T细胞免疫是流行病最后阶段的关键:如何测量和监测它

Q4 Immunology and Microbiology Current research in immunology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.crimmu.2022.08.004
Megan Schwarz , Slim Mzoughi , Daniel Lozano-Ojalvo , Anthony T. Tan , Antonio Bertoletti , Ernesto Guccione
{"title":"T细胞免疫是流行病最后阶段的关键:如何测量和监测它","authors":"Megan Schwarz ,&nbsp;Slim Mzoughi ,&nbsp;Daniel Lozano-Ojalvo ,&nbsp;Anthony T. Tan ,&nbsp;Antonio Bertoletti ,&nbsp;Ernesto Guccione","doi":"10.1016/j.crimmu.2022.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As vaccine deployment improves the healthcare emergency status caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, we need reliable tools to evaluate the duration of protective immunity at a global scale. Seminal studies have demonstrated that while neutralizing antibodies can protect us from viral infection, T cell-mediated cellular immunity provides long-term protection from severe COVID-19, even in the case of emerging new variants of concern (VOC). Indeed, the emergence of VOCs, able to substantially escape antibodies generated by current vaccines, has made the analysis of correlates of humoral protection against infection obsolete. The focus should now shift towards immunological correlates of protection from disease based on quantification of cellular immunity.</p><p>Despite this evidence, an assessment of T cell responses is still overlooked. This is largely due to technical challenges and lack of validated diagnostic tests. Here, we review the current state of the art of available tests to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific Tcells and non-antigen specific T-cells. These assays range from the analysis of the T cell-receptor (TCR) diversity (i.e. Immunoseq and MHC tetramer staining) to the detection of functional T cell activation (i.e. ICS, AIM, Elispot, ELLA, dqTACT, etc.) either from purified Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) or whole blood.</p><p>We discuss advantages and disadvantages of each assay, proposing their ideal use for different scopes. Finally, we argue how it is paramount to deploy cheap, standardized, and scalable assays to measure T cell functionality to fill this critical diagnostic gap and manage these next years of the pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72750,"journal":{"name":"Current research in immunology","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 215-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/f2/main.PMC9434079.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"T cell immunity is key to the pandemic endgame: How to measure and monitor it\",\"authors\":\"Megan Schwarz ,&nbsp;Slim Mzoughi ,&nbsp;Daniel Lozano-Ojalvo ,&nbsp;Anthony T. Tan ,&nbsp;Antonio Bertoletti ,&nbsp;Ernesto Guccione\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crimmu.2022.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As vaccine deployment improves the healthcare emergency status caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, we need reliable tools to evaluate the duration of protective immunity at a global scale. Seminal studies have demonstrated that while neutralizing antibodies can protect us from viral infection, T cell-mediated cellular immunity provides long-term protection from severe COVID-19, even in the case of emerging new variants of concern (VOC). Indeed, the emergence of VOCs, able to substantially escape antibodies generated by current vaccines, has made the analysis of correlates of humoral protection against infection obsolete. The focus should now shift towards immunological correlates of protection from disease based on quantification of cellular immunity.</p><p>Despite this evidence, an assessment of T cell responses is still overlooked. This is largely due to technical challenges and lack of validated diagnostic tests. Here, we review the current state of the art of available tests to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific Tcells and non-antigen specific T-cells. These assays range from the analysis of the T cell-receptor (TCR) diversity (i.e. Immunoseq and MHC tetramer staining) to the detection of functional T cell activation (i.e. ICS, AIM, Elispot, ELLA, dqTACT, etc.) either from purified Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) or whole blood.</p><p>We discuss advantages and disadvantages of each assay, proposing their ideal use for different scopes. Finally, we argue how it is paramount to deploy cheap, standardized, and scalable assays to measure T cell functionality to fill this critical diagnostic gap and manage these next years of the pandemic.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current research in immunology\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 215-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/f2/main.PMC9434079.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current research in immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590255522000154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Immunology and Microbiology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590255522000154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

随着疫苗部署改善了SARS-CoV-2大流行造成的医疗紧急状况,我们需要可靠的工具来评估全球范围内保护性免疫的持续时间。开创性的研究表明,虽然中和抗体可以保护我们免受病毒感染,但T细胞介导的细胞免疫可以长期保护我们免受严重的COVID-19感染,即使在出现新的关注变体(VOC)的情况下也是如此。事实上,挥发性有机化合物的出现能够大大逃避当前疫苗产生的抗体,这使得对体液预防感染的相关分析已经过时。现在的重点应转向基于细胞免疫定量的疾病保护的免疫学相关性。尽管有这些证据,对T细胞反应的评估仍然被忽视。这主要是由于技术挑战和缺乏有效的诊断测试。在这里,我们回顾了区分SARS-CoV-2抗原特异性t细胞和非抗原特异性t细胞的现有检测技术的现状。这些检测的范围从T细胞受体(TCR)多样性的分析(即免疫序列和MHC四聚体染色)到功能性T细胞活化的检测(即ICS, AIM, Elispot, ELLA, dqTACT等),无论是纯化的外周血单核细胞(PBMCs)还是全血。我们讨论了每种测定法的优点和缺点,提出了它们在不同范围内的理想用途。最后,我们认为,部署廉价、标准化和可扩展的检测方法来测量T细胞功能,以填补这一关键的诊断空白,并管理未来几年的大流行,是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
T cell immunity is key to the pandemic endgame: How to measure and monitor it

As vaccine deployment improves the healthcare emergency status caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, we need reliable tools to evaluate the duration of protective immunity at a global scale. Seminal studies have demonstrated that while neutralizing antibodies can protect us from viral infection, T cell-mediated cellular immunity provides long-term protection from severe COVID-19, even in the case of emerging new variants of concern (VOC). Indeed, the emergence of VOCs, able to substantially escape antibodies generated by current vaccines, has made the analysis of correlates of humoral protection against infection obsolete. The focus should now shift towards immunological correlates of protection from disease based on quantification of cellular immunity.

Despite this evidence, an assessment of T cell responses is still overlooked. This is largely due to technical challenges and lack of validated diagnostic tests. Here, we review the current state of the art of available tests to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific Tcells and non-antigen specific T-cells. These assays range from the analysis of the T cell-receptor (TCR) diversity (i.e. Immunoseq and MHC tetramer staining) to the detection of functional T cell activation (i.e. ICS, AIM, Elispot, ELLA, dqTACT, etc.) either from purified Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) or whole blood.

We discuss advantages and disadvantages of each assay, proposing their ideal use for different scopes. Finally, we argue how it is paramount to deploy cheap, standardized, and scalable assays to measure T cell functionality to fill this critical diagnostic gap and manage these next years of the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
42 days
期刊最新文献
Mitochondrial electron transport chain in macrophage reprogramming: Potential role in antibacterial immune response Parasitic infections: A new frontier for PGD2 functions Lymphoblastoid cell lines do not recapitulate physiological circulating B cell subtypes Cytokine levels in gingival tissues as an indicator to understand periodontal disease severity Inhibition of NK cell cytotoxicity by tubular epithelial cell expression of Clr-b and Clr-f
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1