比较创建腹腔积气的两种进入方法及其美容效果:前瞻性观察研究

Pub Date : 2022-09-02 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1756182
Srikantaiah Chandra Sekhariah Hiremath, Zameer Ahmed
{"title":"比较创建腹腔积气的两种进入方法及其美容效果:前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Srikantaiah Chandra Sekhariah Hiremath, Zameer Ahmed","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1756182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  The main challenge in laparoscopic surgery is creating pneumoperitoneum using various surgical techniques. Every procedure has its own advocates. The aim of this study was to determine the cosmetic outcomes of the two of the major surgical techniques (open-Hasson technique versus closed-Veress technique) used in laparoscopic surgery. <b>Methods</b>  This was a prospective, observational, comparative study conducted from October 2017 to September 2018 in 132 patients, who presented to our center and fulfilled our selection criteria. For all the patients, pneumoperitoneum was performed using either open (Hasson) or closed technique (Veress). A database was created for all the patients and the technique dependent cosmetic outcomes were assessed and reported. <b>Results</b>  There were a total of 66 patients in each group (open and closed). The mean age of the open group was 51.56±11.42 years and closed group was 54.36±14.78 years, respectively. The major comorbidities found in both the groups were diabetes mellitus (6/66, group A; 7/66, group B) and hypertension (3/66, group A; 4/66, group B). In open group, umbilical (58/66, <i>p</i> =0.001) and in closed group infraumbilical (35/66, <i>p</i> =0.001) were the most commonly used incisions. <b>Conclusion</b>  As benefits outweigh the risks, the better cosmetic outcomes were observed in patients underwent closed technique over open technique ( <i>p</i> <0.05).</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9439881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Entry Methods and Their Cosmetic Outcomes in Creating Pneumoperitoneum: A Prospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Srikantaiah Chandra Sekhariah Hiremath, Zameer Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1756182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>  The main challenge in laparoscopic surgery is creating pneumoperitoneum using various surgical techniques. Every procedure has its own advocates. The aim of this study was to determine the cosmetic outcomes of the two of the major surgical techniques (open-Hasson technique versus closed-Veress technique) used in laparoscopic surgery. <b>Methods</b>  This was a prospective, observational, comparative study conducted from October 2017 to September 2018 in 132 patients, who presented to our center and fulfilled our selection criteria. For all the patients, pneumoperitoneum was performed using either open (Hasson) or closed technique (Veress). A database was created for all the patients and the technique dependent cosmetic outcomes were assessed and reported. <b>Results</b>  There were a total of 66 patients in each group (open and closed). The mean age of the open group was 51.56±11.42 years and closed group was 54.36±14.78 years, respectively. The major comorbidities found in both the groups were diabetes mellitus (6/66, group A; 7/66, group B) and hypertension (3/66, group A; 4/66, group B). In open group, umbilical (58/66, <i>p</i> =0.001) and in closed group infraumbilical (35/66, <i>p</i> =0.001) were the most commonly used incisions. <b>Conclusion</b>  As benefits outweigh the risks, the better cosmetic outcomes were observed in patients underwent closed technique over open technique ( <i>p</i> <0.05).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9439881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 腹腔镜手术的主要挑战是利用各种外科技术创造腹腔积气。每种手术方法都有自己的主张。本研究旨在确定腹腔镜手术中使用的两种主要手术技术(开放式哈森技术与闭合式维雷斯技术)的美容效果。方法 这是一项前瞻性、观察性、比较研究,于 2017 年 10 月至 2018 年 9 月在本中心就诊的 132 名患者中进行,这些患者均符合我们的选择标准。所有患者均采用开放式(Hasson)或闭合式技术(Veress)进行腹腔积气。我们为所有患者建立了数据库,并评估和报告了与技术相关的美容效果。结果 每组(开腹和闭腹)共有 66 名患者。开刀组的平均年龄为(51.56±11.42)岁,闭刀组的平均年龄为(54.36±14.78)岁。两组患者的主要合并症均为糖尿病(6/66,A 组;7/66,B 组)和高血压(3/66,A 组;4/66,B 组)。开腹组最常用的切口是脐部切口(58/66,P =0.001),闭腹组最常用的切口是脐下切口(35/66,P =0.001)。结论 由于利大于弊,接受闭合式技术的患者比接受开放式技术的患者获得了更好的美容效果(P = 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Comparison of Two Entry Methods and Their Cosmetic Outcomes in Creating Pneumoperitoneum: A Prospective Observational Study.

Background  The main challenge in laparoscopic surgery is creating pneumoperitoneum using various surgical techniques. Every procedure has its own advocates. The aim of this study was to determine the cosmetic outcomes of the two of the major surgical techniques (open-Hasson technique versus closed-Veress technique) used in laparoscopic surgery. Methods  This was a prospective, observational, comparative study conducted from October 2017 to September 2018 in 132 patients, who presented to our center and fulfilled our selection criteria. For all the patients, pneumoperitoneum was performed using either open (Hasson) or closed technique (Veress). A database was created for all the patients and the technique dependent cosmetic outcomes were assessed and reported. Results  There were a total of 66 patients in each group (open and closed). The mean age of the open group was 51.56±11.42 years and closed group was 54.36±14.78 years, respectively. The major comorbidities found in both the groups were diabetes mellitus (6/66, group A; 7/66, group B) and hypertension (3/66, group A; 4/66, group B). In open group, umbilical (58/66, p =0.001) and in closed group infraumbilical (35/66, p =0.001) were the most commonly used incisions. Conclusion  As benefits outweigh the risks, the better cosmetic outcomes were observed in patients underwent closed technique over open technique ( p <0.05).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1