主观耳鸣的测量:视觉模拟量表代表什么?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1736649
Seung-Ho Shin, Sung Wan Byun, Soo Jin Kim, Ho Yun Lee
{"title":"主观耳鸣的测量:视觉模拟量表代表什么?","authors":"Seung-Ho Shin,&nbsp;Sung Wan Byun,&nbsp;Soo Jin Kim,&nbsp;Ho Yun Lee","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1736649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with tinnitus may have different severity levels of tinnitus distress. Visual analog scale (VAS) is a simple method to measure the extent of subjective distress caused by tinnitus. It includes ratings of tinnitus loudness, awareness, annoyance, and impact of tinnitus on life.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate what led to different distress levels in patients with bilateral tinnitus by analyzing the relationships among all subscales of VAS scores for tinnitus distress and the documented variables.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This study was a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>The medical records of 268 patients who visited a tinnitus clinic between March and December 2020 were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Epidemiologic characteristics, subjective tinnitus distress factors including tinnitus loudness, awareness, annoyance, and impact of tinnitus on life, questionnaire results including those from the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and audiometric profiles were documented. Based on a bivariate analysis between variables and subtypes of subjective tinnitus distress, stepwise logistic regression was performed to identify potential influencing factors for aggravating each subtype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from a total of 122 patients with bilateral tinnitus were collected. The cohort included 77 males and 45 females with a mean age of 51.16 ± 13.50 years. Tinnitus loudness was associated with an accompanying headache (<i>p</i> < 0.001), the BDI score (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and the duration of tinnitus (<i>p</i> = 0.006). A high THI (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and an accompanying headache (<i>p</i> = 0.016) were both associated with tinnitus annoyance. Hearing thresholds at 250 Hz (<i>p</i> = 0.011) and 500 Hz (<i>p</i> = 0.002) on the left side were associated with an impact of tinnitus on life. The hearing threshold at 4 kHz on the left side alone was associated with tinnitus awareness (<i>p</i> = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychologic complaints are mainly associated with tinnitus loudness and annoyance. On the other hand, hearing loss is linked with tinnitus awareness and its impact on life. Thus, an individualized, sequential approach that considers different subtypes of tinnitus severity to assess subjective tinnitus distress is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measures of Subjective Tinnitus: What Does Visual Analog Scale Stand for?\",\"authors\":\"Seung-Ho Shin,&nbsp;Sung Wan Byun,&nbsp;Soo Jin Kim,&nbsp;Ho Yun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1736649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with tinnitus may have different severity levels of tinnitus distress. Visual analog scale (VAS) is a simple method to measure the extent of subjective distress caused by tinnitus. It includes ratings of tinnitus loudness, awareness, annoyance, and impact of tinnitus on life.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate what led to different distress levels in patients with bilateral tinnitus by analyzing the relationships among all subscales of VAS scores for tinnitus distress and the documented variables.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This study was a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>The medical records of 268 patients who visited a tinnitus clinic between March and December 2020 were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Epidemiologic characteristics, subjective tinnitus distress factors including tinnitus loudness, awareness, annoyance, and impact of tinnitus on life, questionnaire results including those from the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and audiometric profiles were documented. Based on a bivariate analysis between variables and subtypes of subjective tinnitus distress, stepwise logistic regression was performed to identify potential influencing factors for aggravating each subtype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from a total of 122 patients with bilateral tinnitus were collected. The cohort included 77 males and 45 females with a mean age of 51.16 ± 13.50 years. Tinnitus loudness was associated with an accompanying headache (<i>p</i> < 0.001), the BDI score (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and the duration of tinnitus (<i>p</i> = 0.006). A high THI (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and an accompanying headache (<i>p</i> = 0.016) were both associated with tinnitus annoyance. Hearing thresholds at 250 Hz (<i>p</i> = 0.011) and 500 Hz (<i>p</i> = 0.002) on the left side were associated with an impact of tinnitus on life. The hearing threshold at 4 kHz on the left side alone was associated with tinnitus awareness (<i>p</i> = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychologic complaints are mainly associated with tinnitus loudness and annoyance. On the other hand, hearing loss is linked with tinnitus awareness and its impact on life. Thus, an individualized, sequential approach that considers different subtypes of tinnitus severity to assess subjective tinnitus distress is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736649\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736649","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:耳鸣患者可能有不同程度的耳鸣痛苦。视觉模拟量表(VAS)是衡量耳鸣主观痛苦程度的一种简便方法。它包括耳鸣响度,意识,烦恼和耳鸣对生活的影响的评级。目的:本研究的目的是通过分析耳鸣痛苦VAS评分各亚量表与文献变量之间的关系,评估导致双侧耳鸣患者不同痛苦程度的原因。研究设计:本研究为回顾性队列研究。研究样本:回顾了2020年3月至12月期间就诊耳鸣诊所的268名患者的医疗记录。资料收集与分析:记录流行病学特征、主观耳鸣困扰因素(包括耳鸣响度、耳鸣意识、耳鸣烦恼、耳鸣对生活的影响)、耳鸣障碍量表(THI)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)问卷调查结果以及听力学特征。基于变量和主观耳鸣痛苦亚型之间的双变量分析,采用逐步逻辑回归来确定加重每种亚型的潜在影响因素。结果:共收集了122例双侧耳鸣患者的资料。男性77例,女性45例,平均年龄51.16±13.50岁。耳鸣响度与头痛相关(p = 0.001),耳鸣持续时间相关(p = 0.006)。高THI (p p = 0.016)均与耳鸣烦恼相关。左侧250 Hz (p = 0.011)和500 Hz (p = 0.002)的听力阈值与耳鸣对生活的影响有关。左侧单独4 kHz的听力阈值与耳鸣意识相关(p = 0.013)。结论:心理主诉主要与耳鸣、响度、烦恼有关。另一方面,听力损失与耳鸣意识及其对生活的影响有关。因此,需要一种个性化的、顺序的方法,考虑不同亚型的耳鸣严重程度来评估主观耳鸣痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measures of Subjective Tinnitus: What Does Visual Analog Scale Stand for?

