利用IDEAL框架评估术中解剖可视化荧光成像的发展状况。

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2022-11-04 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000156
Takeaki Ishizawa, Peter McCulloch, Laurents Stassen, Jacqueline van den Bos, Jean-Marc Regimbeau, Jeanne Dembinski, Sylke Schneider-Koriath, Luigi Boni, Takeshi Aoki, Hiroto Nishino, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Yasuo Sekine, Toyofumi Chen-Yoshikawa, Trevor Yeung, Eren Berber, Bora Kahramangil, Michael Bouvet, Michele Diana, Norihiro Kokudo, Fernando Dip, Kevin White, Raul J Rosenthal
{"title":"利用IDEAL框架评估术中解剖可视化荧光成像的发展状况。","authors":"Takeaki Ishizawa,&nbsp;Peter McCulloch,&nbsp;Laurents Stassen,&nbsp;Jacqueline van den Bos,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Regimbeau,&nbsp;Jeanne Dembinski,&nbsp;Sylke Schneider-Koriath,&nbsp;Luigi Boni,&nbsp;Takeshi Aoki,&nbsp;Hiroto Nishino,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Hasegawa,&nbsp;Yasuo Sekine,&nbsp;Toyofumi Chen-Yoshikawa,&nbsp;Trevor Yeung,&nbsp;Eren Berber,&nbsp;Bora Kahramangil,&nbsp;Michael Bouvet,&nbsp;Michele Diana,&nbsp;Norihiro Kokudo,&nbsp;Fernando Dip,&nbsp;Kevin White,&nbsp;Raul J Rosenthal","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intraoperative fluorescence imaging is currently used in a variety of surgical fields for four main purposes: visualising anatomy, assessing tissue perfusion, identifying/localising cancer and mapping lymphatic systems. To establish evidence-based guidance for research and practice, understanding the state of research on fluorescence imaging in different surgical fields is needed. We evaluated the evidence on fluorescence imaging used to visualise anatomical structures using the IDEAL framework, a framework designed to describe the stages of innovation in surgery and other interventional procedures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>IDEAL staging based on a thorough literature review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All publications on intraoperative fluorescence imaging for visualising anatomical structures reported in PubMed through 2020 were identified for five surgical procedures: cholangiography, hepatic segmentation, lung segmentation, ureterography and parathyroid identification.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The IDEAL stage of research evidence was determined for each of the five procedures using a previously described approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>225 articles (8427 cases) were selected for analysis. Current status of research evidence on fluorescence imaging was rated IDEAL stage 2a for ureterography and lung segmentation, IDEAL 2b for hepatic segmentation and IDEAL stage 3 for cholangiography and parathyroid identification. Enhanced tissue identification rates using fluorescence imaging relative to conventional white-light imaging have been documented for all five procedures by comparative studies including randomised controlled trials for cholangiography and parathyroid identification. Advantages of anatomy visualisation with fluorescence imaging for improving short-term and long-term postoperative outcomes also were demonstrated, especially for hepatobiliary surgery and (para)thyroidectomy. No adverse reactions associated with fluorescent agents were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative fluorescence imaging can be used safely to enhance the identification of anatomical structures, which may lead to improved postoperative outcomes. Overviewing current research knowledge using the IDEAL framework aids in designing further studies to develop fluorescence imaging techniques into an essential intraoperative navigation tool in each surgical field.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/58/15/bmjsit-2022-000156.PMC9639126.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the development status of intraoperative fluorescence imaging for anatomy visualisation, using the IDEAL framework.\",\"authors\":\"Takeaki Ishizawa,&nbsp;Peter McCulloch,&nbsp;Laurents Stassen,&nbsp;Jacqueline van den Bos,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Regimbeau,&nbsp;Jeanne Dembinski,&nbsp;Sylke Schneider-Koriath,&nbsp;Luigi Boni,&nbsp;Takeshi Aoki,&nbsp;Hiroto Nishino,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Hasegawa,&nbsp;Yasuo Sekine,&nbsp;Toyofumi Chen-Yoshikawa,&nbsp;Trevor Yeung,&nbsp;Eren Berber,&nbsp;Bora Kahramangil,&nbsp;Michael Bouvet,&nbsp;Michele Diana,&nbsp;Norihiro Kokudo,&nbsp;Fernando Dip,&nbsp;Kevin White,&nbsp;Raul J Rosenthal\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intraoperative fluorescence imaging is currently used in a variety of surgical fields for four main purposes: visualising anatomy, assessing tissue perfusion, identifying/localising cancer and mapping lymphatic systems. To establish evidence-based guidance for research and practice, understanding the state of research on fluorescence imaging in different surgical fields is needed. We evaluated the evidence on fluorescence imaging used to visualise anatomical structures using the IDEAL framework, a framework designed to describe the stages of innovation in surgery and other interventional procedures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>IDEAL staging based on a thorough literature review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All publications on intraoperative fluorescence imaging for visualising anatomical structures reported in PubMed through 2020 were identified for five surgical procedures: cholangiography, hepatic segmentation, lung segmentation, ureterography and parathyroid identification.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The IDEAL stage of research evidence was determined for each of the five procedures using a previously described approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>225 articles (8427 cases) were selected for analysis. Current status of research evidence on fluorescence imaging was rated IDEAL stage 2a for ureterography and lung segmentation, IDEAL 2b for hepatic segmentation and IDEAL stage 3 for cholangiography and parathyroid identification. Enhanced tissue identification rates using fluorescence imaging relative to conventional white-light imaging have been documented for all five procedures by comparative studies including randomised controlled trials for cholangiography and parathyroid identification. Advantages of anatomy visualisation with fluorescence imaging for improving short-term and long-term postoperative outcomes also were demonstrated, especially for hepatobiliary surgery and (para)thyroidectomy. No adverse reactions associated with fluorescent agents were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative fluorescence imaging can be used safely to enhance the identification of anatomical structures, which may lead to improved postoperative outcomes. Overviewing current research knowledge using the IDEAL framework aids in designing further studies to develop fluorescence imaging techniques into an essential intraoperative navigation tool in each surgical field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/58/15/bmjsit-2022-000156.PMC9639126.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:术中荧光成像目前用于各种手术领域,主要有四个目的:解剖可视化,评估组织灌注,识别/定位癌症和绘制淋巴系统。了解荧光成像在不同外科领域的研究现状,为研究和实践提供循证指导。我们使用IDEAL框架评估了用于可视化解剖结构的荧光成像证据,IDEAL框架旨在描述手术和其他介入手术的创新阶段。设计:在全面文献回顾的基础上进行IDEAL分期。背景:到2020年,PubMed上报道的所有术中荧光成像用于可视化解剖结构的出版物被确定为五种外科手术:胆管造影、肝分割、肺分割、输尿管造影和甲状旁腺识别。主要结果测量:使用先前描述的方法确定了五个程序中每个程序的理想阶段研究证据。结果:选取225篇文献(8427例)进行分析。目前荧光成像研究证据现状:输尿管造影及肺分割为理想2a级,肝分割为理想2b级,胆管造影及甲状旁腺识别为理想3级。通过包括胆管造影和甲状旁腺识别的随机对照试验在内的比较研究,荧光成像相对于传统白光成像提高了组织识别率。荧光成像在改善短期和长期术后预后方面的优势也得到了证实,特别是在肝胆手术和甲状腺切除术中。未见与荧光剂相关的不良反应报道。结论:术中荧光成像可安全用于增强解剖结构的识别,可改善术后预后。利用IDEAL框架概述当前的研究知识有助于设计进一步的研究,将荧光成像技术发展成为每个手术领域必不可少的术中导航工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the development status of intraoperative fluorescence imaging for anatomy visualisation, using the IDEAL framework.

