中国非小细胞肺癌患者循环肿瘤DNA与组织DNA体细胞突变的比较。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY International Journal of Biological Markers Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-06 DOI:10.1177/03936155221099036
Meng Zhang, Yi Feng, Changda Qu, Meizhu Meng, Wenmei Li, Meiying Ye, Sisi Li, Shaolei Li, Yuanyuan Ma, Nan Wu, Shuqin Jia
{"title":"中国非小细胞肺癌患者循环肿瘤DNA与组织DNA体细胞突变的比较。","authors":"Meng Zhang,&nbsp;Yi Feng,&nbsp;Changda Qu,&nbsp;Meizhu Meng,&nbsp;Wenmei Li,&nbsp;Meiying Ye,&nbsp;Sisi Li,&nbsp;Shaolei Li,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Ma,&nbsp;Nan Wu,&nbsp;Shuqin Jia","doi":"10.1177/03936155221099036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-invasive liquid biopsies of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a rapidly growing field in the research of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, factors affecting the concordance of mutations in paired plasma and tissue and the detection rate of ctDNA in real-world Chinese patients with NSCLC were identified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Peripheral blood and paired formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples from 125 NSCLC patients were collected and analyzed by sequencing 15 genes. Serological biomarkers were tested by immunoassay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall concordance between tumor and plasma samples and the detection rate of somatic mutations in ctDNA was 69.2% and 78.4%, respectively. The concordance and detection rate raised with clinical stage were stage I: 14.3%, 14.3%; stage II: 53.3%, 60.0%; stage III: 71.4%, 78.1%; stage IV: 74.1%, 85.2%. With increased tumor diameter, the concordance and detection rate raised from 33.33% to 71.64% and 33.33% to 80.8%, respectively. For patients with partial response, stable disease, progressive disease, and who were treatment-naïve, the concordance and detection rates were 0.0%, 62.7%, 75.2, 73.6%, and 16.7%, 61.9%, 83.3%, 86.5%, respectively. Serological markers: CEA, CA125, NSE, and CYFRA21-1 were significantly higher for patients with detectable somatic alterations in ctDNA than in those who were ctDNA negative (17.08 ng/mL vs. 3.95 ng/mL, 21.63 U/mL vs. 18.27 U/mL, 17.68 U/mL vs. 14.14 U/mL, and 6.55 U/mL vs. 3.81 U/mL, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced-stage, treatment naïve or poor therapy outcome, and large tumor size were associated with a high concordance and detection rate. Patients with detectable mutations in ctDNA had a higher level of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA125, NSE, and CYFRA21-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":50334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biological Markers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the somatic mutations between circulating tumor DNA and tissue DNA in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Meng Zhang,&nbsp;Yi Feng,&nbsp;Changda Qu,&nbsp;Meizhu Meng,&nbsp;Wenmei Li,&nbsp;Meiying Ye,&nbsp;Sisi Li,&nbsp;Shaolei Li,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Ma,&nbsp;Nan Wu,&nbsp;Shuqin Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03936155221099036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-invasive liquid biopsies of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a rapidly growing field in the research of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, factors affecting the concordance of mutations in paired plasma and tissue and the detection rate of ctDNA in real-world Chinese patients with NSCLC were identified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Peripheral blood and paired formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples from 125 NSCLC patients were collected and analyzed by sequencing 15 genes. Serological biomarkers were tested by immunoassay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall concordance between tumor and plasma samples and the detection rate of somatic mutations in ctDNA was 69.2% and 78.4%, respectively. The concordance and detection rate raised with clinical stage were stage I: 14.3%, 14.3%; stage II: 53.3%, 60.0%; stage III: 71.4%, 78.1%; stage IV: 74.1%, 85.2%. With increased tumor diameter, the concordance and detection rate raised from 33.33% to 71.64% and 33.33% to 80.8%, respectively. For patients with partial response, stable disease, progressive disease, and who were treatment-naïve, the concordance and detection rates were 0.0%, 62.7%, 75.2, 73.6%, and 16.7%, 61.9%, 83.3%, 86.5%, respectively. Serological markers: CEA, CA125, NSE, and CYFRA21-1 were significantly higher for patients with detectable somatic alterations in ctDNA than in those who were ctDNA negative (17.08 ng/mL vs. 3.95 ng/mL, 21.63 U/mL vs. 18.27 U/mL, 17.68 U/mL vs. 14.14 U/mL, and 6.55 U/mL vs. 3.81 U/mL, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced-stage, treatment naïve or poor therapy outcome, and large tumor size were associated with a high concordance and detection rate. Patients with detectable mutations in ctDNA had a higher level of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA125, NSE, and CYFRA21-1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biological Markers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biological Markers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03936155221099036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biological Markers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03936155221099036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)的无创液体活检在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的研究中是一个快速发展的领域。本研究确定了影响中国现实NSCLC患者配对血浆和组织中突变一致性及ctDNA检出率的因素。方法:收集125例非小细胞肺癌患者外周血及配对福尔马林固定石蜡包埋肿瘤组织标本,对15个基因进行测序分析。采用免疫分析法检测血清学生物标志物。结果:肿瘤与血浆样本总体一致性及ctDNA体细胞突变检出率分别为69.2%和78.4%。随着临床分期的增高,符合率和检出率分别为:ⅰ期:14.3%、14.3%;II期:53.3%,60.0%;III期:71.4%,78.1%;第四阶段:74.1%,85.2%。随着肿瘤直径的增大,一致性和检出率分别由33.33%和33.33%提高到71.64%和80.8%。对于部分缓解、病情稳定、病情进展和treatment-naïve患者,一致性和检出率分别为0.0%、62.7%、75.2、73.6%和16.7%、61.9%、83.3%、86.5%。血清标志物:CEA、CA125、NSE和CYFRA21-1在ctDNA检测到体细胞改变的患者中显著高于ctDNA阴性患者(分别为17.08 ng/mL vs. 3.95 ng/mL, 21.63 U/mL vs. 18.27 U/mL, 17.68 U/mL vs. 14.14 U/mL, 6.55 U/mL vs. 3.81 U/mL)。结论:晚期、治疗naïve或治疗效果较差、肿瘤大小较大与高一致性和检出率相关。检测到ctDNA突变的患者癌胚抗原、CA125、NSE和CYFRA21-1水平较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the somatic mutations between circulating tumor DNA and tissue DNA in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Non-invasive liquid biopsies of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a rapidly growing field in the research of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, factors affecting the concordance of mutations in paired plasma and tissue and the detection rate of ctDNA in real-world Chinese patients with NSCLC were identified.

