伊朗设拉子医学住院医师对药物相互作用的认识、态度和实践调查。

Q2 Medicine Hospital Topics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-22 DOI:10.1080/00185868.2022.2112917
Laleh Mahmoudi, Gelareh Tajgardoon, Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili, Mohammad Vahid Jorat
{"title":"伊朗设拉子医学住院医师对药物相互作用的认识、态度和实践调查。","authors":"Laleh Mahmoudi, Gelareh Tajgardoon, Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili, Mohammad Vahid Jorat","doi":"10.1080/00185868.2022.2112917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives:</b> Medical residents are among the most important and influential members of the medical team and the level of their knowledge regarding potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is a good predictor of the ability to prevent the occurrence of DDIs, as well as safe and rational prescribing in inpatient settings. This survey was designed to evaluate internal medicine and cardiology residents' knowledge and opinion toward DDIs and to determine different sources of DDI information used by this population. <b>Method:</b> This cross-sectional knowledge attitude practice (KAP) questionnaire study was conducted in Shiraz, Iran. A 25-question questionnaire was designed and completed by 86 internal medicine and cardiology residents. The questions were related to the participants' demographic information, their practice characteristics, the information sources used by the participants, the residents' opinion regarding DDIs, and their knowledge regarding the interaction between 8 drug pairs. <b>Results:</b> The results showed that when the participants wanted to learn more about DDIs, most of them used software on mobile or tablet (59.3%). Nearly three-fourths of the participants (73.82%) reported that when a patient was about to be exposed to a potential DDI, they were informed by software on mobile or tablet that the interaction may be present. On average, residents answered 44.03% ± 23.79 of drug pair questions correctly.<b>Conclusion:</b> Our results show insufficient practice skills, as well as relatively poor knowledge concerning the participants' answers to questions. It seems that further practical training and education are required to enable prescribers to prevent potential DDIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55886,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Topics","volume":" ","pages":"164-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey of Medical Residents' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice about Drug-Drug Interactions, Shiraz, Iran.\",\"authors\":\"Laleh Mahmoudi, Gelareh Tajgardoon, Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili, Mohammad Vahid Jorat\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00185868.2022.2112917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives:</b> Medical residents are among the most important and influential members of the medical team and the level of their knowledge regarding potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is a good predictor of the ability to prevent the occurrence of DDIs, as well as safe and rational prescribing in inpatient settings. This survey was designed to evaluate internal medicine and cardiology residents' knowledge and opinion toward DDIs and to determine different sources of DDI information used by this population. <b>Method:</b> This cross-sectional knowledge attitude practice (KAP) questionnaire study was conducted in Shiraz, Iran. A 25-question questionnaire was designed and completed by 86 internal medicine and cardiology residents. The questions were related to the participants' demographic information, their practice characteristics, the information sources used by the participants, the residents' opinion regarding DDIs, and their knowledge regarding the interaction between 8 drug pairs. <b>Results:</b> The results showed that when the participants wanted to learn more about DDIs, most of them used software on mobile or tablet (59.3%). Nearly three-fourths of the participants (73.82%) reported that when a patient was about to be exposed to a potential DDI, they were informed by software on mobile or tablet that the interaction may be present. On average, residents answered 44.03% ± 23.79 of drug pair questions correctly.<b>Conclusion:</b> Our results show insufficient practice skills, as well as relatively poor knowledge concerning the participants' answers to questions. It seems that further practical training and education are required to enable prescribers to prevent potential DDIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital Topics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"164-172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital Topics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2022.2112917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Topics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2022.2112917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由、目的和目标:住院医师是医疗团队中最重要、最具影响力的成员之一,他们对潜在药物相互作用(DDIs)的了解程度可以很好地预测预防 DDIs 发生的能力,以及在住院环境中安全、合理地开具处方的能力。本调查旨在评估内科和心内科住院医师对 DDIs 的认识和看法,并确定该人群使用的 DDI 信息的不同来源。方法:这项横断面知识态度实践 (KAP) 问卷调查在伊朗设拉子市进行。研究设计了一份包含 25 个问题的问卷,由 86 名内科和心脏病科住院医师填写。问题涉及参与者的人口统计学信息、他们的执业特点、参与者使用的信息来源、住院医师对 DDIs 的看法以及他们对 8 对药物之间相互作用的了解。结果显示结果显示,当参与者想了解更多有关 DDIs 的信息时,他们大多使用手机或平板电脑上的软件(59.3%)。近四分之三的参与者(73.82%)表示,当患者即将接触到潜在的 DDI 时,他们会通过手机或平板电脑上的软件了解到可能存在相互作用。住院医师平均正确回答了44.03%±23.79个药物配对问题:我们的研究结果表明,参与者的实践技能不足,对问题答案的了解也相对较少。看来需要进一步开展实践培训和教育,以使处方人员能够预防潜在的 DDI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Survey of Medical Residents' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice about Drug-Drug Interactions, Shiraz, Iran.

Rationale, aims and objectives: Medical residents are among the most important and influential members of the medical team and the level of their knowledge regarding potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is a good predictor of the ability to prevent the occurrence of DDIs, as well as safe and rational prescribing in inpatient settings. This survey was designed to evaluate internal medicine and cardiology residents' knowledge and opinion toward DDIs and to determine different sources of DDI information used by this population. Method: This cross-sectional knowledge attitude practice (KAP) questionnaire study was conducted in Shiraz, Iran. A 25-question questionnaire was designed and completed by 86 internal medicine and cardiology residents. The questions were related to the participants' demographic information, their practice characteristics, the information sources used by the participants, the residents' opinion regarding DDIs, and their knowledge regarding the interaction between 8 drug pairs. Results: The results showed that when the participants wanted to learn more about DDIs, most of them used software on mobile or tablet (59.3%). Nearly three-fourths of the participants (73.82%) reported that when a patient was about to be exposed to a potential DDI, they were informed by software on mobile or tablet that the interaction may be present. On average, residents answered 44.03% ± 23.79 of drug pair questions correctly.Conclusion: Our results show insufficient practice skills, as well as relatively poor knowledge concerning the participants' answers to questions. It seems that further practical training and education are required to enable prescribers to prevent potential DDIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital Topics
Hospital Topics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Hospital Topics is the longest continuously published healthcare journal in the United States. Since 1922, Hospital Topics has provided healthcare professionals with research they can apply to improve the quality of access, management, and delivery of healthcare. Dedicated to those who bring healthcare to the public, Hospital Topics spans the whole spectrum of healthcare issues including, but not limited to information systems, fatigue management, medication errors, nursing compensation, midwifery, job satisfaction among managers, team building, and bringing primary care to rural areas. Through articles on theory, applied research, and practice, Hospital Topics addresses the central concerns of today"s healthcare professional and leader.
期刊最新文献
Standard Inpatient Class Policy Implementation in Public Hospitals in Indonesia: Strengthening Strategy. Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Simulation Training on the Self-Efficacy and Anxiety of Healthcare Professionals in Managing a Medical Emergency. The Continuing Debate: Do For-Profit Hospitals Provide More Charity Care as Compared to Not-For-Profit Hospitals? Improved Ventilator Weaning and Decannulation Outcomes with Enhanced Staffing Model. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Personnel Involved in Bio Medical Waste Handling about COVID-19 & Its Bio-Medical Waste Management: A Descriptive Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1