t细胞淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤和t细胞急性淋巴母细胞白血病:一个独立的实体?

Dieter Hoelzer , Nicola Gökbuget
{"title":"t细胞淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤和t细胞急性淋巴母细胞白血病:一个独立的实体?","authors":"Dieter Hoelzer ,&nbsp;Nicola Gökbuget","doi":"10.3816/CLM.2009.s.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) are considered the same disease, differing by the extent of bone marrow infiltration. According to recent gene expression profiling data, T-ALL and T-LBL can be separated by prediction analysis of microarrays showing an overexpression of MML1 in T-LBL and CD47 in T-ALL. Immunophenotypes of T-LBL and T-ALL are identical but differ in frequency, with a higher rate of cortical or mature immunophenotypes in T-LBL, which is probably related to the higher rate (&gt; 90%) of mediastinal tumors. Treatment approaches in T-LBL changed from conventional non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) protocols to intensive NHL protocols but recently to ALL-designed protocols. T-ALL remission rates are 90%, and overall survival (OS) has improved to 60%–70%. Mediastinal tumors resolve in most cases of T-ALL with chemotherapy only, whereas in T-LBL additional mediastinal irradiation seems to be beneficial. Strategies for stem cell transplantation (SCT) in T-LBL and T-ALL differ. Autologous SCT in complete remission (CR) in T-LBL gives a 70% survival rate, which is similar to chemotherapy alone. In T-ALL, the subtypes of early and mature T-ALL have a poor outcome with chemotherapy alone (&lt; 30%) and might profit from an allogeneic transplantation in first CR (OS &gt; 50%). There seems to be no need for transplantation in thymic T-ALL in first CR. Prognostic factors are published for T-ALL but not for T-LBL. MRD may guide further treatment strategies in T-ALL and probably also in T-LBL as indications for a SCT or for the evaluation of novel, particularly T-cell–specific, drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100272,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages S214-S221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3816/CLM.2009.s.015","citationCount":"69","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma and T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Separate Entity?\",\"authors\":\"Dieter Hoelzer ,&nbsp;Nicola Gökbuget\",\"doi\":\"10.3816/CLM.2009.s.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) are considered the same disease, differing by the extent of bone marrow infiltration. According to recent gene expression profiling data, T-ALL and T-LBL can be separated by prediction analysis of microarrays showing an overexpression of MML1 in T-LBL and CD47 in T-ALL. Immunophenotypes of T-LBL and T-ALL are identical but differ in frequency, with a higher rate of cortical or mature immunophenotypes in T-LBL, which is probably related to the higher rate (&gt; 90%) of mediastinal tumors. Treatment approaches in T-LBL changed from conventional non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) protocols to intensive NHL protocols but recently to ALL-designed protocols. T-ALL remission rates are 90%, and overall survival (OS) has improved to 60%–70%. Mediastinal tumors resolve in most cases of T-ALL with chemotherapy only, whereas in T-LBL additional mediastinal irradiation seems to be beneficial. Strategies for stem cell transplantation (SCT) in T-LBL and T-ALL differ. Autologous SCT in complete remission (CR) in T-LBL gives a 70% survival rate, which is similar to chemotherapy alone. In T-ALL, the subtypes of early and mature T-ALL have a poor outcome with chemotherapy alone (&lt; 30%) and might profit from an allogeneic transplantation in first CR (OS &gt; 50%). There seems to be no need for transplantation in thymic T-ALL in first CR. Prognostic factors are published for T-ALL but not for T-LBL. MRD may guide further treatment strategies in T-ALL and probably also in T-LBL as indications for a SCT or for the evaluation of novel, particularly T-cell–specific, drugs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Pages S214-S221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3816/CLM.2009.s.015\",\"citationCount\":\"69\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557919011703432\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557919011703432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 69

摘要

t细胞急性淋巴母细胞白血病(T-ALL)和t细胞淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤(T-LBL)被认为是同一种疾病,只是骨髓浸润程度不同。根据最近的基因表达谱数据,T-ALL和T-LBL可以通过微阵列预测分析分离,显示T-LBL中MML1过表达,T-ALL中CD47过表达。T-LBL和T-ALL的免疫表型相同,但频率不同,T-LBL中皮层型或成熟型免疫表型的比例更高,这可能与T-LBL中更高的比例(>90%)的纵隔肿瘤。T-LBL的治疗方法从传统的非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)方案转变为强化的NHL方案,但最近又转变为all设计的方案。T-ALL缓解率为90%,总生存率(OS)提高至60%-70%。在大多数T-ALL病例中,纵隔肿瘤仅通过化疗解决,而在T-LBL中,额外的纵隔照射似乎是有益的。T-LBL和T-ALL的干细胞移植(SCT)策略不同。T-LBL完全缓解(CR)的自体SCT生存率为70%,与单纯化疗相似。在T-ALL中,早期和成熟T-ALL亚型单独化疗的预后较差(<30%),并可能从首次CR的同种异体移植中获益(OS >50%)。在首次CR中,胸腺T-ALL似乎不需要移植。T-ALL的预后因素已公布,但T-LBL的预后因素未公布。MRD可以指导T-ALL和T-LBL的进一步治疗策略,作为SCT的适应症或评估新型药物,特别是t细胞特异性药物的适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma and T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Separate Entity?

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) are considered the same disease, differing by the extent of bone marrow infiltration. According to recent gene expression profiling data, T-ALL and T-LBL can be separated by prediction analysis of microarrays showing an overexpression of MML1 in T-LBL and CD47 in T-ALL. Immunophenotypes of T-LBL and T-ALL are identical but differ in frequency, with a higher rate of cortical or mature immunophenotypes in T-LBL, which is probably related to the higher rate (> 90%) of mediastinal tumors. Treatment approaches in T-LBL changed from conventional non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) protocols to intensive NHL protocols but recently to ALL-designed protocols. T-ALL remission rates are 90%, and overall survival (OS) has improved to 60%–70%. Mediastinal tumors resolve in most cases of T-ALL with chemotherapy only, whereas in T-LBL additional mediastinal irradiation seems to be beneficial. Strategies for stem cell transplantation (SCT) in T-LBL and T-ALL differ. Autologous SCT in complete remission (CR) in T-LBL gives a 70% survival rate, which is similar to chemotherapy alone. In T-ALL, the subtypes of early and mature T-ALL have a poor outcome with chemotherapy alone (< 30%) and might profit from an allogeneic transplantation in first CR (OS > 50%). There seems to be no need for transplantation in thymic T-ALL in first CR. Prognostic factors are published for T-ALL but not for T-LBL. MRD may guide further treatment strategies in T-ALL and probably also in T-LBL as indications for a SCT or for the evaluation of novel, particularly T-cell–specific, drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bing-Neel Syndrome: A Case Report and Systematic Review of Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options The Next Generation of Therapies for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Where Do We Go Now? Standard Management of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Brazilian Experience Using High-Dose Sequential Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1