CAD-CAM铣削氧化锆陶瓷在人牙本质上的表面形貌和结合强度:烧结前后表面处理的影响

IF 1.68 Q2 Dentistry Applied Adhesion Science Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1186/s40563-018-0110-7
Fabiane Carneiro Lopes, Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb, Lívia Bueno Campi, Roberto Ferreira Roselino, Érica Alves Gomes, Volni Augusto Canevese, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira, Aloísio Oro Spazzin, Manoel Damião de Sousa-Neto
{"title":"CAD-CAM铣削氧化锆陶瓷在人牙本质上的表面形貌和结合强度:烧结前后表面处理的影响","authors":"Fabiane Carneiro Lopes,&nbsp;Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb,&nbsp;Lívia Bueno Campi,&nbsp;Roberto Ferreira Roselino,&nbsp;Érica Alves Gomes,&nbsp;Volni Augusto Canevese,&nbsp;Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira,&nbsp;Aloísio Oro Spazzin,&nbsp;Manoel Damião de Sousa-Neto","doi":"10.1186/s40563-018-0110-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study was to investigate whether different surface treatments, executed before and after the sintering process, affect the surface characteristics (roughness and morphology) and shear bond strength of computer-aided design–computer-aided manufacturing (CAD–CAM) milled zirconia luted with self-adhesive resin cement onto human dentin. Sixty-four rectangular zirconia slabs (6?×?8.5?×?2.3?mm thickness) were prepared using the CAD–CAM system and randomly distributed into two groups according to the moment of treatment, before and after sintering, and four subgroups according to the surface treatment (n?=?8): C (untreated; control), AO (aluminum oxide air abrasion), GB (glass beads air abrasion), and HA (etching with hydrofluoric acid). The samples were evaluated using a confocal laser microscope to assess the surface roughness and morphology. For the shear bond strength test, the milled zirconia was cemented onto dentin slabs using self-adhesive resin cement and submitted to the test in a universal testing machine. Data were submitted to a two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (<i>p</i>?&lt;?0.05). The surface roughness was always higher for the samples treated before sintering (highest roughness in the GB group). When treatment was employed after sintering, there was no difference between the subgroups. The shear bond strength analysis showed that the adhesion was greater when the treatment was employed after sintering, where groups AO, HA, and GB showed similar bond strength, higher than group C. Thus, it is concluded that regardless of the treatment performed, the bond strength is greater when zirconia is treated after sintering, while the surface roughness is greater before sintering.</p>","PeriodicalId":464,"journal":{"name":"Applied Adhesion Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6800,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-018-0110-7","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surface topography and bond strength of CAD–CAM milled zirconia ceramic luted onto human dentin: effect of surface treatments before and after sintering\",\"authors\":\"Fabiane Carneiro Lopes,&nbsp;Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb,&nbsp;Lívia Bueno Campi,&nbsp;Roberto Ferreira Roselino,&nbsp;Érica Alves Gomes,&nbsp;Volni Augusto Canevese,&nbsp;Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira,&nbsp;Aloísio Oro Spazzin,&nbsp;Manoel Damião de Sousa-Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40563-018-0110-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The purpose of this study was to investigate whether different surface treatments, executed before and after the sintering process, affect the surface characteristics (roughness and morphology) and shear bond strength of computer-aided design–computer-aided manufacturing (CAD–CAM) milled zirconia luted with self-adhesive resin cement onto human dentin. Sixty-four rectangular zirconia slabs (6?×?8.5?×?2.3?mm thickness) were prepared using the CAD–CAM system and randomly distributed into two groups according to the moment of treatment, before and after sintering, and four subgroups according to the surface treatment (n?=?8): C (untreated; control), AO (aluminum oxide air abrasion), GB (glass beads air abrasion), and HA (etching with hydrofluoric acid). The samples were evaluated using a confocal laser microscope to assess the surface roughness and morphology. For the shear bond strength test, the milled zirconia was cemented onto dentin slabs using self-adhesive resin cement and submitted to the test in a universal testing machine. Data were submitted to a two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (<i>p</i>?