肿瘤消退等级是否足以预测食管癌三模式治疗的生存率?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Investigative Surgery Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-27 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2022.2127036
Yi-Min Gu, Si-Mian Lyu, Qi-Xin Shang, Han-Lu Zhang, Yu-Shang Yang, Wen-Ping Wang, Yong Yuan, Long-Qi Chen
{"title":"肿瘤消退等级是否足以预测食管癌三模式治疗的生存率?","authors":"Yi-Min Gu,&nbsp;Si-Mian Lyu,&nbsp;Qi-Xin Shang,&nbsp;Han-Lu Zhang,&nbsp;Yu-Shang Yang,&nbsp;Wen-Ping Wang,&nbsp;Yong Yuan,&nbsp;Long-Qi Chen","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2022.2127036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess the predictive value of tumor regression grade (TRG) and nodal status on survival in esophageal carcinoma with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tumor pathologic regression and nodal status were assessed. Differences in survival stratified by TRG or nodal status were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The prognostic value of TRG and nodal status were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From July 2016 to June 2019, 253 patients with esophageal cancer underwent nCRT followed by surgery. Significant differences were presented in survival according to nodal status but not TRG. Multivariate analysis showed that nodal status and not TRG was the only independent predicter for overall survival (HR: 3.550, 95% CI: 2.264-5.566, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and disease-free survival (HR: 2.801, 95% CI: 1.874-4.187, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The modified TRG system combining tumor regression with nodal status stratified patients survival with good discrimination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lymph node status impacts more importantly than TRG on survival for patients with esophageal cancer undergoing nCRT plus esophagectomy. The modified TRG system may facilitate postoperative treatment decisions and survival surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Tumor Regression Grade Sufficient to Predict Survival in Esophageal Cancer with Trimodal Therapy?\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Min Gu,&nbsp;Si-Mian Lyu,&nbsp;Qi-Xin Shang,&nbsp;Han-Lu Zhang,&nbsp;Yu-Shang Yang,&nbsp;Wen-Ping Wang,&nbsp;Yong Yuan,&nbsp;Long-Qi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08941939.2022.2127036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess the predictive value of tumor regression grade (TRG) and nodal status on survival in esophageal carcinoma with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tumor pathologic regression and nodal status were assessed. Differences in survival stratified by TRG or nodal status were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The prognostic value of TRG and nodal status were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From July 2016 to June 2019, 253 patients with esophageal cancer underwent nCRT followed by surgery. Significant differences were presented in survival according to nodal status but not TRG. Multivariate analysis showed that nodal status and not TRG was the only independent predicter for overall survival (HR: 3.550, 95% CI: 2.264-5.566, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and disease-free survival (HR: 2.801, 95% CI: 1.874-4.187, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The modified TRG system combining tumor regression with nodal status stratified patients survival with good discrimination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lymph node status impacts more importantly than TRG on survival for patients with esophageal cancer undergoing nCRT plus esophagectomy. The modified TRG system may facilitate postoperative treatment decisions and survival surveillance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2022.2127036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2022.2127036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估肿瘤消退等级(TRG)和淋巴结状态对食管癌新辅助放化疗(nCRT)患者生存的预测价值。方法:观察肿瘤病理消退及淋巴结状态。采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验分析按TRG或淋巴结状态分层的生存差异。采用单因素和多因素Cox比例风险法分析TRG和淋巴结状态的预后价值。结果:2016年7月至2019年6月,253例食管癌患者接受了nCRT后手术治疗。不同淋巴结状态的生存率有显著差异,但TRG无显著差异。多因素分析显示,淋巴结状态而非TRG是总生存的唯一独立预测因素(HR: 3.550, 95% CI: 2.264-5.566, P P)。结论:淋巴结状态比TRG对食管癌行nCRT +食管切除术患者生存的影响更重要。改良后的TRG系统有助于术后治疗决策和生存监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is Tumor Regression Grade Sufficient to Predict Survival in Esophageal Cancer with Trimodal Therapy?

Background: This study aimed to assess the predictive value of tumor regression grade (TRG) and nodal status on survival in esophageal carcinoma with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

Methods: Tumor pathologic regression and nodal status were assessed. Differences in survival stratified by TRG or nodal status were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The prognostic value of TRG and nodal status were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards methods.

Results: From July 2016 to June 2019, 253 patients with esophageal cancer underwent nCRT followed by surgery. Significant differences were presented in survival according to nodal status but not TRG. Multivariate analysis showed that nodal status and not TRG was the only independent predicter for overall survival (HR: 3.550, 95% CI: 2.264-5.566, P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (HR: 2.801, 95% CI: 1.874-4.187, P < 0.001). The modified TRG system combining tumor regression with nodal status stratified patients survival with good discrimination.

Conclusions: Lymph node status impacts more importantly than TRG on survival for patients with esophageal cancer undergoing nCRT plus esophagectomy. The modified TRG system may facilitate postoperative treatment decisions and survival surveillance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
期刊最新文献
Anterior, Posterior and Anterior-Posterior Approaches for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. The HIF-1α/PKM2 Feedback Loop in Relation to EGFR Mutational Status in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Posttranscriptional Regulation of Intestinal Mucosal Growth and Adaptation by Noncoding RNAs in Critical Surgical Disorders. Statement of Retraction: Liver X Receptors Activation Attenuates Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of Liver Graft in Rats. Correlation Between Basal Metabolic Rate and Clinical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1