蛋白质和微小RNA生物标志物的系列测量,以确定心肌梗死亚型。

Christian Schulte , Bhawana Singh , Konstantinos Theofilatos , Nils A. Sörensen , Jonas Lehmacher , Tau Hartikainen , Paul M. Haller , Dirk Westermann , Tanja Zeller , Stefan Blankenberg , Johannes T. Neumann , Manuel Mayr
{"title":"蛋白质和微小RNA生物标志物的系列测量,以确定心肌梗死亚型。","authors":"Christian Schulte ,&nbsp;Bhawana Singh ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Theofilatos ,&nbsp;Nils A. Sörensen ,&nbsp;Jonas Lehmacher ,&nbsp;Tau Hartikainen ,&nbsp;Paul M. Haller ,&nbsp;Dirk Westermann ,&nbsp;Tanja Zeller ,&nbsp;Stefan Blankenberg ,&nbsp;Johannes T. Neumann ,&nbsp;Manuel Mayr","doi":"10.1016/j.jmccpl.2022.100014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>While cardiac-specific troponin (cTn) allows for rapid diagnosis of acute type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI), its performance to differentiate acute myocardial injury (AI) or type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) is limited. The objective was to combine biomarkers to improve discrimination of different myocardial infarction (MI) aetiologies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We determined levels of cardiac troponin T and I (cTnT, cTnI), cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C), NT-proBNP and ten miRNAs, known to be associated with cardiac pathology in a total of <em>n</em> = 495 serial plasma samples at three time points (on admission, after 1 h and 3 h) from 57 NSTEMI (non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction), 18 AI, and 31 STEMI patients, as defined by fourth universal definition of MI (UDMI4) and 59 control individuals. We then applied linear mixed effects model to compare the kinetics of all molecules in these MI sub-types.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Established (cTnT, cTnI) and novel (cMyBP-C) cardiac necrosis markers failed in differentiating T1MI vs T2MI at early time points. All cardiac necrosis markers were higher in T1MI than in T2MI at 3 h after admission. Muscle-enriched miRNAs (miR-1 and miR-133a) were correlated with cardiac necrosis protein markers and did not offer better discrimination. Established cardiac strain marker NT-proBNP differentiated AI and T1MI at all time points but failed to discriminate T2MI from T1MI. However, the combination of NT-proBNP and cTnT along with age returned an overall AUC of 0.76 [95 % CI 0.67–0.84] for differentiating T1MI, T2MI and AI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Rather than using single biomarkers of myocardial necrosis, a combination of clinical biomarkers for cardiac necrosis (troponin) and cardiac strain (NT-proBNP) might aid in differentiating T1MI, T2MI and AI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73835,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/8c/main.PMC9514835.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serial measurements of protein and microRNA biomarkers to specify myocardial infarction subtypes\",\"authors\":\"Christian Schulte ,&nbsp;Bhawana Singh ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Theofilatos ,&nbsp;Nils A. Sörensen ,&nbsp;Jonas Lehmacher ,&nbsp;Tau Hartikainen ,&nbsp;Paul M. Haller ,&nbsp;Dirk Westermann ,&nbsp;Tanja Zeller ,&nbsp;Stefan Blankenberg ,&nbsp;Johannes T. Neumann ,&nbsp;Manuel Mayr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmccpl.2022.100014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>While cardiac-specific troponin (cTn) allows for rapid diagnosis of acute type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI), its performance to differentiate acute myocardial injury (AI) or type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) is limited. The objective was to combine biomarkers to improve discrimination of different myocardial infarction (MI) aetiologies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We determined levels of cardiac troponin T and I (cTnT, cTnI), cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C), NT-proBNP and ten miRNAs, known to be associated with cardiac pathology in a total of <em>n</em> = 495 serial plasma samples at three time points (on admission, after 1 h and 3 h) from 57 NSTEMI (non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction), 18 AI, and 31 STEMI patients, as defined by fourth universal definition of MI (UDMI4) and 59 control individuals. We then applied linear mixed effects model to compare the kinetics of all molecules in these MI sub-types.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Established (cTnT, cTnI) and novel (cMyBP-C) cardiac necrosis markers failed in differentiating T1MI vs T2MI at early time points. All cardiac necrosis markers were higher in T1MI than in T2MI at 3 h after admission. Muscle-enriched miRNAs (miR-1 and miR-133a) were correlated with cardiac necrosis protein markers and did not offer better discrimination. Established cardiac strain marker NT-proBNP differentiated AI and T1MI at all time points but failed to discriminate T2MI from T1MI. However, the combination of NT-proBNP and cTnT along with age returned an overall AUC of 0.76 [95 % CI 0.67–0.84] for differentiating T1MI, T2MI and AI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Rather than using single biomarkers of myocardial necrosis, a combination of clinical biomarkers for cardiac necrosis (troponin) and cardiac strain (NT-proBNP) might aid in differentiating T1MI, T2MI and AI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/8c/main.PMC9514835.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772976122000083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772976122000083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:虽然心肌特异性肌钙蛋白(cTn)可以快速诊断急性1型心肌梗死(T1MI),但其区分急性心肌损伤(AI)或2型心肌梗死的能力有限。目的是结合生物标志物来提高对不同心肌梗死(MI)病因的鉴别。方法:我们测定了57例非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)、18例AI和31例STEMI患者在三个时间点(入院时、1小时和3小时后)总共n=495份系列血浆样本中的肌钙蛋白T和I(cTnT、cTnI)、心肌肌球蛋白结合蛋白C(cMyBP-C)、NT-proBNP和10种已知与心脏病理相关的miRNA的水平,如MI的第四个通用定义(UDMI4)和59个对照个体所定义。然后,我们应用线性混合效应模型来比较这些MI亚型中所有分子的动力学。结果:已建立的(cTnT,cTnI)和新的(cMyBP-C)心脏坏死标志物在早期时间点未能区分T1MI和T2MI。入院后3小时,T1MI的所有心脏坏死标志物均高于T2MI。富含肌肉的miRNA(miR-1和miR-133a)与心脏坏死蛋白标记物相关,并且没有提供更好的区分。已建立的心脏应变标记物NT-proBNP在所有时间点区分AI和T1MI,但未能区分T2MI和T1MI。然而,NT-proBNP和cTnT的组合随着年龄的增长,用于区分T1MI、T2MI和AI的总AUC为0.76[95%CI 0.67-0.84]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Serial measurements of protein and microRNA biomarkers to specify myocardial infarction subtypes

