可扩展临床决策支持标准:需求、当前和新出现的标准、差距和进展建议。

The open medical informatics journal Pub Date : 2010-01-01 Epub Date: 2010-12-14 DOI:10.2174/1874431101004010235
Kensaku Kawamoto, Guilherme Del Fiol, David F Lobach, Robert A Jenders
{"title":"可扩展临床决策支持标准:需求、当前和新出现的标准、差距和进展建议。","authors":"Kensaku Kawamoto,&nbsp;Guilherme Del Fiol,&nbsp;David F Lobach,&nbsp;Robert A Jenders","doi":"10.2174/1874431101004010235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite their potential to significantly improve health care, advanced clinical decision support (CDS) capabilities are not widely available in the clinical setting. An important reason for this limited availability of CDS capabilities is the application-specific and institution-specific nature of most current CDS implementations. Thus, a critical need for enabling CDS capabilities on a much larger scale is the development and adoption of standards that enable current and emerging CDS resources to be more effectively leveraged across multiple applications and care settings. Standards required for such effective scaling of CDS include (i) standard terminologies and information models to represent and communicate about health care data; (ii) standard approaches to representing clinical knowledge in both human-readable and machine-executable formats; and (iii) standard approaches for leveraging these knowledge resources to provide CDS capabilities across various applications and care settings. A number of standards do exist or are under development to meet these needs. However, many gaps and challenges remain, including the excessive complexity of many standards; the limited availability of easily accessible knowledge resources implemented using standard approaches; and the lack of tooling and other practical resources to enable the efficient adoption of existing standards. Thus, the future development and widespread adoption of current CDS standards will depend critically on the availability of tooling, knowledge bases, and other resources that make the adoption of CDS standards not only the right approach to take, but the cost-effective path to follow given the alternative of using a traditional, ad hoc approach to implementing CDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":88331,"journal":{"name":"The open medical informatics journal","volume":" ","pages":"235-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874431101004010235","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standards for scalable clinical decision support: need, current and emerging standards, gaps, and proposal for progress.\",\"authors\":\"Kensaku Kawamoto,&nbsp;Guilherme Del Fiol,&nbsp;David F Lobach,&nbsp;Robert A Jenders\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874431101004010235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite their potential to significantly improve health care, advanced clinical decision support (CDS) capabilities are not widely available in the clinical setting. An important reason for this limited availability of CDS capabilities is the application-specific and institution-specific nature of most current CDS implementations. Thus, a critical need for enabling CDS capabilities on a much larger scale is the development and adoption of standards that enable current and emerging CDS resources to be more effectively leveraged across multiple applications and care settings. Standards required for such effective scaling of CDS include (i) standard terminologies and information models to represent and communicate about health care data; (ii) standard approaches to representing clinical knowledge in both human-readable and machine-executable formats; and (iii) standard approaches for leveraging these knowledge resources to provide CDS capabilities across various applications and care settings. A number of standards do exist or are under development to meet these needs. However, many gaps and challenges remain, including the excessive complexity of many standards; the limited availability of easily accessible knowledge resources implemented using standard approaches; and the lack of tooling and other practical resources to enable the efficient adoption of existing standards. Thus, the future development and widespread adoption of current CDS standards will depend critically on the availability of tooling, knowledge bases, and other resources that make the adoption of CDS standards not only the right approach to take, but the cost-effective path to follow given the alternative of using a traditional, ad hoc approach to implementing CDS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open medical informatics journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"235-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874431101004010235\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open medical informatics journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874431101004010235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2010/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open medical informatics journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874431101004010235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

尽管具有显著改善医疗保健的潜力,但在临床环境中尚未广泛使用先进的临床决策支持(CDS)功能。CDS功能可用性有限的一个重要原因是大多数当前CDS实现的特定于应用程序和特定于机构的性质。因此,在更大范围内启用CDS功能的一个关键需求是开发和采用标准,使当前和新兴的CDS资源能够更有效地跨多个应用程序和护理设置加以利用。有效扩展CDS所需的标准包括:(i)表示和交流医疗保健数据的标准术语和信息模型;(ii)以人类可读和机器可执行的格式表示临床知识的标准方法;(iii)利用这些知识资源的标准方法,在各种应用程序和护理环境中提供CDS功能。为了满足这些需求,已经存在或正在开发许多标准。然而,许多差距和挑战仍然存在,包括许多标准过于复杂;使用标准方法实现的易于获取的知识资源的可用性有限;并且缺乏工具和其他实用资源来有效地采用现有标准。因此,当前CDS标准的未来发展和广泛采用将严重依赖于工具、知识库和其他资源的可用性,这些资源使得采用CDS标准不仅是正确的方法,而且是考虑到使用传统的、特别的方法来实现CDS的替代方案时遵循的经济有效的路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standards for scalable clinical decision support: need, current and emerging standards, gaps, and proposal for progress.

Despite their potential to significantly improve health care, advanced clinical decision support (CDS) capabilities are not widely available in the clinical setting. An important reason for this limited availability of CDS capabilities is the application-specific and institution-specific nature of most current CDS implementations. Thus, a critical need for enabling CDS capabilities on a much larger scale is the development and adoption of standards that enable current and emerging CDS resources to be more effectively leveraged across multiple applications and care settings. Standards required for such effective scaling of CDS include (i) standard terminologies and information models to represent and communicate about health care data; (ii) standard approaches to representing clinical knowledge in both human-readable and machine-executable formats; and (iii) standard approaches for leveraging these knowledge resources to provide CDS capabilities across various applications and care settings. A number of standards do exist or are under development to meet these needs. However, many gaps and challenges remain, including the excessive complexity of many standards; the limited availability of easily accessible knowledge resources implemented using standard approaches; and the lack of tooling and other practical resources to enable the efficient adoption of existing standards. Thus, the future development and widespread adoption of current CDS standards will depend critically on the availability of tooling, knowledge bases, and other resources that make the adoption of CDS standards not only the right approach to take, but the cost-effective path to follow given the alternative of using a traditional, ad hoc approach to implementing CDS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primary Healthcare Data Management Practice and Associated Factors: The Case of Health Extension Workers in Northwest Ethiopia Factors Impacting the Use of Terminology to Convey Diagnostic Certainty in Radiology Reports Developing a Dashboard Software for the ICUs and Studying its Impact on Reducing the Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Teleburn: Designing A Telemedicine Application to Improve Burn Treatment. A Review of Data Quality Assessment in Emergency Medical Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1