胃十二指肠重叠吻合术在腹腔镜胃癌远端切除术后Billroth I型吻合中的应用。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2022-08-12 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/9094934
Guojun Chen, Wenhuan Li, Weihua Yu, Dong Cen, Xianfa Wang, Peng Luo, Jiafei Yan, Guofu Chen, Yiping Zhu, Linhua Zhu
{"title":"胃十二指肠重叠吻合术在腹腔镜胃癌远端切除术后Billroth I型吻合中的应用。","authors":"Guojun Chen,&nbsp;Wenhuan Li,&nbsp;Weihua Yu,&nbsp;Dong Cen,&nbsp;Xianfa Wang,&nbsp;Peng Luo,&nbsp;Jiafei Yan,&nbsp;Guofu Chen,&nbsp;Yiping Zhu,&nbsp;Linhua Zhu","doi":"10.1155/2022/9094934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy (DSGD) and overlap gastroduodenostomy (OGD) are the two most widely used intracorporeal Billroth I anastomosis methods after distal gastrectomy. In this study, we compared the short-term outcomes of DSGD and OGD in total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG). In a retrospective cohort study, we examined 92 gastric cancer patients who underwent TLDG performed by the same surgeon between January 2014 and June 2018. All patients underwent Billroth I reconstruction (OGD, <i>n</i> = 45; DSGD, <i>n</i> = 47) and D2 lymph node dissection. We retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes, clinical pathological results, and endoscopy results. Laparoscopic surgery was successfully performed in both groups without conversion to open surgery. The demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in operation time (158.9 ± 13.6 min vs. 158.8 ± 14.8 min, <i>P</i>=0.955), anastomotic time (19.4 ± 3.0 min vs. 18.8 ± 2.9 min, <i>P</i>=0.354), intraoperative blood loss (88.9 ± 25.4 mL vs. 83.7 ± 24.3 mL, <i>P</i>=0.321), number of lymph node dissections (31.0 ± 7.1 vs. 29.2 ± 7.5, <i>P</i>=0.229), length of hospital stay (8.8 ± 2.7 days vs. 9.1 ± 3.0 days, <i>P</i>=0.636), fluid intake time (3.1 ± 0.7 days vs. 3.2 ± 0.7 days, <i>P</i>=0.914), and morbidity of postoperative complications (6.7% [3/45] vs. 10.6% [5/47], <i>P</i>=0.499). Endoscopy performed 6 months postoperatively showed that the residual food (<i>P</i>=0.033), gastritis (<i>P</i>=0.029), and bile (<i>P</i>=0.022) classification score significantly decreased in the OGD group, and there were no significant differences 12 months postoperatively. OGD is a safe and effective reconstruction technique with comparable postoperative surgical outcomes and endoscopy results when compared with those of DSGD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48755,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"9094934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391180/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Overlap Gastroduodenostomy in Billroth I Anastomosis after Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Guojun Chen,&nbsp;Wenhuan Li,&nbsp;Weihua Yu,&nbsp;Dong Cen,&nbsp;Xianfa Wang,&nbsp;Peng Luo,&nbsp;Jiafei Yan,&nbsp;Guofu Chen,&nbsp;Yiping Zhu,&nbsp;Linhua Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/9094934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy (DSGD) and overlap gastroduodenostomy (OGD) are the two most widely used intracorporeal Billroth I anastomosis methods after distal gastrectomy. In this study, we compared the short-term outcomes of DSGD and OGD in total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG). In a retrospective cohort study, we examined 92 gastric cancer patients who underwent TLDG performed by the same surgeon between January 2014 and June 2018. All patients underwent Billroth I reconstruction (OGD, <i>n</i> = 45; DSGD, <i>n</i> = 47) and D2 lymph node dissection. We retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes, clinical pathological results, and endoscopy results. Laparoscopic surgery was successfully performed in both groups without conversion to open surgery. The demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in operation time (158.9 ± 13.6 min vs. 158.8 ± 14.8 min, <i>P</i>=0.955), anastomotic time (19.4 ± 3.0 min vs. 18.8 ± 2.9 min, <i>P</i>=0.354), intraoperative blood loss (88.9 ± 25.4 mL vs. 83.7 ± 24.3 mL, <i>P</i>=0.321), number of lymph node dissections (31.0 ± 7.1 vs. 29.2 ± 7.5, <i>P</i>=0.229), length of hospital stay (8.8 ± 2.7 days vs. 9.1 ± 3.0 days, <i>P</i>=0.636), fluid intake time (3.1 ± 0.7 days vs. 3.2 ± 0.7 days, <i>P</i>=0.914), and morbidity of postoperative