拥抱不确定性:通过牧民的经历重新思考移民政策。

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Comparative Migration Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-21 DOI:10.1186/s40878-022-00277-1
Natasha Maru, Michele Nori, Ian Scoones, Greta Semplici, Anna Triandafyllidou
{"title":"拥抱不确定性:通过牧民的经历重新思考移民政策。","authors":"Natasha Maru, Michele Nori, Ian Scoones, Greta Semplici, Anna Triandafyllidou","doi":"10.1186/s40878-022-00277-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Today there is a disjuncture between migration flows that are complex, mixed and constantly evolving and the emerging global migration governance paradigm that seeks to impose clarity, certainty, regularity and order. Addressing the gap between policies and realities, this article explores lessons for migration policy and governance from mobile pastoralists' experience. Using examples from human migration flows within and between Europe and Africa and insights from pastoral systems from India, Italy and Kenya, the article identifies important similarities between international migration and pastoral mobility. We focus on four interconnections: both international migration and pastoral mobility show multi-directional and fragmented patterns; both involve multiple, intersecting socio-economic, political, cultural and environmental drivers; both must respond to non-linear systems, where critical junctures and tipping points undermine clear prediction and forecasts, making social navigation and reliability management more useful concepts than risk-based prediction and control and finally for both uncertainty is not conceived of as a state of crisis but an inherent feature, pregnant with possibility and hope. Building on these four points, and drawing from pastoralists' experiences, we propose some methodological, practical and policy reflections for bridging the disjuncture between migration realities on the ground and global migration governance policies and discourses.</p>","PeriodicalId":37051,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Migration Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embracing uncertainty: rethinking migration policy through pastoralists' experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Natasha Maru, Michele Nori, Ian Scoones, Greta Semplici, Anna Triandafyllidou\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40878-022-00277-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Today there is a disjuncture between migration flows that are complex, mixed and constantly evolving and the emerging global migration governance paradigm that seeks to impose clarity, certainty, regularity and order. Addressing the gap between policies and realities, this article explores lessons for migration policy and governance from mobile pastoralists' experience. Using examples from human migration flows within and between Europe and Africa and insights from pastoral systems from India, Italy and Kenya, the article identifies important similarities between international migration and pastoral mobility. We focus on four interconnections: both international migration and pastoral mobility show multi-directional and fragmented patterns; both involve multiple, intersecting socio-economic, political, cultural and environmental drivers; both must respond to non-linear systems, where critical junctures and tipping points undermine clear prediction and forecasts, making social navigation and reliability management more useful concepts than risk-based prediction and control and finally for both uncertainty is not conceived of as a state of crisis but an inherent feature, pregnant with possibility and hope. Building on these four points, and drawing from pastoralists' experiences, we propose some methodological, practical and policy reflections for bridging the disjuncture between migration realities on the ground and global migration governance policies and discourses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Migration Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777399/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Migration Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-022-00277-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-022-00277-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,复杂、混杂且不断演变的移民潮与新出现的全球移民治理模式之间存在脱节,前者试图强加清晰度、确定性、规律性和秩序。针对政策与现实之间的差距,本文探讨了流动牧民的经验对移民政策和管理的启示。文章以欧洲和非洲内部及之间的人口迁移流动为例,并从印度、意大利和肯尼亚的畜牧系统中汲取经验,指出了国际移民与畜牧流动之间的重要相似之处。我们将重点放在四种相互联系上:国际移民和牧民流动都呈现出多向、分散的模式;都涉及多种相互交织的社会经济、政治、文化和环境驱动因素;都必须对非线性系统做出反应,其中的临界点和转折点破坏了清晰的预测和预报,使得社会导航和可靠性管理比基于风险的预测和控制更有用;最后,对两者而言,不确定性不是一种危机状态,而是一种固有特征,蕴含着可能性和希望。基于以上四点,并借鉴牧民的经验,我们提出了一些方法论、实践和政策方面的思考,以弥合当地移民现实与全球移民治理政策和论述之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Embracing uncertainty: rethinking migration policy through pastoralists' experiences.

Today there is a disjuncture between migration flows that are complex, mixed and constantly evolving and the emerging global migration governance paradigm that seeks to impose clarity, certainty, regularity and order. Addressing the gap between policies and realities, this article explores lessons for migration policy and governance from mobile pastoralists' experience. Using examples from human migration flows within and between Europe and Africa and insights from pastoral systems from India, Italy and Kenya, the article identifies important similarities between international migration and pastoral mobility. We focus on four interconnections: both international migration and pastoral mobility show multi-directional and fragmented patterns; both involve multiple, intersecting socio-economic, political, cultural and environmental drivers; both must respond to non-linear systems, where critical junctures and tipping points undermine clear prediction and forecasts, making social navigation and reliability management more useful concepts than risk-based prediction and control and finally for both uncertainty is not conceived of as a state of crisis but an inherent feature, pregnant with possibility and hope. Building on these four points, and drawing from pastoralists' experiences, we propose some methodological, practical and policy reflections for bridging the disjuncture between migration realities on the ground and global migration governance policies and discourses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Migration Studies
Comparative Migration Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.60%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Standardised integration requirements for naturalisation: less rights and less discretion? A qualitative meta-analysis of ethnographic studies of naturalisation procedures in Europe Who are the immigrants that Israeli Jews prefer? The interplay between reasons for migration, religion, and religiosity Saving behavior among immigrant and native youth De-migranticizing as methodology: rethinking migration studies through immobility and liminality Ambiguous citizenship policies: Examining implementation gaps across levels of legislation in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1