应用于耳机的主动噪声控制技术对噪声环境中首选听音水平的影响。

IF 1.1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Audiology and Otology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-24 DOI:10.7874/jao.2021.00612
Takunari Hoshina, Daiki Fujiyama, Takuji Koike, Katsuhisa Ikeda
{"title":"应用于耳机的主动噪声控制技术对噪声环境中首选听音水平的影响。","authors":"Takunari Hoshina,&nbsp;Daiki Fujiyama,&nbsp;Takuji Koike,&nbsp;Katsuhisa Ikeda","doi":"10.7874/jao.2021.00612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The harmful effects of frequent exposure to loud sounds through portable music players (PMPs) in combination with earphones have been suggested to result in a high prevalence of recreational noise-induced hearing loss among children, adolescents, and young adults. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of an active noise control technology applied to earphones on the preferred listening levels (PLLs) while listening to music in the presence of background noise.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Twenty-three adults between 20 and 40 years with normal hearing were recruited for this study. PLLs for listening to pop-rock and classical music were measured in the participants' ear canal with a commercially available PMP for four earphone/headphone configurations in quiet and noisy conditions. Ear canal insertion loss was measured in open ear conditions as well as earphone/headphone conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average PLL while using earphones and headphones exceeded 85 dBA corresponding to the sound level to induce hearing damage, but in the case of canal earphones with noise cancelling (NC), it was below 75 dBA, corresponding to potentially harmful levels. The background subway noise significantly increased the PLL measured in quiet conditions using any four earphone/headphone types except canal earphones with NC. Canal earphones with NC showed the lowest PLLs compared with participants' average PLLs using the other three earphone/headphone types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To minimize recreational noise exposure at the risk of PMP use, the use of earphones with NC is recommended in noisy environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":44886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/55/jao-2021-00612.PMC9271732.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of an Active Noise Control Technology Applied to Earphones on Preferred Listening Levels in Noisy Environments.\",\"authors\":\"Takunari Hoshina,&nbsp;Daiki Fujiyama,&nbsp;Takuji Koike,&nbsp;Katsuhisa Ikeda\",\"doi\":\"10.7874/jao.2021.00612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The harmful effects of frequent exposure to loud sounds through portable music players (PMPs) in combination with earphones have been suggested to result in a high prevalence of recreational noise-induced hearing loss among children, adolescents, and young adults. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of an active noise control technology applied to earphones on the preferred listening levels (PLLs) while listening to music in the presence of background noise.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Twenty-three adults between 20 and 40 years with normal hearing were recruited for this study. PLLs for listening to pop-rock and classical music were measured in the participants' ear canal with a commercially available PMP for four earphone/headphone configurations in quiet and noisy conditions. Ear canal insertion loss was measured in open ear conditions as well as earphone/headphone conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average PLL while using earphones and headphones exceeded 85 dBA corresponding to the sound level to induce hearing damage, but in the case of canal earphones with noise cancelling (NC), it was below 75 dBA, corresponding to potentially harmful levels. The background subway noise significantly increased the PLL measured in quiet conditions using any four earphone/headphone types except canal earphones with NC. Canal earphones with NC showed the lowest PLLs compared with participants' average PLLs using the other three earphone/headphone types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To minimize recreational noise exposure at the risk of PMP use, the use of earphones with NC is recommended in noisy environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Audiology and Otology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/55/jao-2021-00612.PMC9271732.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Audiology and Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2021.00612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2021.00612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目的:在儿童、青少年和年轻人中,经常通过便携式音乐播放器(pmp)和耳机接触大声声音的有害影响被认为会导致娱乐性噪音引起的听力损失的高发。本研究旨在评估一种应用于耳机的主动噪声控制技术对在有背景噪声的情况下听音乐时首选听音水平(pll)的影响。对象和方法:本研究招募了23名年龄在20至40岁之间听力正常的成年人。在安静和嘈杂的条件下,用市售的四种耳机/耳机配置的PMP在参与者的耳道中测量了听流行摇滚和古典音乐时的锁相环。耳道插入损失在开放耳条件下以及耳机/耳机条件下测量。结果:使用耳机和耳机时,平均PLL超过85 dBA,对应于引起听力损伤的声级,而使用带消噪(NC)的耳道式耳机时,平均PLL低于75 dBA,对应于潜在的有害声级。背景地铁噪声显著增加了在安静条件下使用任何四种耳机/耳机类型测量的锁相环,除了带NC的通道式耳机。与使用其他三种耳机/耳机类型的参与者相比,使用NC的Canal耳机显示出最低的pll。结论:为了减少PMP使用的娱乐性噪音暴露风险,建议在嘈杂环境中使用带NC的耳机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of an Active Noise Control Technology Applied to Earphones on Preferred Listening Levels in Noisy Environments.

Background and objectives: The harmful effects of frequent exposure to loud sounds through portable music players (PMPs) in combination with earphones have been suggested to result in a high prevalence of recreational noise-induced hearing loss among children, adolescents, and young adults. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of an active noise control technology applied to earphones on the preferred listening levels (PLLs) while listening to music in the presence of background noise.

Subjects and methods: Twenty-three adults between 20 and 40 years with normal hearing were recruited for this study. PLLs for listening to pop-rock and classical music were measured in the participants' ear canal with a commercially available PMP for four earphone/headphone configurations in quiet and noisy conditions. Ear canal insertion loss was measured in open ear conditions as well as earphone/headphone conditions.

Results: The average PLL while using earphones and headphones exceeded 85 dBA corresponding to the sound level to induce hearing damage, but in the case of canal earphones with noise cancelling (NC), it was below 75 dBA, corresponding to potentially harmful levels. The background subway noise significantly increased the PLL measured in quiet conditions using any four earphone/headphone types except canal earphones with NC. Canal earphones with NC showed the lowest PLLs compared with participants' average PLLs using the other three earphone/headphone types.

Conclusions: To minimize recreational noise exposure at the risk of PMP use, the use of earphones with NC is recommended in noisy environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Audiology and Otology
Journal of Audiology and Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Audiology and Otology (JAO) (formerly known as Korean Journal of Audiology) aims to publish the most advanced findings for all aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear using state-of-the-art techniques and analyses. The journal covers recent trends related to the topics of audiology, otology, and neurotology conducted by professionals, with the goal of providing better possible treatment to people of all ages, from infants to the elderly, who suffer from auditory and/or vestibular disorders and thus, improving their quality of life. This journal encourages the submission of review papers about current professional issues, research papers presenting a scientific base and clinical application, and case papers with unique reports or clinical trials. We also invite letters to the editor and papers related to the manufacture and distribution of medical devices. This journal provides integrated views from otologists, audiologists, and other healthcare practitioners, offering readers high quality scientific and clinical information. This peer-reviewed and open access journal has been the official journal of the Korean Audiological Society since 1997 and of both the Korean Audiological Society and the Korean Otological Society since 2017. It is published in English four times a year in January, April, July, and October.
期刊最新文献
Does Cognitive Function Affect Performance and Listening Effort During Bilateral Wireless Streaming in Hearing Aid Users? Hearing Screening for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review. How to Help Deaf Children Who Do Not Understand Their Vestibular Symptoms and Motor Disorders as Abnormal? Test-Retest Reliability of Tone Burst-Induced 500 Hz Air-Conduction Masseter Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential in Healthy Individuals. The Relationship Between Lower Vitamin D Levels and Hearing Loss in Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1