血压控制措施和心血管结局:一项前瞻性高血压队列研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Blood Pressure Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1080/08037051.2022.2118662
Konstantinos Sideris, Ioannis Andrikou, Costas Thomopoulos, Fotis Tatakis, Maria Kariori, Eleni Manta, Theodoros Kalos, Stergios Soulaidopoulos, Sotirios Drogkaris, Dimitris Konstantinidis, Konstantinos Tsioufis
{"title":"血压控制措施和心血管结局:一项前瞻性高血压队列研究。","authors":"Konstantinos Sideris,&nbsp;Ioannis Andrikou,&nbsp;Costas Thomopoulos,&nbsp;Fotis Tatakis,&nbsp;Maria Kariori,&nbsp;Eleni Manta,&nbsp;Theodoros Kalos,&nbsp;Stergios Soulaidopoulos,&nbsp;Sotirios Drogkaris,&nbsp;Dimitris Konstantinidis,&nbsp;Konstantinos Tsioufis","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2022.2118662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We investigated whether blood pressure (BP) control measures, visit-to-visit BP variability, and time in therapeutic range (TTR) are associated with future cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Among 1,408 hypertensive patients without cardiovascular disease, we prospectively evaluated the incident major cardiovascular events over 6 years. In newly diagnosed patients, antihypertensive drug treatment was initiated. We estimated two markers of on-treatment BP control, (1) visit-to-visit BPV as the coefficient of variation of office systolic BP (BP-CV), and (2) TTR calculated as the percentage of office systolic BP measurements within 120-140mmHg across visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hypertensive cohort (672 males, mean age 60 years, 31% newly diagnosed) had a mean systolic/diastolic BP of 142/87 mmHg. The mean number of visits was 4.9 ± 2.6, while the mean attained systolic/diastolic BP during follow-up was 137/79 mmHg using 2.7 ± 1.1 antihypertensive drugs. The BP-CV and TTR were 9.1 ± 4.1% and 45 ± 29%, respectively, and the incidence of the composite outcome was 8.3% (<i>n</i> = 117). After adjustment for relevant confounders and standardization to z-scores, BP-CV and TTR were associated with a 43% (95% CI, 27-62%) increase and a 33% (95% CI, 15-47%) reduction in the outcome. However, the joint evaluation of TTR and BP-CV in a common multivariable model indicated that a standardized change of TTR was associated with the outcome to a greater extent than BP-CV (mean hazard ratios of 30% vs. 24%, respectively). When combined with the higher BP standardized-CV quartile, the lower TTR quartile predicted the outcome by 2.3 times (95% CI, 1.1-5.4) compared to the inverse TTR and BP-CV quartile pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High BP-CV or low TTR was associated with future cardiovascular events in a cohort of treated hypertensive patients. As a determinant, the extent of TTR value appears greater than BP-CV when these measures are considered in the same multivariable model.</p>","PeriodicalId":9000,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood pressure control measures and cardiovascular outcomes: a prospective hypertensive cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Sideris,&nbsp;Ioannis Andrikou,&nbsp;Costas Thomopoulos,&nbsp;Fotis Tatakis,&nbsp;Maria Kariori,&nbsp;Eleni Manta,&nbsp;Theodoros Kalos,&nbsp;Stergios Soulaidopoulos,&nbsp;Sotirios Drogkaris,&nbsp;Dimitris Konstantinidis,&nbsp;Konstantinos Tsioufis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08037051.2022.2118662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We investigated whether blood pressure (BP) control measures, visit-to-visit BP variability, and time in therapeutic range (TTR) are associated with future cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Among 1,408 hypertensive patients without cardiovascular disease, we prospectively evaluated the incident major cardiovascular events over 6 years. In newly diagnosed patients, antihypertensive drug treatment was initiated. We estimated two markers of on-treatment BP control, (1) visit-to-visit BPV as the coefficient of variation of office systolic BP (BP-CV), and (2) TTR calculated as the percentage of office systolic BP measurements within 120-140mmHg across visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hypertensive cohort (672 males, mean age 60 years, 31% newly diagnosed) had a mean systolic/diastolic BP of 142/87 mmHg. The mean number of visits was 4.9 ± 2.6, while the mean attained systolic/diastolic BP during follow-up was 137/79 mmHg using 2.7 ± 1.1 antihypertensive drugs. The BP-CV and TTR were 9.1 ± 4.1% and 45 ± 29%, respectively, and the incidence of the composite outcome was 8.3% (<i>n</i> = 117). After adjustment for relevant confounders and standardization to z-scores, BP-CV and TTR were associated with a 43% (95% CI, 27-62%) increase and a 33% (95% CI, 15-47%) reduction in the outcome. However, the joint evaluation of TTR and BP-CV in a common multivariable model indicated that a standardized change of TTR was associated with the outcome to a greater extent than BP-CV (mean hazard ratios of 30% vs. 24%, respectively). When combined with the higher BP standardized-CV quartile, the lower TTR quartile predicted the outcome by 2.3 times (95% CI, 1.1-5.4) compared to the inverse TTR and BP-CV quartile pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High BP-CV or low TTR was associated with future cardiovascular events in a cohort of treated hypertensive patients. As a determinant, the extent of TTR value appears greater than BP-CV when these measures are considered in the same multivariable model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Pressure\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Pressure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2022.2118662\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2022.2118662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:我们研究血压(BP)控制措施、每次来访时的血压变异性和治疗范围内时间(TTR)是否与高血压患者未来的心血管结局相关。材料与方法:对1408例无心血管疾病的高血压患者6年内主要心血管事件的发生率进行前瞻性评价。在新诊断的患者中,开始抗高血压药物治疗。我们估计了治疗期间血压控制的两个标志,(1)就诊至就诊BPV作为办公室收缩压(BP- cv)的变异系数,(2)TTR计算为每次就诊期间120-140mmHg办公室收缩压测量值的百分比。结果:高血压队列(672名男性,平均年龄60岁,31%新诊断)的平均收缩压/舒张压为142/87 mmHg。平均就诊次数为4.9±2.6次,平均收缩压/舒张压为137/79 mmHg,使用2.7±1.1种降压药。BP-CV和TTR分别为9.1±4.1%和45±29%,综合结局发生率为8.3% (n = 117)。在校正相关混杂因素和标准化z分数后,BP-CV和TTR与结果增加43% (95% CI, 27-62%)和减少33% (95% CI, 15-47%)相关。然而,在一个常见的多变量模型中,TTR和BP-CV的联合评估表明,TTR的标准化变化与结果的关联程度大于BP-CV(平均风险比分别为30%和24%)。当与高BP标准化cv四分位数相结合时,较低TTR四分位数预测结果的概率是TTR和BP- cv四分位数相反模式的2.3倍(95% CI, 1.1-5.4)。结论:在接受治疗的高血压患者队列中,高BP-CV或低TTR与未来心血管事件相关。作为一个决定因素,当在同一多变量模型中考虑这些措施时,TTR值的程度似乎大于BP-CV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blood pressure control measures and cardiovascular outcomes: a prospective hypertensive cohort.

