腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌:技术上可行,肿瘤预后方面安全。

Moo Jun Baek
{"title":"腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌:技术上可行,肿瘤预后方面安全。","authors":"Moo Jun Baek","doi":"10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"See Article on Page 42-48 \n \nIt has already proved that laparoscopic surgery is not any less inferior to conventional open surgery in terms of its safety and efficacy to treat colon cancer [1, 2]. From this point of view, this study reviewed the outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy retrospectively as a treatment of colon cancer. The study was considered to be significant as the outcome of a single surgery although it was not the randomized prospective study with large scale of samples. In South Korea, the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer have been reported but they have not been extensive yet. Therefore, the outcomes of a single surgery such as laparoscopic right hemicolectomy performed by the author of this study are judged to be a good evidence to support the outcomes of laparoscopic surgeries. Nevertheless, this study had several flaws to demonstrate the advantages of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy perfectly comparing to conventional open right hemicolectomy. It is mainly because this study is not prospective study and there aren't control groups as well as the sample size was too small. However, data is collecting prospectively with a larger scale of sample and more solid evidence is expected to be produce with this data. In addition to this, if more surgeons are participated in researches expanding the range of subjects, more reliable evidence will be constructed.","PeriodicalId":17346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/10/1a/jksc-28-5.PMC3296943.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: technically feasible and safe to perform in terms of oncologic outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Moo Jun Baek\",\"doi\":\"10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"See Article on Page 42-48 \\n \\nIt has already proved that laparoscopic surgery is not any less inferior to conventional open surgery in terms of its safety and efficacy to treat colon cancer [1, 2]. From this point of view, this study reviewed the outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy retrospectively as a treatment of colon cancer. The study was considered to be significant as the outcome of a single surgery although it was not the randomized prospective study with large scale of samples. In South Korea, the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer have been reported but they have not been extensive yet. Therefore, the outcomes of a single surgery such as laparoscopic right hemicolectomy performed by the author of this study are judged to be a good evidence to support the outcomes of laparoscopic surgeries. Nevertheless, this study had several flaws to demonstrate the advantages of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy perfectly comparing to conventional open right hemicolectomy. It is mainly because this study is not prospective study and there aren't control groups as well as the sample size was too small. However, data is collecting prospectively with a larger scale of sample and more solid evidence is expected to be produce with this data. In addition to this, if more surgeons are participated in researches expanding the range of subjects, more reliable evidence will be constructed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/10/1a/jksc-28-5.PMC3296943.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/2/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: technically feasible and safe to perform in terms of oncologic outcomes.
See Article on Page 42-48 It has already proved that laparoscopic surgery is not any less inferior to conventional open surgery in terms of its safety and efficacy to treat colon cancer [1, 2]. From this point of view, this study reviewed the outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy retrospectively as a treatment of colon cancer. The study was considered to be significant as the outcome of a single surgery although it was not the randomized prospective study with large scale of samples. In South Korea, the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer have been reported but they have not been extensive yet. Therefore, the outcomes of a single surgery such as laparoscopic right hemicolectomy performed by the author of this study are judged to be a good evidence to support the outcomes of laparoscopic surgeries. Nevertheless, this study had several flaws to demonstrate the advantages of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy perfectly comparing to conventional open right hemicolectomy. It is mainly because this study is not prospective study and there aren't control groups as well as the sample size was too small. However, data is collecting prospectively with a larger scale of sample and more solid evidence is expected to be produce with this data. In addition to this, if more surgeons are participated in researches expanding the range of subjects, more reliable evidence will be constructed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy. Finding a new prognostic biomarker for metastatic colorectal cancer. Pelvic exenteration: surgical approaches. Association of immune status with recurrent anal condylomata in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients. Analysis of risk factors for the development of incisional and parastomal hernias in patients after colorectal surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1