complications (6.7% [3/45] vs. 10.6% [5/47], <i>P</i>=0.499). Endoscopy performed 6 months postoperatively showed that the residual food (<i>P</i>=0.033), gastritis (<i>P</i>=0.029), and bile (<i>P</i>=0.022) classification score significantly decreased in the OGD group, and there were no significant differences 12 months postoperatively. OGD is a safe and effective reconstruction technique with comparable postoperative surgical outcomes and endoscopy results when compared with those of DSGD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9094934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391180/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9094934\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9094934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

三角型胃十二指肠吻合术(DSGD)和重叠型胃十二指肠吻合术(OGD)是胃远端切除术后最广泛应用的两种胃内Billroth I吻合方法。在本研究中,我们比较了DSGD和OGD在腹腔镜胃远端全切除术(TLDG)中的短期疗效。在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们调查了2014年1月至2018年6月期间由同一外科医生进行TLDG手术的92名胃癌患者。所有患者均行Billroth I期重建(OGD, n = 45;DSGD, n = 47)和D2淋巴结清扫。我们回顾了手术结果、临床病理结果和内窥镜检查结果。两组均成功行腹腔镜手术,未转开腹手术。两组患者人口学及临床特征比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组之间没有显著差异操作时间(158.9±13.6分钟和158.8±14.8分钟,P = 0.955),吻合的时间(19.4±3.0分钟和18.8±2.9分钟,P = 0.354),术中失血(88.9±25.4毫升和83.7±24.3毫升,P = 0.321),数量的淋巴结解剖(31.0±7.1和29.2±7.5,P = 0.229),住院时间(8.8±2.7天、9.1±3.0天,P = 0.636),液体摄入量时间(3.1±0.7天、3.2±0.7天,P = 0.914),术后并发症发生率(6.7% [3/45]vs. 10.6% [5/47], P=0.499)。术后6个月内镜检查显示,OGD组残食(P=0.033)、胃炎(P=0.029)、胆汁(P=0.022)分级评分明显降低,术后12个月差异无统计学意义。OGD是一种安全有效的重建技术,与DSGD相比,其术后手术效果和内镜检查结果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of Overlap Gastroduodenostomy in Billroth I Anastomosis after Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

Delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy (DSGD) and overlap gastroduodenostomy (OGD) are the two most widely used intracorporeal Billroth I anastomosis methods after distal gastrectomy. In this study, we compared the short-term outcomes of DSGD and OGD in total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG). In a retrospective cohort study, we examined 92 gastric cancer patients who underwent TLDG performed by the same surgeon between January 2014 and June 2018. All patients underwent Billroth I reconstruction (OGD, n = 45; DSGD, n = 47) and D2 lymph node dissection. We retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes, clinical pathological results, and endoscopy results. Laparoscopic surgery was successfully performed in both groups without conversion to open surgery. The demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in operation time (158.9 ± 13.6 min vs. 158.8 ± 14.8 min, P=0.955), anastomotic time (19.4 ± 3.0 min vs. 18.8 ± 2.9 min, P=0.354), intraoperative blood loss (88.9 ± 25.4 mL vs. 83.7 ± 24.3 mL, P=0.321), number of lymph node dissections (31.0 ± 7.1 vs. 29.2 ± 7.5, P=0.229), length of hospital stay (8.8 ± 2.7 days vs. 9.1 ± 3.0 days, P=0.636), fluid intake time (3.1 ± 0.7 days vs. 3.2 ± 0.7 days, P=0.914), and morbidity of postoperative complications (6.7% [3/45] vs. 10.6% [5/47], P=0.499). Endoscopy performed 6 months postoperatively showed that the residual food (P=0.033), gastritis (P=0.029), and bile (P=0.022) classification score significantly decreased in the OGD group, and there were no significant differences 12 months postoperatively. OGD is a safe and effective reconstruction technique with comparable postoperative surgical outcomes and endoscopy results when compared with those of DSGD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of gastroenterology and liver disease - medicine and surgery. The Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is sponsored by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.
期刊最新文献
Acute Variceal Hemorrhage in Germany-A Nationwide Study of 65,357 Hospitalized Cases: Variceal Hemorrhage in Germany. The Predictive Value of Time-Varying Noninvasive Scores on Long-Term Prognosis of NAFLD in South Korea. Feasibility and Acceptability of Antenatal Hepatitis C Screening: A Pilot Study. Primary Care Support Tools for Digestive Health Care: A Mixed Method Study. Long-Term Treatment with Bulevirtide in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis D and Advanced Chronic Liver Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1