推进医疗设备周围的患者安全:唯一设备标识符在卫生系统实施中的障碍、策略和下一步。

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2022-06-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S364539
Natalia A Wilson, James E Tcheng, Jove Graham, Joseph P Drozda
{"title":"推进医疗设备周围的患者安全:唯一设备标识符在卫生系统实施中的障碍、策略和下一步。","authors":"Natalia A Wilson,&nbsp;James E Tcheng,&nbsp;Jove Graham,&nbsp;Joseph P Drozda","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S364539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The requirement for medical device manufacturers to label their devices with a unique device identifier (UDI) was formalized by the 2013 US Food and Drug Administration Unique Device Identification System Rule. However, parallel regulatory requirement for US health systems to use UDIs, particularly the electronic documentation of UDIs during patient care is lacking. Despite the lack of regulation, some health systems have implemented and are using UDIs. To assess the current state, we studied representative health system UDI implementation experiences, including barriers and the strategies to overcome them, and identified next steps to advance UDI adoption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were performed with health system personnel involved in UDI implementation in their cardiac catheterization labs or operating rooms. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the framework methodology of Ritchie and Spencer. An expert panel evaluated findings and informed barriers, strategies, and next steps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four interviews at ten health systems were performed. Identified barriers were internal (lack of organizational support, information technology gaps, clinical resistance) and external (information technology vendor resistance, limitations in manufacturer support, gaps in reference data, lack of an overall UDI system). Identified strategies included relationship building, education, engagement, and communication. Next steps to advance UDI adoption focus on education, research, support, and policy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Delineation of UDI implementation barriers and strategies provides guidance and support for health systems to adopt the UDI standard and electronically document UDIs during clinical care. Next steps illuminate critical areas for attention to advance UDI adoption and achieve a comprehensive UDI system in health care to strengthen patient care and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":" ","pages":"177-186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f8/14/mder-15-177.PMC9233486.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing Patient Safety Surrounding Medical Devices: Barriers, Strategies, and Next Steps in Health System Implementation of Unique Device Identifiers.\",\"authors\":\"Natalia A Wilson,&nbsp;James E Tcheng,&nbsp;Jove Graham,&nbsp;Joseph P Drozda\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/MDER.S364539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The requirement for medical device manufacturers to label their devices with a unique device identifier (UDI) was formalized by the 2013 US Food and Drug Administration Unique Device Identification System Rule. However, parallel regulatory requirement for US health systems to use UDIs, particularly the electronic documentation of UDIs during patient care is lacking. Despite the lack of regulation, some health systems have implemented and are using UDIs. To assess the current state, we studied representative health system UDI implementation experiences, including barriers and the strategies to overcome them, and identified next steps to advance UDI adoption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were performed with health system personnel involved in UDI implementation in their cardiac catheterization labs or operating rooms. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the framework methodology of Ritchie and Spencer. An expert panel evaluated findings and informed barriers, strategies, and next steps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four interviews at ten health systems were performed. Identified barriers were internal (lack of organizational support, information technology gaps, clinical resistance) and external (information technology vendor resistance, limitations in manufacturer support, gaps in reference data, lack of an overall UDI system). Identified strategies included relationship building, education, engagement, and communication. Next steps to advance UDI adoption focus on education, research, support, and policy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Delineation of UDI implementation barriers and strategies provides guidance and support for health systems to adopt the UDI standard and electronically document UDIs during clinical care. Next steps illuminate critical areas for attention to advance UDI adoption and achieve a comprehensive UDI system in health care to strengthen patient care and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"177-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f8/14/mder-15-177.PMC9233486.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S364539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S364539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:2013年美国食品和药物管理局唯一设备标识系统规则正式规定了医疗器械制造商使用唯一设备标识符(UDI)标记其设备的要求。然而,美国卫生系统使用UDIs的平行监管要求,特别是在患者护理期间UDIs的电子文档缺乏。尽管缺乏监管,但一些卫生系统已经实施并正在使用udi。为了评估现状,我们研究了具有代表性的卫生系统UDI实施经验,包括障碍和克服这些障碍的策略,并确定了推进UDI采用的下一步措施。方法:对在心导管实验室或手术室参与UDI实施的卫生系统人员进行半结构化访谈。访谈记录和分析使用里奇和斯宾塞的框架方法。一个专家小组评估了调查结果,并通报了障碍、战略和下一步措施。结果:在10个卫生系统进行了24次访谈。确定的障碍是内部(缺乏组织支持、信息技术差距、临床阻力)和外部(信息技术供应商阻力、制造商支持限制、参考数据差距、缺乏整体UDI系统)。确定的策略包括建立关系、教育、参与和沟通。推进UDI采用的下一步工作重点是教育、研究、支持和政策。结论和意义:UDI实施障碍和策略的描述为卫生系统在临床护理中采用UDI标准和电子文档UDI提供了指导和支持。接下来的步骤阐明了需要关注的关键领域,以推进UDI的采用,并在卫生保健领域实现全面的UDI系统,以加强患者护理和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advancing Patient Safety Surrounding Medical Devices: Barriers, Strategies, and Next Steps in Health System Implementation of Unique Device Identifiers.

Background: The requirement for medical device manufacturers to label their devices with a unique device identifier (UDI) was formalized by the 2013 US Food and Drug Administration Unique Device Identification System Rule. However, parallel regulatory requirement for US health systems to use UDIs, particularly the electronic documentation of UDIs during patient care is lacking. Despite the lack of regulation, some health systems have implemented and are using UDIs. To assess the current state, we studied representative health system UDI implementation experiences, including barriers and the strategies to overcome them, and identified next steps to advance UDI adoption.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were performed with health system personnel involved in UDI implementation in their cardiac catheterization labs or operating rooms. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the framework methodology of Ritchie and Spencer. An expert panel evaluated findings and informed barriers, strategies, and next steps.

Results: Twenty-four interviews at ten health systems were performed. Identified barriers were internal (lack of organizational support, information technology gaps, clinical resistance) and external (information technology vendor resistance, limitations in manufacturer support, gaps in reference data, lack of an overall UDI system). Identified strategies included relationship building, education, engagement, and communication. Next steps to advance UDI adoption focus on education, research, support, and policy.

Conclusions and implications: Delineation of UDI implementation barriers and strategies provides guidance and support for health systems to adopt the UDI standard and electronically document UDIs during clinical care. Next steps illuminate critical areas for attention to advance UDI adoption and achieve a comprehensive UDI system in health care to strengthen patient care and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Initial Validation of the NOL Nociception Level Index® Monitoring System in Black and Multiracial People. Potential of Aluminum Drug Packages with Press-Through Packaging Considering Usability for a Wide Range of Users. The Application Effect of Fine Management Combined with Man-Machine Fixation Mode in Reducing the Attrition Rate of Laparoscopic Instruments-A Non-Randomized, Concurrent Controlled Study. Patients with Growth-Related Disorders and Caregivers Prefer the Somapacitan Device to the Somatrogon Device: Results from a Randomized Crossover Study Assessing Device Preference and Ease of Use Following Simulated Injections. May Glymphatic Drainage Improve Life Quality in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Outpatients?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1