Constance Guille, Emily Johnson, Edie Douglas, Rubin Aujla, Lisa Boyars, Ryan Kruis, Rebecca Beeks, Kathryn King, Dee Ford, Katherine Sterba
{"title":"一项试点研究,考察通过远程医疗获得孕产妇心理健康和药物使用障碍治疗的机会和满意度。","authors":"Constance Guille, Emily Johnson, Edie Douglas, Rubin Aujla, Lisa Boyars, Ryan Kruis, Rebecca Beeks, Kathryn King, Dee Ford, Katherine Sterba","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Mental health (MH) and substance use disorders (SUDs) are common during pregnancy and the postpartum year, and have a significant impact on maternal and child health. Most women do not receive treatment for these conditions due to barriers to care. Increasing access to these services via telemedicine is one potential solution to overcoming barriers, but it is unknown if this type of service is acceptable to women. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient satisfaction with, and accessibility to, a maternal MH and SUD telemedicine service delivered to obstetric practices. <b>Methods:</b> The Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Satisfaction with Video Consultation were collected via online surveys. Responses were scored on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Paired <i>t</i>-tests were used to compare round trip travel time and distance between participants home and specialty clinic at an academic medical center versus their local obstetrics clinic where they received telemedicine services. <b>Results:</b> A total of 91.42% (32/35) of women agreed to take part in the study, and 43.75% (14/32) of women were living in a rural community. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the following: overall quality of care (mean [<i>M</i>] 4.66 [standard deviation, SD, 0.67]); similarity to face-to-face are (<i>M</i> 4.69 [SD 0.63]); and access to care (<i>M</i> 4.47 [SD 0.81]). Compared with in-person care at an academic medical center, women receiving care via telemedicine spent significantly less time (67.44 minutes vs. 256.31 minutes, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and distance (50.33 miles vs. 236.06 miles, <i>p</i> < 0.001) traveling round trip. <b>Conclusions:</b> Women receiving MH and SUD treatment via telemedicine within their obstetrician's office report high levels of satisfaction and increased access to care with this modality of treatment delivery. Telemedicine may provide one solution to removing barriers to care and mitigating the maternal and child risks associated with of untreated MH and SUDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"24-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Study Examining Access to and Satisfaction with Maternal Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Treatment via Telemedicine.\",\"authors\":\"Constance Guille, Emily Johnson, Edie Douglas, Rubin Aujla, Lisa Boyars, Ryan Kruis, Rebecca Beeks, Kathryn King, Dee Ford, Katherine Sterba\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmr.2021.0041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Mental health (MH) and substance use disorders (SUDs) are common during pregnancy and the postpartum year, and have a significant impact on maternal and child health. Most women do not receive treatment for these conditions due to barriers to care. Increasing access to these services via telemedicine is one potential solution to overcoming barriers, but it is unknown if this type of service is acceptable to women. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient satisfaction with, and accessibility to, a maternal MH and SUD telemedicine service delivered to obstetric practices. <b>Methods:</b> The Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Satisfaction with Video Consultation were collected via online surveys. Responses were scored on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Paired <i>t</i>-tests were used to compare round trip travel time and distance between participants home and specialty clinic at an academic medical center versus their local obstetrics clinic where they received telemedicine services. <b>Results:</b> A total of 91.42% (32/35) of women agreed to take part in the study, and 43.75% (14/32) of women were living in a rural community. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the following: overall quality of care (mean [<i>M</i>] 4.66 [standard deviation, SD, 0.67]); similarity to face-to-face are (<i>M</i> 4.69 [SD 0.63]); and access to care (<i>M</i> 4.47 [SD 0.81]). Compared with in-person care at an academic medical center, women receiving care via telemedicine spent significantly less time (67.44 minutes vs. 256.31 minutes, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and distance (50.33 miles vs. 236.06 miles, <i>p</i> < 0.001) traveling round trip. <b>Conclusions:</b> Women receiving MH and SUD treatment via telemedicine within their obstetrician's office report high levels of satisfaction and increased access to care with this modality of treatment delivery. Telemedicine may provide one solution to removing barriers to care and mitigating the maternal and child risks associated with of untreated MH and SUDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"24-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989094/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:心理健康(MH)和药物使用障碍(SUD)是孕期和产后的常见疾病,对母婴健康有重大影响。由于护理方面的障碍,大多数妇女无法接受这些疾病的治疗。通过远程医疗增加获得这些服务的机会是克服障碍的一个潜在解决方案,但妇女是否能接受这种类型的服务尚不得而知。本研究旨在评估患者对产科诊所提供的孕产妇 MH 和 SUD 远程医疗服务的满意度和可及性。方法:通过在线调查收集 "远程医疗满意度问卷 "和 "视频咨询患者满意度评估问卷"。回答采用 5 点李克特量表,从非常不同意(1)到非常同意(5)。使用配对 t 检验比较了参与者家和学术医疗中心专科诊所与接受远程医疗服务的当地产科诊所之间的往返旅行时间和距离。结果:共有 91.42%(32/35)的妇女同意参加这项研究,其中 43.75%(14/32)的妇女居住在农村社区。患者对以下方面的满意度较高:医疗服务的整体质量(平均值 [M] 4.66 [标准差,SD,0.67]);与面对面医疗服务的相似性(平均值 4.69 [标准差 0.63]);医疗服务的可及性(平均值 4.47 [标准差 0.81])。与在学术医疗中心接受面对面治疗相比,通过远程医疗接受治疗的女性花费的时间明显更少(67.44 分钟 vs. 256.31 分钟,p p 结论:与在学术医疗中心接受面对面治疗相比,通过远程医疗接受治疗的女性花费的时间明显更少(67.44 分钟 vs. 256.31 分钟,p p):在产科医生诊室通过远程医疗接受精神健康和药物滥用治疗的妇女对这种治疗方式的满意度很高,而且获得治疗的机会也增加了。远程医疗可能是消除护理障碍、降低与未经治疗的精神障碍和药物依赖相关的母婴风险的一种解决方案。
A Pilot Study Examining Access to and Satisfaction with Maternal Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Treatment via Telemedicine.
Background: Mental health (MH) and substance use disorders (SUDs) are common during pregnancy and the postpartum year, and have a significant impact on maternal and child health. Most women do not receive treatment for these conditions due to barriers to care. Increasing access to these services via telemedicine is one potential solution to overcoming barriers, but it is unknown if this type of service is acceptable to women. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient satisfaction with, and accessibility to, a maternal MH and SUD telemedicine service delivered to obstetric practices. Methods: The Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Satisfaction with Video Consultation were collected via online surveys. Responses were scored on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Paired t-tests were used to compare round trip travel time and distance between participants home and specialty clinic at an academic medical center versus their local obstetrics clinic where they received telemedicine services. Results: A total of 91.42% (32/35) of women agreed to take part in the study, and 43.75% (14/32) of women were living in a rural community. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the following: overall quality of care (mean [M] 4.66 [standard deviation, SD, 0.67]); similarity to face-to-face are (M 4.69 [SD 0.63]); and access to care (M 4.47 [SD 0.81]). Compared with in-person care at an academic medical center, women receiving care via telemedicine spent significantly less time (67.44 minutes vs. 256.31 minutes, p < 0.001) and distance (50.33 miles vs. 236.06 miles, p < 0.001) traveling round trip. Conclusions: Women receiving MH and SUD treatment via telemedicine within their obstetrician's office report high levels of satisfaction and increased access to care with this modality of treatment delivery. Telemedicine may provide one solution to removing barriers to care and mitigating the maternal and child risks associated with of untreated MH and SUDs.