混合土地利用与肥胖:替代土地利用措施和地理尺度的实证比较。

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Professional Geographer Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-04-03 DOI:10.1080/00330124.2011.583592
Ikuho Yamada, Barbara B Brown, Ken R Smith, Cathleen D Zick, Lori Kowaleski-Jones, Jessie X Fan
{"title":"混合土地利用与肥胖:替代土地利用措施和地理尺度的实证比较。","authors":"Ikuho Yamada,&nbsp;Barbara B Brown,&nbsp;Ken R Smith,&nbsp;Cathleen D Zick,&nbsp;Lori Kowaleski-Jones,&nbsp;Jessie X Fan","doi":"10.1080/00330124.2011.583592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obesity is a growing epidemic in the United States. Walkable neighborhoods, characterized as having the 3Ds of walkability (population Density, land use Diversity, and pedestrian-friendly Design), have been identified as a potentially promising factor to prevent obesity for their residents. Past studies examining the relationship between obesity and walkability vary in geographic scales of neighborhood definitions and methods of measuring the 3Ds. To better understand potential influences of these sometimes arbitrary choices, we test how four types of alternative measures of land use diversity measured at three geographic scales relate to body mass index for 4960 Salt Lake County adults. Generalized estimation equation models demonstrate that optimal diversity measures differed by gender and geographic scale and that integrating walkability measures at different scales improved the overall performance of models.</p>","PeriodicalId":48098,"journal":{"name":"Professional Geographer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00330124.2011.583592","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed land use and obesity: an empirical comparison of alternative land use measures and geographic scales.\",\"authors\":\"Ikuho Yamada,&nbsp;Barbara B Brown,&nbsp;Ken R Smith,&nbsp;Cathleen D Zick,&nbsp;Lori Kowaleski-Jones,&nbsp;Jessie X Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00330124.2011.583592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Obesity is a growing epidemic in the United States. Walkable neighborhoods, characterized as having the 3Ds of walkability (population Density, land use Diversity, and pedestrian-friendly Design), have been identified as a potentially promising factor to prevent obesity for their residents. Past studies examining the relationship between obesity and walkability vary in geographic scales of neighborhood definitions and methods of measuring the 3Ds. To better understand potential influences of these sometimes arbitrary choices, we test how four types of alternative measures of land use diversity measured at three geographic scales relate to body mass index for 4960 Salt Lake County adults. Generalized estimation equation models demonstrate that optimal diversity measures differed by gender and geographic scale and that integrating walkability measures at different scales improved the overall performance of models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Professional Geographer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00330124.2011.583592\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Professional Geographer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2011.583592\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/4/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Geographer","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2011.583592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

摘要

肥胖在美国日益流行。可步行社区具有可步行性的3D特征(人口密度、土地利用多样性和行人友好型设计),已被确定为预防居民肥胖的潜在因素。过去关于肥胖和步行能力之间关系的研究在邻域定义和3D测量方法的地理尺度上各不相同。为了更好地理解这些有时是武断的选择的潜在影响,我们测试了在三个地理尺度上测量的四种类型的土地利用多样性替代措施与4960名盐湖县成年人的体重指数之间的关系。广义估计方程模型表明,最佳多样性指标因性别和地理尺度而异,在不同尺度上整合可步行性指标可以提高模型的整体性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mixed land use and obesity: an empirical comparison of alternative land use measures and geographic scales.

Obesity is a growing epidemic in the United States. Walkable neighborhoods, characterized as having the 3Ds of walkability (population Density, land use Diversity, and pedestrian-friendly Design), have been identified as a potentially promising factor to prevent obesity for their residents. Past studies examining the relationship between obesity and walkability vary in geographic scales of neighborhood definitions and methods of measuring the 3Ds. To better understand potential influences of these sometimes arbitrary choices, we test how four types of alternative measures of land use diversity measured at three geographic scales relate to body mass index for 4960 Salt Lake County adults. Generalized estimation equation models demonstrate that optimal diversity measures differed by gender and geographic scale and that integrating walkability measures at different scales improved the overall performance of models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
90
期刊最新文献
A Geographical Approach to China's Local Government Debt. Conference Organizing in the Hybrid Age: Lessons from the Fourth International Feminist Geography Conference Blending in or Being Co-Opted: Reflecting on an Internship-Cum-Field Work at a New Town Government in China Impacts of COVID-19 on Biodiversity Conservation and Community Networks at Kibale National Park, Uganda Public Perceptions of Resilience and Vulnerability Concepts for Adaptation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1