应用数据挖掘技术评价与降压治疗成功相关的危险因素。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/10742484221136758
Selçuk Şen, Denizhan Demirkol, Mert Kaşkal, Murat Gezer, Ayşenur Yaman Bucak, Nermin Gürel, Yasemin Selalmaz, Çiğdem Erol, Ali Yağız Üresin
{"title":"应用数据挖掘技术评价与降压治疗成功相关的危险因素。","authors":"Selçuk Şen,&nbsp;Denizhan Demirkol,&nbsp;Mert Kaşkal,&nbsp;Murat Gezer,&nbsp;Ayşenur Yaman Bucak,&nbsp;Nermin Gürel,&nbsp;Yasemin Selalmaz,&nbsp;Çiğdem Erol,&nbsp;Ali Yağız Üresin","doi":"10.1177/10742484221136758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of potential risk factors on antihypertensive treatment success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with hypertension who were treated with antihypertensive medications were included in this study. Data from the last visit were analyzed retrospectively for each patient. To evaluate the predictive models for antihypertensive treatment success, data mining algorithms (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, and artificial neural network) using 5-fold cross-validation were applied. Additionally, study parameters between patients with controlled and uncontrolled hypertension were statistically compared and multiple regression analyses were conducted for secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data of 592 patients were included in the analysis. The overall blood pressure control rate was 44%. The performance of random forest algorithm (accuracy = 97.46%, precision = 97.08%, F1 score = 97.04%) was slightly higher than other data mining algorithms including logistic regression (accuracy = 87.31%, precision = 86.21%, F1 score = 85.74%), decision tree (accuracy = 76.94%, precision = 70.64%, F1 score = 76.54%), and artificial neural network (accuracy = 86.47%, precision = 83.85%, F1 score = 84.86%). The top 5 important categorical variables (predictive correlation value) contributed the most to the prediction of antihypertensive treatment success were use of calcium channel blocker (-0.18), number of antihypertensive medications (0.18), female gender (0.10), alcohol use (-0.09) and attendance at regular follow up visits (0.09), respectively. The top 5 numerical variables contributed the most to the prediction of antihypertensive treatment success were blood urea nitrogen (-0.12), glucose (-0.12), hemoglobin A1c (-0.12), uric acid (-0.09) and creatinine (-0.07), respectively. According to the decision tree model; age, gender, regular attendance at follow-up visits, and diabetes status were identified as the most critical patterns for stratifying the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data mining algorithms have the potential to produce predictive models for screening the antihypertensive treatment success. Further research on larger populations and longitudinal datasets are required to improve the models.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Risk Factors Associated With Antihypertensive Treatment Success Employing Data Mining Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Selçuk Şen,&nbsp;Denizhan Demirkol,&nbsp;Mert Kaşkal,&nbsp;Murat Gezer,&nbsp;Ayşenur Yaman Bucak,&nbsp;Nermin Gürel,&nbsp;Yasemin Selalmaz,&nbsp;Çiğdem Erol,&nbsp;Ali Yağız Üresin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10742484221136758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of potential risk factors on antihypertensive treatment success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with hypertension who were treated with antihypertensive medications were included in this study. Data from the last visit were analyzed retrospectively for each patient. To evaluate the predictive models for antihypertensive treatment success, data mining algorithms (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, and artificial neural network) using 5-fold cross-validation were applied. Additionally, study parameters between patients with controlled and uncontrolled hypertension were statistically compared and multiple regression analyses were conducted for secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data of 592 patients were included in the analysis. The overall blood pressure control rate was 44%. The performance of random forest algorithm (accuracy = 97.46%, precision = 97.08%, F1 score = 97.04%) was slightly higher than other data mining algorithms including logistic regression (accuracy = 87.31%, precision = 86.21%, F1 score = 85.74%), decision tree (accuracy = 76.94%, precision = 70.64%, F1 score = 76.54%), and artificial neural network (accuracy = 86.47%, precision = 83.85%, F1 score = 84.86%). The top 5 important categorical variables (predictive correlation value) contributed the most to the prediction of antihypertensive treatment success were use of calcium channel blocker (-0.18), number of antihypertensive medications (0.18), female gender (0.10), alcohol use (-0.09) and attendance at regular follow up visits (0.09), respectively. The top 5 numerical variables contributed the most to the prediction of antihypertensive treatment success were blood urea nitrogen (-0.12), glucose (-0.12), hemoglobin A1c (-0.12), uric acid (-0.09) and creatinine (-0.07), respectively. According to the decision tree model; age, gender, regular attendance at follow-up visits, and diabetes status were identified as the most critical patterns for stratifying the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data mining algorithms have the potential to produce predictive models for screening the antihypertensive treatment success. Further research on larger populations and longitudinal datasets are required to improve the models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484221136758\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484221136758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨潜在危险因素对降压治疗成功的影响。方法:采用降压药治疗的高血压患者为研究对象。回顾性分析每位患者最后一次就诊的资料。为了评估降压治疗成功的预测模型,采用了5倍交叉验证的数据挖掘算法(逻辑回归、决策树、随机森林和人工神经网络)。并对高血压控制与未控制患者的研究参数进行统计学比较,对次要终点进行多元回归分析。结果:592例患者资料纳入分析。总体血压控制率为44%。随机森林算法(准确率为97.46%,精度为97.08%,F1分数为97.04%)的性能略高于逻辑回归(准确率为87.31%,精度为86.21%,F1分数为85.74%)、决策树(准确率为76.94%,精度为70.64%,F1分数为76.54%)和人工神经网络(准确率为86.47%,精度为83.85%,F1分数为84.86%)等其他数据挖掘算法。对降压治疗成功预测贡献最大的前5个重要分类变量(预测相关值)分别为钙通道阻滞剂的使用(-0.18)、降压药物的使用次数(0.18)、女性性别(0.10)、酒精使用(-0.09)和定期随访(0.09)。对降压治疗成功预测贡献最大的前5位数值变量分别为尿素氮(-0.12)、葡萄糖(-0.12)、血红蛋白A1c(-0.12)、尿酸(-0.09)和肌酐(-0.07)。根据决策树模型;年龄、性别、定期随访和糖尿病状况被确定为患者分层的最关键模式。结论:数据挖掘算法有潜力为筛选降压治疗成功建立预测模型。需要对更大的人口和纵向数据集进行进一步的研究来改进模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Risk Factors Associated With Antihypertensive Treatment Success Employing Data Mining Techniques.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of potential risk factors on antihypertensive treatment success.