&lt;?0.05). The surface roughness was always higher for the samples treated before sintering (highest roughness in the GB group). When treatment was employed after sintering, there was no difference between the subgroups. The shear bond strength analysis showed that the adhesion was greater when the treatment was employed after sintering, where groups AO, HA, and GB showed similar bond strength, higher than group C. Thus, it is concluded that regardless of the treatment performed, the bond strength is greater when zirconia is treated after sintering, while the surface roughness is greater before sintering.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6800,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-018-0110-7\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-018-0110-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Adhesion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-018-0110-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本研究的目的是研究烧结前后不同的表面处理是否会影响计算机辅助设计-计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)自粘树脂水泥磨氧化锆与人牙本质的表面特性(粗糙度和形貌)和剪切结合强度。64块矩形氧化锆板(6英寸× 8.5英寸× 2.3英寸)采用CAD-CAM系统制备,并根据处理时刻、烧结前后随机分为两组,根据表面处理情况随机分为4个亚组(n = 8): C组(未经处理;AO(氧化铝空气磨损)、GB(玻璃微珠空气磨损)、HA(氢氟酸蚀刻)。使用共聚焦激光显微镜评估样品的表面粗糙度和形貌。剪切强度试验采用自粘树脂水泥将磨后的氧化锆胶结在牙本质板上,并在万能试验机中进行试验。数据采用双因素方差分析和Tukey检验(p <?0.05)。烧结前处理的样品表面粗糙度始终较高(GB组粗糙度最高)。烧结后再进行处理,亚组间无差异。剪切结合强度分析表明,氧化锆烧结后进行处理,附着力更强,其中AO组、HA组和GB组的结合强度相似,均高于c组。由此可见,无论进行何种处理,氧化锆烧结后处理的结合强度更大,而烧结前的表面粗糙度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surface topography and bond strength of CAD–CAM milled zirconia ceramic luted onto human dentin: effect of surface treatments before and after sintering

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether different surface treatments, executed before and after the sintering process, affect the surface characteristics (roughness and morphology) and shear bond strength of computer-aided design–computer-aided manufacturing (CAD–CAM) milled zirconia luted with self-adhesive resin cement onto human dentin. Sixty-four rectangular zirconia slabs (6?×?8.5?×?2.3?mm thickness) were prepared using the CAD–CAM system and randomly distributed into two groups according to the moment of treatment, before and after sintering, and four subgroups according to the surface treatment (n?=?8): C (untreated; control), AO (aluminum oxide air abrasion), GB (glass beads air abrasion), and HA (etching with hydrofluoric acid). The samples were evaluated using a confocal laser microscope to assess the surface roughness and morphology. For the shear bond strength test, the milled zirconia was cemented onto dentin slabs using self-adhesive resin cement and submitted to the test in a universal testing machine. Data were submitted to a two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p?<?0.05). The surface roughness was always higher for the samples treated before sintering (highest roughness in the GB group). When treatment was employed after sintering, there was no difference between the subgroups. The shear bond strength analysis showed that the adhesion was greater when the treatment was employed after sintering, where groups AO, HA, and GB showed similar bond strength, higher than group C. Thus, it is concluded that regardless of the treatment performed, the bond strength is greater when zirconia is treated after sintering, while the surface roughness is greater before sintering.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Adhesion Science
Applied Adhesion Science Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Adhesion Science focuses on practical applications of adhesives, with special emphasis in fields such as oil industry, aerospace and biomedicine. Topics related to the phenomena of adhesion and the application of adhesive materials are welcome, especially in biomedical areas such as adhesive dentistry. Both theoretical and experimental works are considered for publication. Applied Adhesion Science is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal''s open access policy offers a fast publication workflow whilst maintaining rigorous peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Effect of interface-active proteins on the salt crystal size in waterborne hybrid materials Mechanical properties of unmodified and montmorillonite-modified epoxy compounds. Part I: compression test Influence of biobased polyol type on the properties of polyurethane hotmelt adhesives for footwear joints In vitro antibacterial effect of fifth generation dentin bonding agent incorporated with nisin on Streptococcus mutans Antioxidant pre-treatments are able to reduce waiting time for restorative treatment after dental bleaching: a microtensile bond strength exploratory study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1