Federica Jiritano, Raffaele Serra, Antonio Nenna, Antonio Curcillo, Francesco Villella, Francesco Nappi, Camilla Chello, Massimo Chello, Pasquale Mastroroberto, Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino
{"title":"心脏手术中开放隐静脉采血后预防性富血小板血浆(PRP)的疗效。","authors":"Federica Jiritano, Raffaele Serra, Antonio Nenna, Antonio Curcillo, Francesco Villella, Francesco Nappi, Camilla Chello, Massimo Chello, Pasquale Mastroroberto, Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino","doi":"10.31083/j.fbe1402012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wound infection represents a frequent trouble following open saphenous vein harvesting in cardiac surgery. Platelets' growth factors are crucial for the healing process. Prophylactic platelet rich plasma (PRP) application on leg wound might reduce the incidence of saphenous vein harvest site infections in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2009 and December 2020, 987 consecutive patients underwent CABG using saphenous vein as conduit graft and were retrospectively divided into two groups. All patients had standard surgical leg wound closure and wound care, but treatment group received adjunctive topical application of PRP (no-PRP and PRP group, respectively). The primary outcome was wound infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Saphenous vein harvest site infection rate was similar between PRP (3.5%) and No-PRP (5.2%) group, <i>p</i> = 0.215. The ASEPSIS score was lower for the PRP group (PRP: 3.6 ± 9.1 vs. No-PRP: 5.3 ± 11.2; <i>p</i> = 0.014). Performing a subgroup analysis, the diabetic patients (PRP-DM) group had a lower rate of infection than control group (No-PRP DM) (2.6% vs. 7.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.026). PRP-DM patients had an inferior ASEPSIS score (PRP-DM: 2.7 ± 8.3 vs. No PRP-DM: 7.5 ± 13.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Topical application of autologous PRP on saphenoug vein harvest site might reduce the rate of surgical site infection, with particular benefit among diabetic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73068,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","volume":"14 2","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of prophylactic platelet rich plasma (PRP) following open saphenous vein harvesting in cardiac surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Federica Jiritano, Raffaele Serra, Antonio Nenna, Antonio Curcillo, Francesco Villella, Francesco Nappi, Camilla Chello, Massimo Chello, Pasquale Mastroroberto, Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.fbe1402012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wound infection represents a frequent trouble following open saphenous vein harvesting in cardiac surgery. Platelets' growth factors are crucial for the healing process. Prophylactic platelet rich plasma (PRP) application on leg wound might reduce the incidence of saphenous vein harvest site infections in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2009 and December 2020, 987 consecutive patients underwent CABG using saphenous vein as conduit graft and were retrospectively divided into two groups. All patients had standard surgical leg wound closure and wound care, but treatment group received adjunctive topical application of PRP (no-PRP and PRP group, respectively). The primary outcome was wound infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Saphenous vein harvest site infection rate was similar between PRP (3.5%) and No-PRP (5.2%) group, <i>p</i> = 0.215. The ASEPSIS score was lower for the PRP group (PRP: 3.6 ± 9.1 vs. No-PRP: 5.3 ± 11.2; <i>p</i> = 0.014). Performing a subgroup analysis, the diabetic patients (PRP-DM) group had a lower rate of infection than control group (No-PRP DM) (2.6% vs. 7.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.026). PRP-DM patients had an inferior ASEPSIS score (PRP-DM: 2.7 ± 8.3 vs. No PRP-DM: 7.5 ± 13.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Topical application of autologous PRP on saphenoug vein harvest site might reduce the rate of surgical site infection, with particular benefit among diabetic patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbe1402012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbe1402012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
背景:伤口感染是心脏手术中开放隐静脉采集后的常见问题。血小板的生长因子对愈合过程至关重要。预防性富血小板血浆(PRP)应用于腿部创面可降低冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)患者隐静脉采收部位感染的发生率。方法:2009年1月至2020年12月,连续987例患者采用隐静脉作为导管移植行冠脉搭桥术,回顾性分为两组。所有患者均进行了标准的手术腿部伤口闭合和伤口护理,治疗组辅助局部应用PRP(分别为无PRP组和PRP组)。主要结局为伤口感染。结果:PRP组和No-PRP组的隐静脉采伐部位感染率无显著差异(p = 0.215),前者为3.5%,后者为5.2%。PRP组的ASEPSIS评分较低(PRP: 3.6±9.1 vs. No-PRP: 5.3±11.2;P = 0.014)。进行亚组分析,糖尿病患者(PRP-DM)组的感染率低于对照组(No-PRP DM) (2.6% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.026)。PRP-DM患者的ASEPSIS评分较低(PRP-DM: 2.7±8.3 vs.无PRP-DM: 7.5±13.2,p < 0.001)。结论:自体PRP局部应用于隐静脉采收部位可降低手术部位的感染率,尤其对糖尿病患者疗效显著。
Efficacy of prophylactic platelet rich plasma (PRP) following open saphenous vein harvesting in cardiac surgery.
Background: Wound infection represents a frequent trouble following open saphenous vein harvesting in cardiac surgery. Platelets' growth factors are crucial for the healing process. Prophylactic platelet rich plasma (PRP) application on leg wound might reduce the incidence of saphenous vein harvest site infections in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).
Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2020, 987 consecutive patients underwent CABG using saphenous vein as conduit graft and were retrospectively divided into two groups. All patients had standard surgical leg wound closure and wound care, but treatment group received adjunctive topical application of PRP (no-PRP and PRP group, respectively). The primary outcome was wound infection.
Results: Saphenous vein harvest site infection rate was similar between PRP (3.5%) and No-PRP (5.2%) group, p = 0.215. The ASEPSIS score was lower for the PRP group (PRP: 3.6 ± 9.1 vs. No-PRP: 5.3 ± 11.2; p = 0.014). Performing a subgroup analysis, the diabetic patients (PRP-DM) group had a lower rate of infection than control group (No-PRP DM) (2.6% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.026). PRP-DM patients had an inferior ASEPSIS score (PRP-DM: 2.7 ± 8.3 vs. No PRP-DM: 7.5 ± 13.2, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Topical application of autologous PRP on saphenoug vein harvest site might reduce the rate of surgical site infection, with particular benefit among diabetic patients.