基于模型预测患者对肾上腺素的特异性反应。

The open medical informatics journal Pub Date : 2010-01-01 Epub Date: 2010-07-29 DOI:10.2174/1874431101004010149
J Geoffrey Chase, Christina Starfinger, Christopher E Hann, James A Revie, Dave Stevenson, Geoffrey M Shaw, Thomas Desaive
{"title":"基于模型预测患者对肾上腺素的特异性反应。","authors":"J Geoffrey Chase, Christina Starfinger, Christopher E Hann, James A Revie, Dave Stevenson, Geoffrey M Shaw, Thomas Desaive","doi":"10.2174/1874431101004010149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A model for the cardiovascular and circulatory systems has previously been validated in simulated cardiac and circulatory disease states. It has also been shown to accurately capture the main hemodynamic trends in porcine models of pulmonary embolism and PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) titrations at different volemic levels. In this research, the existing model and parameter identification process are used to study the effect of different adrenaline doses in healthy and critically ill patient populations, and to develop a means of predicting the hemodynamic response to adrenaline. The hemodynamic effects on arterial blood pressures and stroke volume (cardiac index) are simulated in the model and adrenaline-specific parameters are identified. The dose dependent changes in these parameters are then related to adrenaline dose using data from studies published in the literature. These relationships are then used to predict the future, patient-specific response to a change in dose or over time periods from 1-12 hours. The results are compared to data from 3 published adrenaline dosing studies comprising a total of 37 data sets. Absolute percentage errors for the identified model are within 10% when re-simulated and compared to clinical data for all cases. All identified parameter trends match clinically expected changes. Absolute percentage errors for the predicted hemodynamic responses (N=15) are also within 10% when re-simulated and compared to clinical data. Clinically accurate prediction of the effect of inotropic circulatory support drugs, such as adrenaline, offers significant potential for this type of model-based application. Overall, this work represents a further clinical, proof of concept, of the underlying fundamental mathematical model, methods and approach, as well as providing a template for using the model in clinical titration of adrenaline in a decision support role in critical care. They are thus a further justification in support of upcoming human clinical trials to validate this model.</p>","PeriodicalId":88331,"journal":{"name":"The open medical informatics journal","volume":" ","pages":"149-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0a/3b/TOMINFOJ-4-149.PMC3098554.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model-based prediction of the patient-specific response to adrenaline.\",\"authors\":\"J Geoffrey Chase, Christina Starfinger, Christopher E Hann, James A Revie, Dave Stevenson, Geoffrey M Shaw, Thomas Desaive\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874431101004010149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A model for the cardiovascular and circulatory systems has previously been validated in simulated cardiac and circulatory disease states. It has also been shown to accurately capture the main hemodynamic trends in porcine models of pulmonary embolism and PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) titrations at different volemic levels. In this research, the existing model and parameter identification process are used to study the effect of different adrenaline doses in healthy and critically ill patient populations, and to develop a means of predicting the hemodynamic response to adrenaline. The hemodynamic effects on arterial blood pressures and stroke volume (cardiac index) are simulated in the model and adrenaline-specific parameters are identified. The dose dependent changes in these parameters are then related to adrenaline dose using data from studies published in the literature. These relationships are then used to predict the future, patient-specific response to a change in dose or over time periods from 1-12 hours. The results are compared to data from 3 published adrenaline dosing studies comprising a total of 37 data sets. Absolute percentage errors for the identified model are within 10% when re-simulated and compared to clinical data for all cases. All identified parameter trends match clinically expected changes. Absolute percentage errors for the predicted hemodynamic responses (N=15) are also within 10% when re-simulated and compared to clinical data. Clinically accurate prediction of the effect of inotropic circulatory support drugs, such as adrenaline, offers significant potential for this type of model-based application. Overall, this work represents a further clinical, proof of concept, of the underlying fundamental mathematical model, methods and approach, as well as providing a template for using the model in clinical titration of adrenaline in a decision support role in critical care. They are thus a further justification in support of upcoming human clinical trials to validate this model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open medical informatics journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"149-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0a/3b/TOMINFOJ-4-149.PMC3098554.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open medical informatics journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874431101004010149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2010/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open medical informatics journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874431101004010149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心血管和循环系统模型已在模拟心脏和循环系统疾病状态中得到验证。该模型还被证明能准确捕捉猪肺栓塞模型和不同血压水平下 PEEP(呼气末正压)滴定的主要血流动力学趋势。在这项研究中,现有模型和参数识别过程被用于研究不同肾上腺素剂量对健康和危重病人群体的影响,并开发出一种预测肾上腺素血流动力学反应的方法。该模型模拟了血液动力学对动脉血压和每搏容量(心脏指数)的影响,并确定了肾上腺素特异性参数。然后,利用文献中发表的研究数据,将这些参数的剂量依赖性变化与肾上腺素剂量联系起来。然后利用这些关系来预测未来患者对剂量变化或 1-12 小时内的特定反应。研究结果与 3 项已发表的肾上腺素剂量研究数据进行了比较,共包括 37 组数据。在对所有病例进行重新模拟并与临床数据进行比较时,所确定模型的绝对百分比误差均在 10%以内。所有确定的参数趋势都符合临床预期变化。在重新模拟并与临床数据比较时,预测血流动力学反应(N=15)的绝对百分比误差也在 10%以内。在临床上准确预测肾上腺素等肌力循环支持药物的效果,为这类基于模型的应用提供了巨大潜力。总之,这项工作是对基本数学模型、方法和途径的进一步临床概念验证,同时也为在重症监护决策支持中使用该模型进行肾上腺素临床滴定提供了模板。因此,它们进一步证明了即将开展的人体临床试验对该模型进行验证的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Model-based prediction of the patient-specific response to adrenaline.

A model for the cardiovascular and circulatory systems has previously been validated in simulated cardiac and circulatory disease states. It has also been shown to accurately capture the main hemodynamic trends in porcine models of pulmonary embolism and PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) titrations at different volemic levels. In this research, the existing model and parameter identification process are used to study the effect of different adrenaline doses in healthy and critically ill patient populations, and to develop a means of predicting the hemodynamic response to adrenaline. The hemodynamic effects on arterial blood pressures and stroke volume (cardiac index) are simulated in the model and adrenaline-specific parameters are identified. The dose dependent changes in these parameters are then related to adrenaline dose using data from studies published in the literature. These relationships are then used to predict the future, patient-specific response to a change in dose or over time periods from 1-12 hours. The results are compared to data from 3 published adrenaline dosing studies comprising a total of 37 data sets. Absolute percentage errors for the identified model are within 10% when re-simulated and compared to clinical data for all cases. All identified parameter trends match clinically expected changes. Absolute percentage errors for the predicted hemodynamic responses (N=15) are also within 10% when re-simulated and compared to clinical data. Clinically accurate prediction of the effect of inotropic circulatory support drugs, such as adrenaline, offers significant potential for this type of model-based application. Overall, this work represents a further clinical, proof of concept, of the underlying fundamental mathematical model, methods and approach, as well as providing a template for using the model in clinical titration of adrenaline in a decision support role in critical care. They are thus a further justification in support of upcoming human clinical trials to validate this model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primary Healthcare Data Management Practice and Associated Factors: The Case of Health Extension Workers in Northwest Ethiopia Factors Impacting the Use of Terminology to Convey Diagnostic Certainty in Radiology Reports Developing a Dashboard Software for the ICUs and Studying its Impact on Reducing the Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Teleburn: Designing A Telemedicine Application to Improve Burn Treatment. A Review of Data Quality Assessment in Emergency Medical Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1