早期教育干预与后期教育质量的互补性?对持续环境假说的系统回顾

IF 5.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Developmental Review Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dr.2020.100910
Drew H. Bailey , Jade M. Jenkins, Daniela Alvarez-Vargas
{"title":"早期教育干预与后期教育质量的互补性?对持续环境假说的系统回顾","authors":"Drew H. Bailey ,&nbsp;Jade M. Jenkins,&nbsp;Daniela Alvarez-Vargas","doi":"10.1016/j.dr.2020.100910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The sustaining environments hypothesis refers to the popular idea, stemming from theories in developmental, cognitive, and educational psychology, that the long-term success of early educational interventions is contingent on the quality of the subsequent learning environment. Several studies have investigated whether specific kindergarten classroom and other elementary school factors account for patterns of persistence and fadeout of early educational interventions. These analyses focus on the statistical interaction between an early educational intervention – usually whether the child attended preschool – and several measures of the quality of the subsequent educational environment. The key prediction of the sustaining environments hypothesis is a positive interaction between these two variables. To quantify the strength of the evidence for such effects, we meta-analyze existing studies that have attempted to estimate interactions between preschool and later educational quality in the United States. We then attempt to establish the consistency of the direction and a plausible range of estimates of the interaction between preschool attendance and subsequent educational quality by using a specification curve analysis in a large, nationally representative dataset that has been used in several recent studies of the sustaining environments hypothesis. The meta-analysis yields small positive interaction estimates ranging from approximately 0.00 to 0.04, depending on the specification. The specification curve analyses yield interaction estimates of approximately 0. Results suggest that the current mix of methods used to test the sustaining environments hypothesis cannot reliably detect realistically sized effects. Our recommendations are to combine large sample sizes with strong causal identification strategies, and to study combinations of interventions that have a strong probability of showing large main effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48214,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Review","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 100910"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100910","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complementarities between early educational intervention and later educational quality? A systematic review of the sustaining environments hypothesis\",\"authors\":\"Drew H. Bailey ,&nbsp;Jade M. Jenkins,&nbsp;Daniela Alvarez-Vargas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dr.2020.100910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The sustaining environments hypothesis refers to the popular idea, stemming from theories in developmental, cognitive, and educational psychology, that the long-term success of early educational interventions is contingent on the quality of the subsequent learning environment. Several studies have investigated whether specific kindergarten classroom and other elementary school factors account for patterns of persistence and fadeout of early educational interventions. These analyses focus on the statistical interaction between an early educational intervention – usually whether the child attended preschool – and several measures of the quality of the subsequent educational environment. The key prediction of the sustaining environments hypothesis is a positive interaction between these two variables. To quantify the strength of the evidence for such effects, we meta-analyze existing studies that have attempted to estimate interactions between preschool and later educational quality in the United States. We then attempt to establish the consistency of the direction and a plausible range of estimates of the interaction between preschool attendance and subsequent educational quality by using a specification curve analysis in a large, nationally representative dataset that has been used in several recent studies of the sustaining environments hypothesis. The meta-analysis yields small positive interaction estimates ranging from approximately 0.00 to 0.04, depending on the specification. The specification curve analyses yield interaction estimates of approximately 0. Results suggest that the current mix of methods used to test the sustaining environments hypothesis cannot reliably detect realistically sized effects. Our recommendations are to combine large sample sizes with strong causal identification strategies, and to study combinations of interventions that have a strong probability of showing large main effects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Review\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100910\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229720300162\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229720300162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

持续环境假说是一种流行的观点,源于发展心理学、认知心理学和教育心理学的理论,即早期教育干预的长期成功取决于随后的学习环境的质量。一些研究调查了特定的幼儿园教室和其他小学因素是否解释了早期教育干预的持续和消退模式。这些分析集中在早期教育干预(通常是孩子是否上过学前班)和后续教育环境质量的几个衡量标准之间的统计相互作用。可持续环境假说的关键预测是这两个变量之间的积极相互作用。为了量化这种影响的证据强度,我们对现有的研究进行了荟萃分析,这些研究试图估计美国学前教育和后期教育质量之间的相互作用。然后,我们试图建立方向的一致性和学前教育出勤与随后的教育质量之间相互作用的合理估计范围,方法是在一个大型的、具有全国代表性的数据集中使用规范曲线分析,该数据集已在最近的几项可持续环境假设研究中使用。元分析产生小的正相互作用估计,范围从大约0.00到0.04,取决于规格。规格曲线分析产生的相互作用估计约为0。结果表明,目前用于测试持续环境假设的混合方法不能可靠地检测实际大小的影响。我们的建议是将大样本量与强有力的因果识别策略结合起来,并研究有很大可能显示出大主效应的干预措施组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Complementarities between early educational intervention and later educational quality? A systematic review of the sustaining environments hypothesis

The sustaining environments hypothesis refers to the popular idea, stemming from theories in developmental, cognitive, and educational psychology, that the long-term success of early educational interventions is contingent on the quality of the subsequent learning environment. Several studies have investigated whether specific kindergarten classroom and other elementary school factors account for patterns of persistence and fadeout of early educational interventions. These analyses focus on the statistical interaction between an early educational intervention – usually whether the child attended preschool – and several measures of the quality of the subsequent educational environment. The key prediction of the sustaining environments hypothesis is a positive interaction between these two variables. To quantify the strength of the evidence for such effects, we meta-analyze existing studies that have attempted to estimate interactions between preschool and later educational quality in the United States. We then attempt to establish the consistency of the direction and a plausible range of estimates of the interaction between preschool attendance and subsequent educational quality by using a specification curve analysis in a large, nationally representative dataset that has been used in several recent studies of the sustaining environments hypothesis. The meta-analysis yields small positive interaction estimates ranging from approximately 0.00 to 0.04, depending on the specification. The specification curve analyses yield interaction estimates of approximately 0. Results suggest that the current mix of methods used to test the sustaining environments hypothesis cannot reliably detect realistically sized effects. Our recommendations are to combine large sample sizes with strong causal identification strategies, and to study combinations of interventions that have a strong probability of showing large main effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental Review
Developmental Review PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Presenting research that bears on important conceptual issues in developmental psychology, Developmental Review: Perspectives in Behavior and Cognition provides child and developmental, child clinical, and educational psychologists with authoritative articles that reflect current thinking and cover significant scientific developments. The journal emphasizes human developmental processes and gives particular attention to issues relevant to child developmental psychology. The research concerns issues with important implications for the fields of pediatrics, psychiatry, and education, and increases the understanding of socialization processes.
期刊最新文献
Executive function: Debunking an overprized construct Learning to live in the spatial world: Experience-expectant and experience-dependent input Executive functions and social cognition from early childhood to pre-adolescence: A systematic review Judith Rich Harris and child development: 25 years after The Nurture Assumption Chronicle of deceit: Navigating the developmental cognitive landscape from childhood fabrications to prolific adulthood artistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1