Purpose: We investigated whether blood pressure (BP) control measures, visit-to-visit BP variability, and time in therapeutic range (TTR) are associated with future cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients.

Materials and methods: Among 1,408 hypertensive patients without cardiovascular disease, we prospectively evaluated the incident major cardiovascular events over 6 years. In newly diagnosed patients, antihypertensive drug treatment was initiated. We estimated two markers of on-treatment BP control, (1) visit-to-visit BPV as the coefficient of variation of office systolic BP (BP-CV), and (2) TTR calculated as the percentage of office systolic BP measurements within 120-140mmHg across visits.

Results: The hypertensive cohort (672 males, mean age 60 years, 31% newly diagnosed) had a mean systolic/diastolic BP of 142/87 mmHg. The mean number of visits was 4.9 ± 2.6, while the mean attained systolic/diastolic BP during follow-up was 137/79 mmHg using 2.7 ± 1.1 antihypertensive drugs. The BP-CV and TTR were 9.1 ± 4.1% and 45 ± 29%, respectively, and the incidence of the composite outcome was 8.3% (n = 117). After adjustment for relevant confounders and standardization to z-scores, BP-CV and TTR were associated with a 43% (95% CI, 27-62%) increase and a 33% (95% CI, 15-47%) reduction in the outcome. However, the joint evaluation of TTR and BP-CV in a common multivariable model indicated that a standardized change of TTR was associated with the outcome to a greater extent than BP-CV (mean hazard ratios of 30% vs. 24%, respectively). When combined with the higher BP standardized-CV quartile, the lower TTR quartile predicted the outcome by 2.3 times (95% CI, 1.1-5.4) compared to the inverse TTR and BP-CV quartile pattern.

Conclusion: High BP-CV or low TTR was associated with future cardiovascular events in a cohort of treated hypertensive patients. As a determinant, the extent of TTR value appears greater than BP-CV when these measures are considered in the same multivariable model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: For outstanding coverage of the latest advances in hypertension research, turn to Blood Pressure, a primary source for authoritative and timely information on all aspects of hypertension research and management. Features include: • Physiology and pathophysiology of blood pressure regulation • Primary and secondary hypertension • Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications of hypertension • Detection, treatment and follow-up of hypertension • Non pharmacological and pharmacological management • Large outcome trials in hypertension.
期刊最新文献
Mission 70/26 Project: improving blood pressure control in Portugal. Factors associated with progression of arterial stiffness in ischemic stroke survivors: the Norwegian Stroke in the Young Study. The impact of prediabetes and diabetes on endothelial function in a large population-based cohort. The relationship between mid-upper arm circumference and blood pressure in Walter Sisulu University community. Habitual food consumption, eating behavior and meal-timing among Jordanian adults with elevated Blood pressure: a cross-sectional population-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1