脓毒症犬麻醉过程中吸入或全静脉麻醉相关术前液体治疗方案的比较

Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-08 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm001222
Vírgínia Conceição Tavares Lima, Anna Julia Rodrigues Peixoto, Maria Eduarda Dos Santos Lopes Fernandes, Lucinéia Costa Oliveira, Ana Carolina de Souza Campos, Ágatha Ferreira Xavier de Oliveira, Naiara Vidal Stocco, Cristiane Divan Baldani, Felipe Farias Pereira da Câmara Barros, Cássia Maria Molinaro Coelho
{"title":"脓毒症犬麻醉过程中吸入或全静脉麻醉相关术前液体治疗方案的比较","authors":"Vírgínia Conceição Tavares Lima,&nbsp;Anna Julia Rodrigues Peixoto,&nbsp;Maria Eduarda Dos Santos Lopes Fernandes,&nbsp;Lucinéia Costa Oliveira,&nbsp;Ana Carolina de Souza Campos,&nbsp;Ágatha Ferreira Xavier de Oliveira,&nbsp;Naiara Vidal Stocco,&nbsp;Cristiane Divan Baldani,&nbsp;Felipe Farias Pereira da Câmara Barros,&nbsp;Cássia Maria Molinaro Coelho","doi":"10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm001222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate different fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia in the cardiorespiratory stability of bitches with sepsis subjected to a surgical procedure to control the infectious focus. Thirty-two bitches diagnosed with pyometra and sepsis and treated at the University Veterinary Hospital between 2018 and 2019 were recruited. After admission, diagnosis, clinical, and laboratory evaluation, patients were randomly distributed into the following groups: propofol 5 (P[5]: preoperative restrictive fluid therapy-5mL/kg/h and intravenous general anesthesia); propofol 10 (P[10]: preoperative liberal fluid therapy-10mL/kg/h and intravenous general anesthesia); and isoflurane 5 (I[5]: preoperative restrictive fluid therapy-5mL/kg/h and inhalational general anesthesia). Lactate on admission (LAC1) and release (LAC2), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), rectal temperature (RT), oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>), and carbon dioxide extraction rate (EtCO<sub>2</sub>) were analyzed at PRE, T10, T20, T30, T40, T50, TEXT, and TDIS. Clearance of 20% of lactate occurred in 18 dogs, with the P[10] group displaying the best performance. There was no statistical difference in vasopressor requirements among the groups. Liberal fluid therapy showed greater cardiovascular stability than restrictive therapy in the perioperative period. Regarding general anesthesia, isoflurane showed greater cardiorespiratory stability than propofol during anesthetic maintenance. In conclusion, although the three proposed protocols are safe and there is no difference in their superiority, some observed changes may be relevant and considered when it is possible to individualize the therapy for the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":72458,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e001222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f9/f8/bjvm-44-e001222.PMC9477224.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of preoperative fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia for anesthetic procedures in dogs with sepsis.\",\"authors\":\"Vírgínia Conceição Tavares Lima,&nbsp;Anna Julia Rodrigues Peixoto,&nbsp;Maria Eduarda Dos Santos Lopes Fernandes,&nbsp;Lucinéia Costa Oliveira,&nbsp;Ana Carolina de Souza Campos,&nbsp;Ágatha Ferreira Xavier de Oliveira,&nbsp;Naiara Vidal Stocco,&nbsp;Cristiane Divan Baldani,&nbsp;Felipe Farias Pereira da Câmara Barros,&nbsp;Cássia Maria Molinaro Coelho\",\"doi\":\"10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm001222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate different fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia in the cardiorespiratory stability of bitches with sepsis subjected to a surgical procedure to control the infectious focus. Thirty-two bitches diagnosed with pyometra and sepsis and treated at the University Veterinary Hospital between 2018 and 2019 were recruited. After admission, diagnosis, clinical, and laboratory evaluation, patients were randomly distributed into the following groups: propofol 5 (P[5]: preoperative restrictive fluid therapy-5mL/kg/h and intravenous general anesthesia); propofol 10 (P[10]: preoperative liberal fluid therapy-10mL/kg/h and intravenous general anesthesia); and isoflurane 5 (I[5]: preoperative restrictive fluid therapy-5mL/kg/h and inhalational general anesthesia). Lactate on admission (LAC1) and release (LAC2), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), rectal temperature (RT), oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>), and carbon dioxide extraction rate (EtCO<sub>2</sub>) were analyzed at PRE, T10, T20, T30, T40, T50, TEXT, and TDIS. Clearance of 20% of lactate occurred in 18 dogs, with the P[10] group displaying the best performance. There was no statistical difference in vasopressor requirements among the groups. Liberal fluid therapy showed greater cardiovascular stability than restrictive therapy in the perioperative period. Regarding general anesthesia, isoflurane showed greater cardiorespiratory stability than propofol during anesthetic maintenance. In conclusion, although the three proposed protocols are safe and there is no difference in their superiority, some observed changes may be relevant and considered when it is possible to individualize the therapy for the patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e001222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f9/f8/bjvm-44-e001222.PMC9477224.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm001222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm001222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本随机临床试验旨在评估不同液体治疗方案与吸入或全静脉麻醉相关,对脓毒症母狗接受手术控制感染病灶的心肺稳定性的影响。2018年至2019年期间,在大学兽医医院接受治疗的32只母狗被诊断患有脓膜炎和败血症。经入院、诊断、临床及实验室评估后,将患者随机分为以下组:异丙酚5组(P[5]:术前限制性液体治疗- 5ml /kg/h,静脉全麻);异丙酚10 (P[10]:术前自由输液- 10ml /kg/h,静脉全麻);异氟醚5 (I[5]:术前限制性液体治疗- 5ml /kg/h,吸入全麻)。在PRE、T10、T20、T30、T40、T50、TEXT和TDIS分析入院时乳酸(LAC1)和乳酸释放(LAC2)、心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)、收缩压(SBP)、直肠温度(RT)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)和二氧化碳萃取率(EtCO2)。18只狗的乳酸清除率达到20%,其中P[10]组表现最佳。两组间血管加压素需要量无统计学差异。围手术期自由液体治疗比限制性治疗表现出更好的心血管稳定性。关于全身麻醉,异氟醚在麻醉维持期间比异丙酚表现出更好的心肺稳定性。综上所述,尽管这三种方案都是安全的,并且它们的优越性没有差异,但当可能对患者进行个体化治疗时,一些观察到的变化可能是相关的,并应加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of preoperative fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia for anesthetic procedures in dogs with sepsis.

This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate different fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia in the cardiorespiratory stability of bitches with sepsis subjected to a surgical procedure to control the infectious focus. Thirty-two bitches diagnosed with pyometra and sepsis and treated at the University Veterinary Hospital between 2018 and 2019 were recruited. After admission, diagnosis, clinical, and laboratory evaluation, patients were randomly distributed into the following groups: propofol 5 (P[5]: preoperative restrictive fluid therapy-5mL/kg/h and intravenous general anesthesia); propofol 10 (P[10]: preoperative liberal fluid therapy-10mL/kg/h and intravenous general anesthesia); and isoflurane 5 (I[5]: preoperative restrictive fluid therapy-5mL/kg/h and inhalational general anesthesia). Lactate on admission (LAC1) and release (LAC2), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), rectal temperature (RT), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and carbon dioxide extraction rate (EtCO2) were analyzed at PRE, T10, T20, T30, T40, T50, TEXT, and TDIS. Clearance of 20% of lactate occurred in 18 dogs, with the P[10] group displaying the best performance. There was no statistical difference in vasopressor requirements among the groups. Liberal fluid therapy showed greater cardiovascular stability than restrictive therapy in the perioperative period. Regarding general anesthesia, isoflurane showed greater cardiorespiratory stability than propofol during anesthetic maintenance. In conclusion, although the three proposed protocols are safe and there is no difference in their superiority, some observed changes may be relevant and considered when it is possible to individualize the therapy for the patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clostridium perfringens alpha toxin enteritis associated with pulmonary disease in a neotropical otter (Lontra longicaudis, Olfers, 1818) under human care. Seroprevalence and factors associated with exposure to Neospora caninum among dairy cattle smallholders in southern Rio Grande do Sul. Diagnosis of Giardia spp. in ruminants at Southern Brazil. Use of the transposition u-shaped palatal flap and polypropylene mesh to correct oronasal communication after resection of maxillary osteosarcoma in a dog. Urinary incontinence and sabulous cystitis in mares: report of five cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1