Objectives: Intraoperative fluorescence imaging is currently used in a variety of surgical fields for four main purposes: visualising anatomy, assessing tissue perfusion, identifying/localising cancer and mapping lymphatic systems. To establish evidence-based guidance for research and practice, understanding the state of research on fluorescence imaging in different surgical fields is needed. We evaluated the evidence on fluorescence imaging used to visualise anatomical structures using the IDEAL framework, a framework designed to describe the stages of innovation in surgery and other interventional procedures.

Design: IDEAL staging based on a thorough literature review.

Setting: All publications on intraoperative fluorescence imaging for visualising anatomical structures reported in PubMed through 2020 were identified for five surgical procedures: cholangiography, hepatic segmentation, lung segmentation, ureterography and parathyroid identification.

Main outcome measures: The IDEAL stage of research evidence was determined for each of the five procedures using a previously described approach.

Results: 225 articles (8427 cases) were selected for analysis. Current status of research evidence on fluorescence imaging was rated IDEAL stage 2a for ureterography and lung segmentation, IDEAL 2b for hepatic segmentation and IDEAL stage 3 for cholangiography and parathyroid identification. Enhanced tissue identification rates using fluorescence imaging relative to conventional white-light imaging have been documented for all five procedures by comparative studies including randomised controlled trials for cholangiography and parathyroid identification. Advantages of anatomy visualisation with fluorescence imaging for improving short-term and long-term postoperative outcomes also were demonstrated, especially for hepatobiliary surgery and (para)thyroidectomy. No adverse reactions associated with fluorescent agents were reported.

Conclusions: Intraoperative fluorescence imaging can be used safely to enhance the identification of anatomical structures, which may lead to improved postoperative outcomes. Overviewing current research knowledge using the IDEAL framework aids in designing further studies to develop fluorescence imaging techniques into an essential intraoperative navigation tool in each surgical field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of adjuvant antibiotic hydrogel application on the primary stability of uncemented hip stems. Prospective randomized evaluation of the sustained impact of assistive artificial intelligence on anesthetists' ultrasound scanning for regional anesthesia. Clinical effectiveness of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique compared with a standard lateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures (HemiSPAIRE): a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. IDEAL evaluation for global surgery innovation. No frugal innovation without frugal evaluation: the Global IDEAL Sub-Framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1