Pratheeba Natrajan, Ravindra Rahuveera Bhat, R Remadevi, Idhuyya Raajesh Joseph, S Vijayalakshmi, T Deepak Paulose
{"title":"超声引导下囊包膜神经群阻滞与髂筋膜腔室阻滞对脊柱麻醉下髋部骨折术后镇痛效果的比较研究。","authors":"Pratheeba Natrajan, Ravindra Rahuveera Bhat, R Remadevi, Idhuyya Raajesh Joseph, S Vijayalakshmi, T Deepak Paulose","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_122_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fractures in and around the hip are a major concern in young as well as the elderly. Ultrasound-guided (USG) peripheral nerve blocks help in early surgical fixation of these fractures by providing perioperative pain relief as well as early mobilization resulting in reduced morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to compare the efficacy of USG pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus fascia iliaca compartment (FIC) block.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-four patients above 18 years of age with hip fracture belonging to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status Classes I and II scheduled for hip surgery were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1(PENG block) received USG-guided PENG block and Group 2 (FIC block) received USG guided FIC block for postoperative pain relief. Postoperative pain relief (at rest) was evaluated by Numeric Rating Scale score from 20<sup>th</sup> min and at regular interval for 24 h. The total analgesic consumption in the first 24 h was also noted.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Data were analyzed by using nonparametric test and Chi-square test. Hemodynamic variables and pain scores were analyzed using analysis of variance for two groups and independent <i>t</i>-test was used for comparison between two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative NRS score was higher in FIC block than PENG block which was statistically significant at 1 h (<i>P</i> = 0.035) and at 4 h (<i>P</i> = 0.001). The first requirement of analgesic was significantly late in PENG block group (8.17 ± 3.129) as compared to FIC block group (4.00 ± 1.477).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PENG block provides better postoperative analgesia, with reduced requirement of rescue analgesics in 24 h as compared to FIC block in patients undergoing surgeries for hip fracture under spinal anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"15 3","pages":"285-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936861/pdf/","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block on the Postoperative Analgesic Effect in Patients Undergoing Surgeries for Hip Fracture under Spinal Anesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"Pratheeba Natrajan, Ravindra Rahuveera Bhat, R Remadevi, Idhuyya Raajesh Joseph, S Vijayalakshmi, T Deepak Paulose\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aer.aer_122_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fractures in and around the hip are a major concern in young as well as the elderly. Ultrasound-guided (USG) peripheral nerve blocks help in early surgical fixation of these fractures by providing perioperative pain relief as well as early mobilization resulting in reduced morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to compare the efficacy of USG pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus fascia iliaca compartment (FIC) block.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-four patients above 18 years of age with hip fracture belonging to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status Classes I and II scheduled for hip surgery were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1(PENG block) received USG-guided PENG block and Group 2 (FIC block) received USG guided FIC block for postoperative pain relief. Postoperative pain relief (at rest) was evaluated by Numeric Rating Scale score from 20<sup>th</sup> min and at regular interval for 24 h. The total analgesic consumption in the first 24 h was also noted.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Data were analyzed by using nonparametric test and Chi-square test. Hemodynamic variables and pain scores were analyzed using analysis of variance for two groups and independent <i>t</i>-test was used for comparison between two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative NRS score was higher in FIC block than PENG block which was statistically significant at 1 h (<i>P</i> = 0.035) and at 4 h (<i>P</i> = 0.001). The first requirement of analgesic was significantly late in PENG block group (8.17 ± 3.129) as compared to FIC block group (4.00 ± 1.477).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PENG block provides better postoperative analgesia, with reduced requirement of rescue analgesics in 24 h as compared to FIC block in patients undergoing surgeries for hip fracture under spinal anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"285-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936861/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_122_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_122_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
背景:髋部及其周围骨折是年轻人和老年人的主要关注点。超声引导(USG)周围神经阻滞有助于这些骨折的早期手术固定,提供围手术期疼痛缓解以及早期活动,从而降低发病率和死亡率。目的:本研究旨在比较USG包膜神经组(PENG)阻滞与髂筋膜间室(FIC)阻滞的疗效。环境与设计:前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照研究。材料与方法:选取24例年龄在18岁以上、属于美国麻醉医师学会物理状态I类和II类、拟行髋关节手术的髋部骨折患者,随机分为两组。组1(PENG block)采用USG引导下的PENG block,组2 (FIC block)采用USG引导下的FIC block来缓解术后疼痛。术后(静息时)疼痛缓解从20分钟开始以数值评定量表评分,并定期间隔24小时进行评估。同时记录前24小时的总镇痛消耗。采用统计分析:采用非参数检验和卡方检验对数据进行分析。两组血流动力学变量和疼痛评分采用方差分析,两组间比较采用独立t检验。结果:术后NRS评分在1 h (P = 0.035)和4 h (P = 0.001)时高于PENG组(P = 0.035)。与FIC阻断组(4.00±1.477)相比,PENG阻断组(8.17±3.129)镇痛药的首次需要量明显晚于FIC阻断组(4.00±1.477)。结论:脊柱麻醉下髋部骨折手术患者,与FIC阻滞相比,PENG阻滞提供了更好的术后镇痛效果,24 h内对抢救镇痛药物的需求减少。
Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block on the Postoperative Analgesic Effect in Patients Undergoing Surgeries for Hip Fracture under Spinal Anesthesia.
Background: Fractures in and around the hip are a major concern in young as well as the elderly. Ultrasound-guided (USG) peripheral nerve blocks help in early surgical fixation of these fractures by providing perioperative pain relief as well as early mobilization resulting in reduced morbidity and mortality.
Aims: This study aims to compare the efficacy of USG pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus fascia iliaca compartment (FIC) block.
Setting and design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study.
Materials and methods: Twenty-four patients above 18 years of age with hip fracture belonging to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status Classes I and II scheduled for hip surgery were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1(PENG block) received USG-guided PENG block and Group 2 (FIC block) received USG guided FIC block for postoperative pain relief. Postoperative pain relief (at rest) was evaluated by Numeric Rating Scale score from 20th min and at regular interval for 24 h. The total analgesic consumption in the first 24 h was also noted.
Statistical analysis used: Data were analyzed by using nonparametric test and Chi-square test. Hemodynamic variables and pain scores were analyzed using analysis of variance for two groups and independent t-test was used for comparison between two groups.
Results: Postoperative NRS score was higher in FIC block than PENG block which was statistically significant at 1 h (P = 0.035) and at 4 h (P = 0.001). The first requirement of analgesic was significantly late in PENG block group (8.17 ± 3.129) as compared to FIC block group (4.00 ± 1.477).
Conclusions: PENG block provides better postoperative analgesia, with reduced requirement of rescue analgesics in 24 h as compared to FIC block in patients undergoing surgeries for hip fracture under spinal anesthesia.