囊性纤维化患者远程医疗内分泌护理的满意度及关注。

Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2022-03-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2021.0053
Rahat Ahmed, Margaret Greenfield, Christopher P Morley, Marisa Desimone
{"title":"囊性纤维化患者远程医疗内分泌护理的满意度及关注。","authors":"Rahat Ahmed,&nbsp;Margaret Greenfield,&nbsp;Christopher P Morley,&nbsp;Marisa Desimone","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with chronic health conditions are at high risk for severe COVID-19 infections, making telemedicine for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) particularly relevant. There are limited data regarding provider perspectives on caring for patients with CF using telemedicine, particularly for those with CFRD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were administered to patients with CF (with and without CFRD) and to adult and pediatric endocrinologists who specialize in CF. Data were collected using Research Electronic Data Capture; <i>t</i>-tests were used to compare total mean scores of Likert scale questions. The differences in responses were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test. Variables were assessed for normality and we performed the Mann-Whitney test. No change in the results of the hypothesis test was found. All results were analyzed using SPSS version 27.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients (<i>n</i> = 9 CFRD) and 21 providers responded. Both groups reported high satisfaction with telemedicine overall (83.3%; 71.4%), convenience (94.4%; 85.7%), and adequate time during the visit (94.4%; 76.2%), and the majority would recommend telemedicine to others (94.4%; 95.2%). Lack of in-person examination components was of more concern to providers than patients: height/weight (<i>p</i> < 0.001), vitals (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and glycated hemoglobin (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in provider perception in treatment of CFRD compared to type 1 diabetes (T1D). Common themes of open-ended questions included ease in attending telemedicine appointments (patients) and decrease in \"no shows\" (providers).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patient and provider satisfaction with telemedicine was high. The lack of typical components of face-to-face visits was more concerning for providers when compared to patients. Provider concern regarding lack of components specific to diabetes was similar regarding CFRD and T1D.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049818/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Satisfaction and Concerns with Telemedicine Endocrine Care of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"Rahat Ahmed,&nbsp;Margaret Greenfield,&nbsp;Christopher P Morley,&nbsp;Marisa Desimone\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmr.2021.0053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with chronic health conditions are at high risk for severe COVID-19 infections, making telemedicine for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) particularly relevant. There are limited data regarding provider perspectives on caring for patients with CF using telemedicine, particularly for those with CFRD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were administered to patients with CF (with and without CFRD) and to adult and pediatric endocrinologists who specialize in CF. Data were collected using Research Electronic Data Capture; <i>t</i>-tests were used to compare total mean scores of Likert scale questions. The differences in responses were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test. Variables were assessed for normality and we performed the Mann-Whitney test. No change in the results of the hypothesis test was found. All results were analyzed using SPSS version 27.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients (<i>n</i> = 9 CFRD) and 21 providers responded. Both groups reported high satisfaction with telemedicine overall (83.3%; 71.4%), convenience (94.4%; 85.7%), and adequate time during the visit (94.4%; 76.2%), and the majority would recommend telemedicine to others (94.4%; 95.2%). Lack of in-person examination components was of more concern to providers than patients: height/weight (<i>p</i> < 0.001), vitals (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and glycated hemoglobin (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in provider perception in treatment of CFRD compared to type 1 diabetes (T1D). Common themes of open-ended questions included ease in attending telemedicine appointments (patients) and decrease in \\\"no shows\\\" (providers).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patient and provider satisfaction with telemedicine was high. The lack of typical components of face-to-face visits was more concerning for providers when compared to patients. Provider concern regarding lack of components specific to diabetes was similar regarding CFRD and T1D.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049818/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

慢性疾病患者是COVID-19严重感染的高危人群,因此对囊性纤维化(CF)和囊性纤维化相关性糖尿病(CFRD)患者进行远程医疗尤为重要。关于使用远程医疗照顾CF患者的提供者观点的数据有限,特别是对于那些患有CFRD的患者。方法:对CF患者(伴有或不伴有CFRD)以及CF专业的成人和儿科内分泌学家进行调查。使用研究电子数据采集收集数据;采用t检验比较李克特量表问题的总平均得分。反应的差异采用单向方差分析,然后采用Tukey's Honest显著差异检验。对变量进行正态性评估,并进行Mann-Whitney检验。假设检验的结果没有变化。所有结果均采用SPSS第27版进行分析。结果:18名患者(n = 9名CFRD)和21名提供者有反应。两组受访者对远程医疗的总体满意度都很高(83.3%;71.4%),便利(94.4%;85.7%),访问期间有足够的时间(94.4%;76.2%),大多数人会向他人推荐远程医疗(94.4%;95.2%)。医生比病人更关心的是缺乏面对面的检查内容:身高/体重(p p p)讨论:病人和医生对远程医疗的满意度很高。与患者相比,缺乏面对面访问的典型组成部分对提供者来说更令人担忧。供应商对缺乏糖尿病特异性成分的担忧与CFRD和T1D相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Satisfaction and Concerns with Telemedicine Endocrine Care of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.

Introduction: Patients with chronic health conditions are at high risk for severe COVID-19 infections, making telemedicine for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) particularly relevant. There are limited data regarding provider perspectives on caring for patients with CF using telemedicine, particularly for those with CFRD.

Methods: Surveys were administered to patients with CF (with and without CFRD) and to adult and pediatric endocrinologists who specialize in CF. Data were collected using Research Electronic Data Capture; t-tests were used to compare total mean scores of Likert scale questions. The differences in responses were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test. Variables were assessed for normality and we performed the Mann-Whitney test. No change in the results of the hypothesis test was found. All results were analyzed using SPSS version 27.

Results: Eighteen patients (n = 9 CFRD) and 21 providers responded. Both groups reported high satisfaction with telemedicine overall (83.3%; 71.4%), convenience (94.4%; 85.7%), and adequate time during the visit (94.4%; 76.2%), and the majority would recommend telemedicine to others (94.4%; 95.2%). Lack of in-person examination components was of more concern to providers than patients: height/weight (p < 0.001), vitals (p < 0.001), and glycated hemoglobin (p < 0.001). There was no difference in provider perception in treatment of CFRD compared to type 1 diabetes (T1D). Common themes of open-ended questions included ease in attending telemedicine appointments (patients) and decrease in "no shows" (providers).

Discussion: Patient and provider satisfaction with telemedicine was high. The lack of typical components of face-to-face visits was more concerning for providers when compared to patients. Provider concern regarding lack of components specific to diabetes was similar regarding CFRD and T1D.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to : “A Prioritized Patient-Centered Research Agenda to Reduce Disparities in Telehealth Uptake:Results from a National Consensus Conference” by Kristin L. Rising et al. Telemed Report 2023;4(1): 387–395; doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0051 The Impact of Waiting Times on Behavioral Outcomes for Children with Otitis Media: Results from an Urban Ear, Nose, and Throat Telehealth Service Factors Associated with the Digital Patient Experience of Virtual Care Across Specialties. Telemedicine in Brazil: Teleconsultations at the Largest University Hospital in the Country. Achieving Digital Health Equity by Personalizing the Patient Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1