Background

While cardiac-specific troponin (cTn) allows for rapid diagnosis of acute type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI), its performance to differentiate acute myocardial injury (AI) or type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) is limited. The objective was to combine biomarkers to improve discrimination of different myocardial infarction (MI) aetiologies.

Methods

We determined levels of cardiac troponin T and I (cTnT, cTnI), cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C), NT-proBNP and ten miRNAs, known to be associated with cardiac pathology in a total of n = 495 serial plasma samples at three time points (on admission, after 1 h and 3 h) from 57 NSTEMI (non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction), 18 AI, and 31 STEMI patients, as defined by fourth universal definition of MI (UDMI4) and 59 control individuals. We then applied linear mixed effects model to compare the kinetics of all molecules in these MI sub-types.

Results

Established (cTnT, cTnI) and novel (cMyBP-C) cardiac necrosis markers failed in differentiating T1MI vs T2MI at early time points. All cardiac necrosis markers were higher in T1MI than in T2MI at 3 h after admission. Muscle-enriched miRNAs (miR-1 and miR-133a) were correlated with cardiac necrosis protein markers and did not offer better discrimination. Established cardiac strain marker NT-proBNP differentiated AI and T1MI at all time points but failed to discriminate T2MI from T1MI. However, the combination of NT-proBNP and cTnT along with age returned an overall AUC of 0.76 [95 % CI 0.67–0.84] for differentiating T1MI, T2MI and AI.

Conclusions

Rather than using single biomarkers of myocardial necrosis, a combination of clinical biomarkers for cardiac necrosis (troponin) and cardiac strain (NT-proBNP) might aid in differentiating T1MI, T2MI and AI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus
Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
31 days
期刊最新文献
Transcriptome analysis of the aortic coarctation area Conditional ablation of MCU exacerbated cardiac pathology in a genetic arrhythmic model of CPVT P-, E-, and H-cadherins differ in their relationships with coronary stenosis, cardiovascular outcomes, and unplanned recurrent revascularization Sex differences in cardiac mitochondrial respiration and reactive oxygen species production may predispose Scn1a−/+ mice to cardiac arrhythmias and Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy Cardiac overexpression of a mitochondrial SUR2A splice variant impairs cardiac function and worsens myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury in female mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1