人与小鼠停药心血管药物蛋白靶点的比较分析。

Yuqi Zhao, Jingwen Wang, Yanjie Wang, Jingfei Huang
{"title":"人与小鼠停药心血管药物蛋白靶点的比较分析。","authors":"Yuqi Zhao,&nbsp;Jingwen Wang,&nbsp;Yanjie Wang,&nbsp;Jingfei Huang","doi":"10.1186/2043-9113-2-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mouse is widely used in animal testing of cardiovascular disease. However, a large number of cardiovascular drugs that have been experimentally proved to work well on mouse were withdrawn because they caused adverse side effects in human.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we investigate whether binding patterns of withdrawn cardiovascular drugs are conserved between mouse and human through computational dockings and molecular dynamic simulations. In addition, we also measured the level of conservation of gene expression patterns of the drug targets and their interacting partners by analyzing the microarray data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show that target proteins of withdrawn cardiovascular drugs are functionally conserved between human and mouse. However, all the binding patterns of withdrawn drugs we retrieved show striking difference due to sequence divergence in drug-binding pocket, mainly through loss or gain of hydrogen bond donors and distinct drug-binding pockets. The binding affinities of withdrawn drugs to their receptors tend to be reduced from mouse to human. In contrast, the FDA-approved and best-selling drugs are little affected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis suggests that sequence divergence in drug-binding pocket may be a reasonable explanation for the discrepancy of drug effects between animal models and human.</p>","PeriodicalId":73663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical bioinformatics","volume":" ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2043-9113-2-10","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of protein targets of withdrawn cardiovascular drugs in human and mouse.\",\"authors\":\"Yuqi Zhao,&nbsp;Jingwen Wang,&nbsp;Yanjie Wang,&nbsp;Jingfei Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/2043-9113-2-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mouse is widely used in animal testing of cardiovascular disease. However, a large number of cardiovascular drugs that have been experimentally proved to work well on mouse were withdrawn because they caused adverse side effects in human.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we investigate whether binding patterns of withdrawn cardiovascular drugs are conserved between mouse and human through computational dockings and molecular dynamic simulations. In addition, we also measured the level of conservation of gene expression patterns of the drug targets and their interacting partners by analyzing the microarray data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show that target proteins of withdrawn cardiovascular drugs are functionally conserved between human and mouse. However, all the binding patterns of withdrawn drugs we retrieved show striking difference due to sequence divergence in drug-binding pocket, mainly through loss or gain of hydrogen bond donors and distinct drug-binding pockets. The binding affinities of withdrawn drugs to their receptors tend to be reduced from mouse to human. In contrast, the FDA-approved and best-selling drugs are little affected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis suggests that sequence divergence in drug-binding pocket may be a reasonable explanation for the discrepancy of drug effects between animal models and human.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2043-9113-2-10\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-2-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-2-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:小鼠被广泛用于心血管疾病的动物实验。然而,大量实验证明对小鼠有效的心血管药物由于对人体产生不良副作用而被撤下。方法:通过计算对接和分子动力学模拟,研究停药后心血管药物的结合模式在人鼠之间是否具有保守性。此外,我们还通过分析微阵列数据测量了药物靶点及其相互作用伙伴的基因表达模式的保护水平。结果:停用的心血管药物靶蛋白在人和小鼠之间具有功能保守性。然而,由于药物结合口袋的序列差异,我们检索到的所有退出药物的结合模式都表现出显著的差异,这主要是由于氢键供体的丢失或获得以及不同的药物结合口袋。从小鼠到人,停药后药物与其受体的结合亲和力趋于降低。相比之下,fda批准的畅销药物几乎没有受到影响。结论:我们的分析表明,药物结合口袋的序列差异可能是动物模型与人类模型之间药物作用差异的合理解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative analysis of protein targets of withdrawn cardiovascular drugs in human and mouse.

Background: Mouse is widely used in animal testing of cardiovascular disease. However, a large number of cardiovascular drugs that have been experimentally proved to work well on mouse were withdrawn because they caused adverse side effects in human.

Methods: In this study, we investigate whether binding patterns of withdrawn cardiovascular drugs are conserved between mouse and human through computational dockings and molecular dynamic simulations. In addition, we also measured the level of conservation of gene expression patterns of the drug targets and their interacting partners by analyzing the microarray data.

Results: The results show that target proteins of withdrawn cardiovascular drugs are functionally conserved between human and mouse. However, all the binding patterns of withdrawn drugs we retrieved show striking difference due to sequence divergence in drug-binding pocket, mainly through loss or gain of hydrogen bond donors and distinct drug-binding pockets. The binding affinities of withdrawn drugs to their receptors tend to be reduced from mouse to human. In contrast, the FDA-approved and best-selling drugs are little affected.

Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that sequence divergence in drug-binding pocket may be a reasonable explanation for the discrepancy of drug effects between animal models and human.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical research informatics (CRI): overview over new tools and services First Clinical Research Informatics (CRI) Solutions Day: advanced IT support from EU projects for clinical trials Mobile eHealth solution (ePRO) EHR4CR local workbench TRANSFoRm Data quality tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1