心肺复苏术中冠脉灌注压的计算方法。

Michael P Otlewski, Leslie A Geddes, Michael Pargett, Charles F Babbs
{"title":"心肺复苏术中冠脉灌注压的计算方法。","authors":"Michael P Otlewski,&nbsp;Leslie A Geddes,&nbsp;Michael Pargett,&nbsp;Charles F Babbs","doi":"10.1007/s10558-009-9079-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) is a major indicator of the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in human and animal research studies, however, methods for calculating CPP differ among research groups. Here we compare the 6 published methods for calculating CPP using the same data set of aortic (Ao) and right atrial (RA) blood pressures. CPP was computed using each of the 6 calculation methods in an anesthetized pig model, instrumented with catheters with Cobe pressure transducers. Aortic and right atrial pressures were recorded continuously during electrically induced ventricular fibrillation and standard AHA CPR. CPP calculated from the same raw data set by the 6 calculation methods ranged from -1 (signifying retrograde blood flow) to 26 mmHg (mean +/- SD of 15 +/- 11 mmHg). The CPP achieved by standard closed chest CPR is typically reported as 10-20 mmHg. Within a single study the CPP values may be comparable; however, the CPP values for different studies may not be a reliable indicator of the efficacy of a given CPR method. Electronically derived true mean coronary perfusion pressure is arguably the gold standard method for representing coronary perfusion pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":55275,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":"98-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10558-009-9079-y","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for calculating coronary perfusion pressure during CPR.\",\"authors\":\"Michael P Otlewski,&nbsp;Leslie A Geddes,&nbsp;Michael Pargett,&nbsp;Charles F Babbs\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10558-009-9079-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) is a major indicator of the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in human and animal research studies, however, methods for calculating CPP differ among research groups. Here we compare the 6 published methods for calculating CPP using the same data set of aortic (Ao) and right atrial (RA) blood pressures. CPP was computed using each of the 6 calculation methods in an anesthetized pig model, instrumented with catheters with Cobe pressure transducers. Aortic and right atrial pressures were recorded continuously during electrically induced ventricular fibrillation and standard AHA CPR. CPP calculated from the same raw data set by the 6 calculation methods ranged from -1 (signifying retrograde blood flow) to 26 mmHg (mean +/- SD of 15 +/- 11 mmHg). The CPP achieved by standard closed chest CPR is typically reported as 10-20 mmHg. Within a single study the CPP values may be comparable; however, the CPP values for different studies may not be a reliable indicator of the efficacy of a given CPR method. Electronically derived true mean coronary perfusion pressure is arguably the gold standard method for representing coronary perfusion pressure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"98-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10558-009-9079-y\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10558-009-9079-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2009/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10558-009-9079-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

在人类和动物研究中,冠状动脉灌注压(CPP)是衡量心肺复苏有效性的主要指标,但不同研究组的CPP计算方法不同。在这里,我们比较了使用相同的主动脉(Ao)和右心房(RA)血压数据集计算CPP的6种已发表的方法。在麻醉猪模型中,使用6种计算方法中的每一种计算CPP,并使用Cobe压力传感器导管。在电致心室颤动和标准AHA CPR期间连续记录主动脉压和右心房压。通过6种计算方法从相同的原始数据集计算出的CPP范围从-1(表示逆行血流)到26 mmHg(平均+/- SD为15 +/- 11 mmHg)。标准闭式胸部心肺复苏术的CPP通常为10-20 mmHg。在单个研究中,CPP值可能具有可比性;然而,不同研究的CPP值可能不是给定CPR方法疗效的可靠指标。电子导出的真实平均冠状动脉灌注压可以说是表示冠状动脉灌注压的金标准方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methods for calculating coronary perfusion pressure during CPR.

Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) is a major indicator of the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in human and animal research studies, however, methods for calculating CPP differ among research groups. Here we compare the 6 published methods for calculating CPP using the same data set of aortic (Ao) and right atrial (RA) blood pressures. CPP was computed using each of the 6 calculation methods in an anesthetized pig model, instrumented with catheters with Cobe pressure transducers. Aortic and right atrial pressures were recorded continuously during electrically induced ventricular fibrillation and standard AHA CPR. CPP calculated from the same raw data set by the 6 calculation methods ranged from -1 (signifying retrograde blood flow) to 26 mmHg (mean +/- SD of 15 +/- 11 mmHg). The CPP achieved by standard closed chest CPR is typically reported as 10-20 mmHg. Within a single study the CPP values may be comparable; however, the CPP values for different studies may not be a reliable indicator of the efficacy of a given CPR method. Electronically derived true mean coronary perfusion pressure is arguably the gold standard method for representing coronary perfusion pressure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3D Bioprinting of a Tissue Engineered Human Heart Tissue-Mimicking Materials for Cardiac Imaging Phantom—Section 2: From Fabrication to Optimization Square Root Design for Natural Frequency Module of Dynamic ECG Features—a Preliminary Study Tissue-Mimicking Materials for Cardiac Imaging Phantom—Section 1: From Conception to Materials Selection Biopolymers as Potential Carrier for Effervescent Reaction Based Drug Delivery System in Gastrointestinal Condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1