of major trauma by the Italian National Institute of Health: process and methods.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Josephine Fauci,&nbsp;Daniela Coclite,&nbsp;Antonello Napoletano,&nbsp;Daniela D'Angelo,&nbsp;Annalisa Biffi,&nbsp;Greta Castellini,&nbsp;Silvia Gianola,&nbsp;Laura Iacorossi,&nbsp;Roberto Latina,&nbsp;Gloria Porcu,&nbsp;Katia Salomone,&nbsp;Osvaldo Chiara,&nbsp;Primiano Iannone\",\"doi\":\"10.4415/ANN_21_04_09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major trauma describes serious injuries requiring lifesaving interventions or resulting in long-term disability; it represents about 8% of all deaths worldwide. Specific guidelines can help reduce deaths and disabilities, provided they adhere to high quality and trustworthiness standards. This article aims at introducing the development process of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, ISS (Italian National Institute of Health) guideline for major trauma integrated management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied the ISS methodological standards including the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scope was formulated by the multidisciplinary panel with stakeholders' involvement; two guidelines were identified as appropriate sources for adolopment. Forty questions from the two source guidelines were prioritised and five new ones formulated. New systematic reviews or updates were conducted for each clinical question, Evidence to Decision frameworks developed or re-assessed and the recommendations formulated after public consultations and external review. The policy on conflicts of interest was applied throughout the process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through a broad expertise representation, the early and wide stakeholders' participation, a continual process for disclosure and management of conflict of interests and the transparency of the process, ISS standards are proving to be an efficient model for developing trustworthy clinical guidance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"343-351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_21_04_09\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_21_04_09","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:重大创伤描述需要挽救生命的干预措施或导致长期残疾的严重伤害;它约占全球死亡人数的8%。具体的准则可以帮助减少死亡和残疾,只要它们遵守高质量和可信赖的标准。本文旨在介绍意大利国立卫生研究院(Istituto Superiore di sanit)重大创伤综合管理指南的制定过程。方法:我们应用ISS方法标准,包括grade - adolopdevelopment方法来采用、适应和重新开发值得信赖的指南。结果:范围由多学科小组在利益相关者的参与下制定;确定了两项准则作为适当的发展来源。两个来源准则中的40个问题被列为优先事项,并制定了5个新问题。对每个临床问题进行了新的系统评价或更新,制定或重新评估了决策证据框架,并在公众咨询和外部审查后制定了建议。有关利益冲突的政策贯穿整个过程。结论:通过广泛的专业知识代表,早期和广泛的利益相关者参与,利益冲突的持续披露和管理过程以及过程的透明度,ISS标准被证明是开发值得信赖的临床指导的有效模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical practice guideline for the integrated management of major trauma by the Italian National Institute of Health: process and methods.

Background: Major trauma describes serious injuries requiring lifesaving interventions or resulting in long-term disability; it represents about 8% of all deaths worldwide. Specific guidelines can help reduce deaths and disabilities, provided they adhere to high quality and trustworthiness standards. This article aims at introducing the development process of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, ISS (Italian National Institute of Health) guideline for major trauma integrated management.

Methods: We applied the ISS methodological standards including the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy guidelines.

Results: The scope was formulated by the multidisciplinary panel with stakeholders' involvement; two guidelines were identified as appropriate sources for adolopment. Forty questions from the two source guidelines were prioritised and five new ones formulated. New systematic reviews or updates were conducted for each clinical question, Evidence to Decision frameworks developed or re-assessed and the recommendations formulated after public consultations and external review. The policy on conflicts of interest was applied throughout the process.

Conclusions: Through a broad expertise representation, the early and wide stakeholders' participation, a continual process for disclosure and management of conflict of interests and the transparency of the process, ISS standards are proving to be an efficient model for developing trustworthy clinical guidance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita
Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità is a peer reviewed quarterly science journal which publishes research articles in biomedicine, translational research and in many other disciplines of the health sciences. The journal includes the following material: original articles, reviews, commentaries, editorials, brief and technical notes, book reviews. The publication of Monographic Sections has been discontinued. In case you wish to present a small number of coordinated contributions on specific themes concerning priorities in public health, please contact the Editorial office. The journal is in English.
期刊最新文献
Between social and healthcare: a necessary synergy. Editorial. Diagnostic assessment, therapeutic care and education pathways in persons with autism spectrum disorder in transition from childhood to adulthood: the Italian National Ev.A Longitudinal Project. Do demographic and socio-economic factors predict Sense of Coherence among university students? Effectiveness of different local actions to control vitamin D prescription in Italy. The rare malformation holoprosencephaly: pathogenesis, association with pregestational diabetes and the possible link with food pollutants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1