患者与医护人员在SUD治疗中的信任与协作:出院后4年住院患者SUD治疗反映的定性研究

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-04 DOI:10.1177/14550725221082366
Turid Wangensteen, Jacob Hystad
{"title":"患者与医护人员在SUD治疗中的信任与协作:出院后4年住院患者SUD治疗反映的定性研究","authors":"Turid Wangensteen,&nbsp;Jacob Hystad","doi":"10.1177/14550725221082366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and aim:</b> Substance use disorder (SUD) is multifactorial, complex, and involves the severe problematic use of alcohol, prescription drugs, and other substances. People with SUD have long histories of perceived stigma, marginalisation, exclusion, social isolation, and shame. Moreover, patients with SUD are often treated as untrustworthy and incapable of actively participating in their treatment planning, even by healthcare and social services workers. <b>Methods:</b> Through in-depth interviews with former patients who have undergone SUD treatment, we explored their reflections on the treatment content. Interpretative phenomenological analysis revealed that some informants experienced aspects of the treatment as valuable, whereas others considered the same treatment useless or harmful. <b>Results:</b> Essential aspects of treatment were developing self-esteem and optimism about the future, developing strategies for coping with stress and challenging emotions and situations, developing relationships with family and friends, and preparing for life after inpatient treatment. Relationships with staff were described as crucial in all parts of the treatment. <b>Conclusion:</b> In conclusion, we suggest that a transition to a more collaborative treatment philosophy would be ethically and professionally valuable for providing support and treatment and enhancing patients' perceptions of empowerment, inclusion, participation, and well-being on their terms, in cooperation with supportive others.</p>","PeriodicalId":46180,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/5e/10.1177_14550725221082366.PMC9379296.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust and collaboration between patients and staff in SUD treatment: A qualitative study of patients' reflections on inpatient SUD treatment four years after discharge.\",\"authors\":\"Turid Wangensteen,&nbsp;Jacob Hystad\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14550725221082366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and aim:</b> Substance use disorder (SUD) is multifactorial, complex, and involves the severe problematic use of alcohol, prescription drugs, and other substances. People with SUD have long histories of perceived stigma, marginalisation, exclusion, social isolation, and shame. Moreover, patients with SUD are often treated as untrustworthy and incapable of actively participating in their treatment planning, even by healthcare and social services workers. <b>Methods:</b> Through in-depth interviews with former patients who have undergone SUD treatment, we explored their reflections on the treatment content. Interpretative phenomenological analysis revealed that some informants experienced aspects of the treatment as valuable, whereas others considered the same treatment useless or harmful. <b>Results:</b> Essential aspects of treatment were developing self-esteem and optimism about the future, developing strategies for coping with stress and challenging emotions and situations, developing relationships with family and friends, and preparing for life after inpatient treatment. Relationships with staff were described as crucial in all parts of the treatment. <b>Conclusion:</b> In conclusion, we suggest that a transition to a more collaborative treatment philosophy would be ethically and professionally valuable for providing support and treatment and enhancing patients' perceptions of empowerment, inclusion, participation, and well-being on their terms, in cooperation with supportive others.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/5e/10.1177_14550725221082366.PMC9379296.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14550725221082366\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/4/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14550725221082366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景与目的:物质使用障碍(SUD)是一种多因素、复杂的疾病,涉及酒精、处方药和其他物质的严重问题使用。患有SUD的人有长期的耻辱感、边缘化、排斥、社会孤立和羞耻的历史。此外,患有SUD的患者通常被认为不值得信任,无法积极参与他们的治疗计划,即使是医疗保健和社会服务工作者。方法:通过对曾接受过SUD治疗的患者进行深度访谈,探讨他们对治疗内容的思考。解释性现象学分析显示,一些举报人认为治疗的某些方面是有价值的,而另一些人则认为同样的治疗是无用或有害的。结果:治疗的基本方面是培养自尊和对未来的乐观态度,发展应对压力和具有挑战性的情绪和情况的策略,发展与家人和朋友的关系,并为住院治疗后的生活做好准备。与工作人员的关系在治疗的所有部分都是至关重要的。结论:总之,我们建议,在与支持性他人合作的情况下,向更加协作的治疗理念过渡,对于提供支持和治疗,增强患者对授权、包容、参与和福祉的感知,在伦理和专业上都是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trust and collaboration between patients and staff in SUD treatment: A qualitative study of patients' reflections on inpatient SUD treatment four years after discharge.

Background and aim: Substance use disorder (SUD) is multifactorial, complex, and involves the severe problematic use of alcohol, prescription drugs, and other substances. People with SUD have long histories of perceived stigma, marginalisation, exclusion, social isolation, and shame. Moreover, patients with SUD are often treated as untrustworthy and incapable of actively participating in their treatment planning, even by healthcare and social services workers. Methods: Through in-depth interviews with former patients who have undergone SUD treatment, we explored their reflections on the treatment content. Interpretative phenomenological analysis revealed that some informants experienced aspects of the treatment as valuable, whereas others considered the same treatment useless or harmful. Results: Essential aspects of treatment were developing self-esteem and optimism about the future, developing strategies for coping with stress and challenging emotions and situations, developing relationships with family and friends, and preparing for life after inpatient treatment. Relationships with staff were described as crucial in all parts of the treatment. Conclusion: In conclusion, we suggest that a transition to a more collaborative treatment philosophy would be ethically and professionally valuable for providing support and treatment and enhancing patients' perceptions of empowerment, inclusion, participation, and well-being on their terms, in cooperation with supportive others.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
36
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Alcohol purchases through online stores and mobile applications in the late phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland. Children's out-of-home placements: Associations with parental substance use and neighbourhood sociodemographics. Colliding harms of gambling and gaming: A four-wave longitudinal population study of at-risk gambling and gaming in Finland. Svenska narkotikapolisföreningens tidskrift - polisens bild av ett problem? Voluntary self-exclusion from gambling: Expert opinions on gaps and needs for improvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1