Background: Patients with tinnitus may have different severity levels of tinnitus distress. Visual analog scale (VAS) is a simple method to measure the extent of subjective distress caused by tinnitus. It includes ratings of tinnitus loudness, awareness, annoyance, and impact of tinnitus on life.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate what led to different distress levels in patients with bilateral tinnitus by analyzing the relationships among all subscales of VAS scores for tinnitus distress and the documented variables.

Research design: This study was a retrospective cohort study.

Study sample: The medical records of 268 patients who visited a tinnitus clinic between March and December 2020 were reviewed.

Data collection and analysis: Epidemiologic characteristics, subjective tinnitus distress factors including tinnitus loudness, awareness, annoyance, and impact of tinnitus on life, questionnaire results including those from the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and audiometric profiles were documented. Based on a bivariate analysis between variables and subtypes of subjective tinnitus distress, stepwise logistic regression was performed to identify potential influencing factors for aggravating each subtype.

Results: Data from a total of 122 patients with bilateral tinnitus were collected. The cohort included 77 males and 45 females with a mean age of 51.16 ± 13.50 years. Tinnitus loudness was associated with an accompanying headache (p < 0.001), the BDI score (p = 0.001), and the duration of tinnitus (p = 0.006). A high THI (p < 0.001) and an accompanying headache (p = 0.016) were both associated with tinnitus annoyance. Hearing thresholds at 250 Hz (p = 0.011) and 500 Hz (p = 0.002) on the left side were associated with an impact of tinnitus on life. The hearing threshold at 4 kHz on the left side alone was associated with tinnitus awareness (p = 0.013).

Conclusion: Psychologic complaints are mainly associated with tinnitus loudness and annoyance. On the other hand, hearing loss is linked with tinnitus awareness and its impact on life. Thus, an individualized, sequential approach that considers different subtypes of tinnitus severity to assess subjective tinnitus distress is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Location of Focal Traumatic Brain Injury and Canal Involved in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo. The Effect of COVID-19 on the Efferent Auditory System in Adults. Increased Perception of Head Tilt to Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Correlates to Motion Sickness Susceptibility in Vestibular Migraine. A Comparison of Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials via Audiometric and Nonaudiometric Bone Vibrators. Comparison of Multifrequency Narrow-Band CE-Chirp and Tone Burst Evoked Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1