孕前医疗保健的卫生经济学和公平性:一项系统综述。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Seminars in reproductive medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1749684
Alayna Carrandi, Claudia Bull, Emily Callander
{"title":"孕前医疗保健的卫生经济学和公平性:一项系统综述。","authors":"Alayna Carrandi,&nbsp;Claudia Bull,&nbsp;Emily Callander","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1749684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Poor pregnancy outcomes affect a child's lifelong health and disadvantaged populations are at higher risk of poor pregnancy outcomes. Preconception care aims to improve pregnancy outcomes by managing conditions and risks prior to conception. Given known inequities in pregnancy outcomes, the adoption of preconception care may benefit disadvantaged populations. Health economics plays an important role in the implementation of interventions, as economic evaluations seek to identify the most efficient and equitable care options. This review aimed to identify the cost-effectiveness of preconception care and how equity has been considered in these evaluations. A systematic review of literature published between 2012-2022 was undertaken to identify studies that evaluate the economic outcomes of preconception care. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were manually searched for consideration of equity in the economic evaluation analysis. Costs were presented and a narrative synthesis of studies reporting on outcomes of equity was conducted. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, and only two reported on aspects of equity, specifically ethnicity. Considering the significant disparities in pregnancy outcomes among disadvantaged populations, aspects of equity are important to consider when implementing and evaluating preconception interventions. Therefore, it is recommended that future research focuses on the cost-effectiveness of preconception care and that these evaluations incorporate aspects of equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21661,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in reproductive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Economics and Equity in Preconception Health Care: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Alayna Carrandi,&nbsp;Claudia Bull,&nbsp;Emily Callander\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1749684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Poor pregnancy outcomes affect a child's lifelong health and disadvantaged populations are at higher risk of poor pregnancy outcomes. Preconception care aims to improve pregnancy outcomes by managing conditions and risks prior to conception. Given known inequities in pregnancy outcomes, the adoption of preconception care may benefit disadvantaged populations. Health economics plays an important role in the implementation of interventions, as economic evaluations seek to identify the most efficient and equitable care options. This review aimed to identify the cost-effectiveness of preconception care and how equity has been considered in these evaluations. A systematic review of literature published between 2012-2022 was undertaken to identify studies that evaluate the economic outcomes of preconception care. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were manually searched for consideration of equity in the economic evaluation analysis. Costs were presented and a narrative synthesis of studies reporting on outcomes of equity was conducted. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, and only two reported on aspects of equity, specifically ethnicity. Considering the significant disparities in pregnancy outcomes among disadvantaged populations, aspects of equity are important to consider when implementing and evaluating preconception interventions. Therefore, it is recommended that future research focuses on the cost-effectiveness of preconception care and that these evaluations incorporate aspects of equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1749684\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1749684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

不良妊娠结果影响儿童的终身健康,处境不利的人群妊娠结果不良的风险更高。孕前护理旨在通过管理孕前条件和风险来改善妊娠结果。鉴于已知的妊娠结局不公平,孕前护理的采用可能有利于弱势群体。卫生经济学在实施干预措施方面发挥着重要作用,因为经济评估力求确定最有效和最公平的护理选择。本综述旨在确定孕前护理的成本效益,以及在这些评估中如何考虑公平性。对2012-2022年间发表的文献进行了系统回顾,以确定评估孕前护理经济结果的研究。为了在经济评价分析中考虑公平性,我们手动搜索了符合纳入标准的研究。提出了费用,并对报告公平结果的研究进行了叙述综合。八项研究符合纳入标准,只有两项研究报告了公平方面,特别是种族方面。考虑到弱势群体怀孕结果的显著差异,在实施和评估孕前干预措施时,公平方面是重要的考虑因素。因此,建议未来的研究集中在孕前护理的成本效益上,这些评估应纳入公平的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health Economics and Equity in Preconception Health Care: A Systematic Review.

Poor pregnancy outcomes affect a child's lifelong health and disadvantaged populations are at higher risk of poor pregnancy outcomes. Preconception care aims to improve pregnancy outcomes by managing conditions and risks prior to conception. Given known inequities in pregnancy outcomes, the adoption of preconception care may benefit disadvantaged populations. Health economics plays an important role in the implementation of interventions, as economic evaluations seek to identify the most efficient and equitable care options. This review aimed to identify the cost-effectiveness of preconception care and how equity has been considered in these evaluations. A systematic review of literature published between 2012-2022 was undertaken to identify studies that evaluate the economic outcomes of preconception care. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were manually searched for consideration of equity in the economic evaluation analysis. Costs were presented and a narrative synthesis of studies reporting on outcomes of equity was conducted. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, and only two reported on aspects of equity, specifically ethnicity. Considering the significant disparities in pregnancy outcomes among disadvantaged populations, aspects of equity are important to consider when implementing and evaluating preconception interventions. Therefore, it is recommended that future research focuses on the cost-effectiveness of preconception care and that these evaluations incorporate aspects of equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in reproductive medicine
Seminars in reproductive medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Reproductive Medicine is a bi-monthly topic driven review journal that provides in-depth coverage of important advances in the understanding of normal and disordered human reproductive function, as well as new diagnostic and interventional techniques. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine offers an informed perspective on issues like male and female infertility, reproductive physiology, pharmacological hormonal manipulation, and state-of-the-art assisted reproductive technologies.
期刊最新文献
Current Ovulation and Luteal Phase Tracking Methods and Technologies for Fertility and Family Planning: A Review. Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Online Oocyte Cryopreservation Calculators. Role of Anti-Müllerian Hormone in the Central Regulation of Fertility Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Polygenetic Conditions: A Legal, Ethical, and Scientific Challenge. Utility of Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone Measurement as Part of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1