自我代表的见证:澳大利亚离岸移民拘留中心寻求庇护者使用社交媒体。

Media, culture, and society Pub Date : 2018-05-01 Epub Date: 2017-12-12 DOI:10.1177/0163443717746229
Maria Rae, Rosa Holman, Amy Nethery
{"title":"自我代表的见证:澳大利亚离岸移民拘留中心寻求庇护者使用社交媒体。","authors":"Maria Rae,&nbsp;Rosa Holman,&nbsp;Amy Nethery","doi":"10.1177/0163443717746229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The act of witnessing connects audiences with distant suffering. But what happens when bearing witness becomes severely restricted? External parties, including the mainstream news media, are constrained from accessing Australia's offshore immigration detention centres. The effect is that people seeking asylum are hidden from the public and excluded from national debates. Some detainees have adopted social media as a platform to communicate their stories of flight, and their experiences of immigration detention, to a wider audience. This article examines the ways in which social media, and particularly Facebook, has facilitated what we call self-represented witnessing. We analyse two public Facebook pages to assess how detainees use such social media networks to document their experiences, and we observe the interaction between detainees, other social media users and mainstream media. Significantly, these social media networks enable detained asylum seekers to conduct an unmediated form of self-represented witnessing that exposes human rights abuses and documents justice claims.</p>","PeriodicalId":74138,"journal":{"name":"Media, culture, and society","volume":"40 4","pages":"479-495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0163443717746229","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-represented witnessing: the use of social media by asylum seekers in Australia's offshore immigration detention centres.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Rae,&nbsp;Rosa Holman,&nbsp;Amy Nethery\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0163443717746229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The act of witnessing connects audiences with distant suffering. But what happens when bearing witness becomes severely restricted? External parties, including the mainstream news media, are constrained from accessing Australia's offshore immigration detention centres. The effect is that people seeking asylum are hidden from the public and excluded from national debates. Some detainees have adopted social media as a platform to communicate their stories of flight, and their experiences of immigration detention, to a wider audience. This article examines the ways in which social media, and particularly Facebook, has facilitated what we call self-represented witnessing. We analyse two public Facebook pages to assess how detainees use such social media networks to document their experiences, and we observe the interaction between detainees, other social media users and mainstream media. Significantly, these social media networks enable detained asylum seekers to conduct an unmediated form of self-represented witnessing that exposes human rights abuses and documents justice claims.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Media, culture, and society\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"479-495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0163443717746229\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Media, culture, and society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717746229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/12/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media, culture, and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717746229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

目睹的行为将观众与遥远的苦难联系起来。但当作证受到严格限制时会发生什么呢?包括主流新闻媒体在内的外部各方被限制进入澳大利亚的离岸移民拘留中心。其结果是,寻求庇护的人被隐藏在公众面前,被排除在全国辩论之外。一些被拘留者将社交媒体作为一个平台,向更广泛的受众传播他们的逃亡故事和移民拘留经历。这篇文章探讨了社交媒体,尤其是Facebook,促进了我们所说的自我代表的见证。我们分析了两个公开的Facebook页面,以评估被拘留者如何使用这种社交媒体网络来记录他们的经历,我们观察了被拘留者、其他社交媒体用户和主流媒体之间的互动。重要的是,这些社交媒体网络使被拘留的寻求庇护者能够进行无中介的自我代表见证,揭露侵犯人权行为并记录司法要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self-represented witnessing: the use of social media by asylum seekers in Australia's offshore immigration detention centres.

The act of witnessing connects audiences with distant suffering. But what happens when bearing witness becomes severely restricted? External parties, including the mainstream news media, are constrained from accessing Australia's offshore immigration detention centres. The effect is that people seeking asylum are hidden from the public and excluded from national debates. Some detainees have adopted social media as a platform to communicate their stories of flight, and their experiences of immigration detention, to a wider audience. This article examines the ways in which social media, and particularly Facebook, has facilitated what we call self-represented witnessing. We analyse two public Facebook pages to assess how detainees use such social media networks to document their experiences, and we observe the interaction between detainees, other social media users and mainstream media. Significantly, these social media networks enable detained asylum seekers to conduct an unmediated form of self-represented witnessing that exposes human rights abuses and documents justice claims.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poland as Gilead. Pop culture fiction and performative protests in the era of the pandemic Between existential mobility and intimacy 5.0: translocal care in pandemic times. Media power in digital Asia: Super apps and megacorps. More than a sex crime: a feminist political economy of the 2014 iCloud hack Beyond platform capitalism: critical perspectives on Facebook markets from Melanesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1