Methods: Patients with hypertension who were treated with antihypertensive medications were included in this study. Data from the last visit were analyzed retrospectively for each patient. To evaluate the predictive models for antihypertensive treatment success, data mining algorithms (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, and artificial neural network) using 5-fold cross-validation were applied. Additionally, study parameters between patients with controlled and uncontrolled hypertension were statistically compared and multiple regression analyses were conducted for secondary endpoints.

Results: The data of 592 patients were included in the analysis. The overall blood pressure control rate was 44%. The performance of random forest algorithm (accuracy = 97.46%, precision = 97.08%, F1 score = 97.04%) was slightly higher than other data mining algorithms including logistic regression (accuracy = 87.31%, precision = 86.21%, F1 score = 85.74%), decision tree (accuracy = 76.94%, precision = 70.64%, F1 score = 76.54%), and artificial neural network (accuracy = 86.47%, precision = 83.85%, F1 score = 84.86%). The top 5 important categorical variables (predictive correlation value) contributed the most to the prediction of antihypertensive treatment success were use of calcium channel blocker (-0.18), number of antihypertensive medications (0.18), female gender (0.10), alcohol use (-0.09) and attendance at regular follow up visits (0.09), respectively. The top 5 numerical variables contributed the most to the prediction of antihypertensive treatment success were blood urea nitrogen (-0.12), glucose (-0.12), hemoglobin A1c (-0.12), uric acid (-0.09) and creatinine (-0.07), respectively. According to the decision tree model; age, gender, regular attendance at follow-up visits, and diabetes status were identified as the most critical patterns for stratifying the patients.

Conclusion: Data mining algorithms have the potential to produce predictive models for screening the antihypertensive treatment success. Further research on larger populations and longitudinal datasets are required to improve the models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JCPT) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical application to cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. Experimental studies focus on translational research. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
The Role of JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway and Its Downstream Influencing Factors in the Treatment of Atherosclerosis Exposure to Electronic Waterpipes Increases the Risk of Occlusive Cardiovascular Disease in C57BL/6J Mice Thanks to Reviewers Prognostic Implications of Immature Platelet Fraction at 5-Year Follow-up Among ACS Patients Treated With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy. Assessment of Dofetilide or Sotalol Tolerability in the Elderly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1