Shalini Singh, Nomita Chandhiok, Balwan Singh Dhillon
{"title":"印度的产科瘘:目前的情况。","authors":"Shalini Singh, Nomita Chandhiok, Balwan Singh Dhillon","doi":"10.1007/s00192-009-1000-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>India lacks prevalence and incidence data on obstetric fistula, a near miss maternal mortality.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Retrospective data were collected on obstetric fistula cases from hospital records of 24 tertiary care facilities during the period 2000-2006.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 717 women underwent genital fistula repair, but medical records could be retrieved for only 401 (56%) cases. States of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal had more than 100 cases each, while Karnataka had none. Obstructed labor caused nearly 97% of genital fistulae while pelvic surgery and accidental trauma contributed to 1.5% cases each. Commonest type of fistula was genitourinary (86.6%), others included rectovaginal (12.1%) and both genitourinary and rectovaginal fistulae (1.2%). Fistula repair was attempted in 322 (83%) cases of whom 289 (89.71%) were successfully repaired.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a need for ongoing systematic data collection mechanism like a fistula registry that would provide facility-based prevalence and incidence, time trends, and changes in etiology of fistula. This information could be used for implementation of prevention and treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73495,"journal":{"name":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":" ","pages":"1403-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-1000-0","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstetric fistula in India: current scenario.\",\"authors\":\"Shalini Singh, Nomita Chandhiok, Balwan Singh Dhillon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-009-1000-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>India lacks prevalence and incidence data on obstetric fistula, a near miss maternal mortality.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Retrospective data were collected on obstetric fistula cases from hospital records of 24 tertiary care facilities during the period 2000-2006.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 717 women underwent genital fistula repair, but medical records could be retrieved for only 401 (56%) cases. States of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal had more than 100 cases each, while Karnataka had none. Obstructed labor caused nearly 97% of genital fistulae while pelvic surgery and accidental trauma contributed to 1.5% cases each. Commonest type of fistula was genitourinary (86.6%), others included rectovaginal (12.1%) and both genitourinary and rectovaginal fistulae (1.2%). Fistula repair was attempted in 322 (83%) cases of whom 289 (89.71%) were successfully repaired.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a need for ongoing systematic data collection mechanism like a fistula registry that would provide facility-based prevalence and incidence, time trends, and changes in etiology of fistula. This information could be used for implementation of prevention and treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1403-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-1000-0\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1000-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2009/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1000-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: India lacks prevalence and incidence data on obstetric fistula, a near miss maternal mortality.
Methodology: Retrospective data were collected on obstetric fistula cases from hospital records of 24 tertiary care facilities during the period 2000-2006.
Results: Overall, 717 women underwent genital fistula repair, but medical records could be retrieved for only 401 (56%) cases. States of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal had more than 100 cases each, while Karnataka had none. Obstructed labor caused nearly 97% of genital fistulae while pelvic surgery and accidental trauma contributed to 1.5% cases each. Commonest type of fistula was genitourinary (86.6%), others included rectovaginal (12.1%) and both genitourinary and rectovaginal fistulae (1.2%). Fistula repair was attempted in 322 (83%) cases of whom 289 (89.71%) were successfully repaired.
Conclusions: There is a need for ongoing systematic data collection mechanism like a fistula registry that would provide facility-based prevalence and incidence, time trends, and changes in etiology of fistula. This information could be used for implementation of prevention and treatment strategies.