Methods: Peripheral blood and paired formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples from 125 NSCLC patients were collected and analyzed by sequencing 15 genes. Serological biomarkers were tested by immunoassay.

Results: The overall concordance between tumor and plasma samples and the detection rate of somatic mutations in ctDNA was 69.2% and 78.4%, respectively. The concordance and detection rate raised with clinical stage were stage I: 14.3%, 14.3%; stage II: 53.3%, 60.0%; stage III: 71.4%, 78.1%; stage IV: 74.1%, 85.2%. With increased tumor diameter, the concordance and detection rate raised from 33.33% to 71.64% and 33.33% to 80.8%, respectively. For patients with partial response, stable disease, progressive disease, and who were treatment-naïve, the concordance and detection rates were 0.0%, 62.7%, 75.2, 73.6%, and 16.7%, 61.9%, 83.3%, 86.5%, respectively. Serological markers: CEA, CA125, NSE, and CYFRA21-1 were significantly higher for patients with detectable somatic alterations in ctDNA than in those who were ctDNA negative (17.08 ng/mL vs. 3.95 ng/mL, 21.63 U/mL vs. 18.27 U/mL, 17.68 U/mL vs. 14.14 U/mL, and 6.55 U/mL vs. 3.81 U/mL, respectively).

Conclusion: Advanced-stage, treatment naïve or poor therapy outcome, and large tumor size were associated with a high concordance and detection rate. Patients with detectable mutations in ctDNA had a higher level of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA125, NSE, and CYFRA21-1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Biological Markers
International Journal of Biological Markers 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: IJBM is an international, online only, peer-reviewed Journal, which publishes original research and critical reviews primarily focused on cancer biomarkers. IJBM targets advanced topics regarding the application of biomarkers in oncology and is dedicated to solid tumors in adult subjects. The clinical scenarios of interests are screening and early diagnosis of cancer, prognostic assessment, prediction of the response to and monitoring of treatment.
期刊最新文献
CircLPHN3 correlates with prognosis in colorectal cancer and regulates cellular processes by targeting miR-142-5p. Prognostic value of miR-190a-5p in renal cell cancer and its regulatory effect on tumor progression. Circulating exosomal miRNA-451 as an effective diagnostic biomarker and prognostic indicator for multiple myeloma. Inflammatory markers related to survival in breast cancer patients: Peru. Alteration of lncRNA RHPN1-AS1 predicts clinical prognosis and regulates the progression of bladder cancer via modulating miR-485-5p.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1