COVID-19大流行期间远程医疗利用:初步选择性审查

Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2022-02-03 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2021.0040
Amelia Harju, Jonathan Neufeld
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间远程医疗利用:初步选择性审查","authors":"Amelia Harju,&nbsp;Jonathan Neufeld","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic reduced in-person visit volume and fueled a corresponding explosion in demand for telehealth services, resulting in the enactment of several temporary state and federal policies to allow greater flexibility in delivering telehealth services. This review examines patterns in telehealth utilization during the pandemic by synthesizing available findings from large-scale studies. <b>Methods:</b> To be included in this review, studies must be of original research, include data from 2020 or 2021, have a U.S. study population, and analyze telehealth encounter data across multiple payers and health systems. This review includes 10 studies that fully met the inclusion criteria and 29 studies that examined telehealth use during the pandemic, although not from multipayer, multihealth system data sets. All studies were identified using Ovid MEDLINE and Google Scholar. <b>Results:</b> At its peak, telehealth accounted for roughly 15-50% of visits across the various studied populations and data sets. The more telehealth was utilized, the smaller the decrease in overall visit volume. Audio visits tended to be used more often than video visits, and telehealth utilization varied across geographic regions and medical specialties. There were disparities in telehealth use by race, age, income, and other factors. <b>Discussion:</b> Most telehealth visits during the pandemic would not have been reimbursable without the telehealth policy changes that took place. The variability in telehealth utilization across geographic regions is likely attributed to state-level telehealth policies. Most studies examining disparities in telehealth utilization did not compare disparities from before and during the pandemic, and these disparities may be a characteristic of health care overall rather than of telehealth specifically.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989093/pdf/","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telehealth Utilization During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Preliminary Selective Review.\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Harju,&nbsp;Jonathan Neufeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmr.2021.0040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic reduced in-person visit volume and fueled a corresponding explosion in demand for telehealth services, resulting in the enactment of several temporary state and federal policies to allow greater flexibility in delivering telehealth services. This review examines patterns in telehealth utilization during the pandemic by synthesizing available findings from large-scale studies. <b>Methods:</b> To be included in this review, studies must be of original research, include data from 2020 or 2021, have a U.S. study population, and analyze telehealth encounter data across multiple payers and health systems. This review includes 10 studies that fully met the inclusion criteria and 29 studies that examined telehealth use during the pandemic, although not from multipayer, multihealth system data sets. All studies were identified using Ovid MEDLINE and Google Scholar. <b>Results:</b> At its peak, telehealth accounted for roughly 15-50% of visits across the various studied populations and data sets. The more telehealth was utilized, the smaller the decrease in overall visit volume. Audio visits tended to be used more often than video visits, and telehealth utilization varied across geographic regions and medical specialties. There were disparities in telehealth use by race, age, income, and other factors. <b>Discussion:</b> Most telehealth visits during the pandemic would not have been reimbursable without the telehealth policy changes that took place. The variability in telehealth utilization across geographic regions is likely attributed to state-level telehealth policies. Most studies examining disparities in telehealth utilization did not compare disparities from before and during the pandemic, and these disparities may be a characteristic of health care overall rather than of telehealth specifically.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989093/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行减少了亲自就诊人数,并导致对远程医疗服务的需求相应激增,从而颁布了几项州和联邦临时政策,以便在提供远程医疗服务方面具有更大的灵活性。本综述通过综合大规模研究的现有结果,审查了大流行期间远程医疗利用的模式。方法:要纳入本综述,研究必须是原创研究,包括2020年或2021年的数据,有美国研究人群,并分析多个支付方和卫生系统的远程医疗就诊数据。本综述包括10项完全符合纳入标准的研究和29项调查大流行期间远程医疗使用情况的研究,尽管这些研究并非来自多付款人、多卫生系统数据集。所有研究均通过Ovid MEDLINE和Google Scholar进行鉴定。结果:在高峰时期,远程医疗约占各种研究人群和数据集就诊的15-50%。使用的远程医疗越多,总访问量的下降幅度就越小。语音问诊往往比视频问诊更常被使用,远程保健的利用因地理区域和医学专业而异。远程医疗的使用因种族、年龄、收入和其他因素而存在差异。讨论:如果没有发生的远程医疗政策变化,大流行期间的大多数远程医疗就诊是无法报销的。不同地理区域间远程医疗利用的差异可能归因于州一级的远程医疗政策。大多数审查远程医疗利用差异的研究没有比较大流行之前和期间的差异,这些差异可能是整个医疗保健的一个特点,而不是具体的远程医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telehealth Utilization During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Preliminary Selective Review.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic reduced in-person visit volume and fueled a corresponding explosion in demand for telehealth services, resulting in the enactment of several temporary state and federal policies to allow greater flexibility in delivering telehealth services. This review examines patterns in telehealth utilization during the pandemic by synthesizing available findings from large-scale studies. Methods: To be included in this review, studies must be of original research, include data from 2020 or 2021, have a U.S. study population, and analyze telehealth encounter data across multiple payers and health systems. This review includes 10 studies that fully met the inclusion criteria and 29 studies that examined telehealth use during the pandemic, although not from multipayer, multihealth system data sets. All studies were identified using Ovid MEDLINE and Google Scholar. Results: At its peak, telehealth accounted for roughly 15-50% of visits across the various studied populations and data sets. The more telehealth was utilized, the smaller the decrease in overall visit volume. Audio visits tended to be used more often than video visits, and telehealth utilization varied across geographic regions and medical specialties. There were disparities in telehealth use by race, age, income, and other factors. Discussion: Most telehealth visits during the pandemic would not have been reimbursable without the telehealth policy changes that took place. The variability in telehealth utilization across geographic regions is likely attributed to state-level telehealth policies. Most studies examining disparities in telehealth utilization did not compare disparities from before and during the pandemic, and these disparities may be a characteristic of health care overall rather than of telehealth specifically.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to : “A Prioritized Patient-Centered Research Agenda to Reduce Disparities in Telehealth Uptake:Results from a National Consensus Conference” by Kristin L. Rising et al. Telemed Report 2023;4(1): 387–395; doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0051 The Impact of Waiting Times on Behavioral Outcomes for Children with Otitis Media: Results from an Urban Ear, Nose, and Throat Telehealth Service Factors Associated with the Digital Patient Experience of Virtual Care Across Specialties. Telemedicine in Brazil: Teleconsultations at the Largest University Hospital in the Country. Achieving Digital Health Equity by Personalizing the Patient Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1