探讨家长对烧伤儿童多中心队列研究的态度:一项定性访谈研究。

Scars, burns & healing Pub Date : 2022-06-30 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20595131221098526
Philippa Tollow, Nicola Marie Stock, Diana Harcourt
{"title":"探讨家长对烧伤儿童多中心队列研究的态度:一项定性访谈研究。","authors":"Philippa Tollow,&nbsp;Nicola Marie Stock,&nbsp;Diana Harcourt","doi":"10.1177/20595131221098526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burn injuries affect more than 60,000 children every year in the UK, with many experiencing scarring as a result. Scarring can be highly variable, and research is required to explore the factors that may influence variability, as well as the psychosocial impact of these injuries on children and their caregivers. A multicentre burns cohort study is being planned to investigate genetic determinants of scarring and long-term psychosocial outcomes. Public involvement (PI) is an essential element of the design and feasibility stages of this planning. As part of this work, this study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of parents' attitudes towards participation in burns research, specifically a longitudinal cohort study of children with small burns (<10% total body surface area [TBSA]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 16 parents of children with burns took part in semi-structured interviews regarding their experiences of taking part in research and their attitudes towards the potential future cohort study. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified: 'Acknowledging trauma'; 'Aligning research with experience'; 'Research as a reciprocal relationship'; and 'Contributing to change'.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These four themes represent factors that parents suggested were important for acceptability, relevance, recruitment and retention of participants into a longitudinal multicentre cohort study of children with a burn injury and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study will be incorporated into the design of such a study, as well as having wide reaching relevance for research in the field of paediatric burn injuries.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong><i>Background to this subject</i> More than 60,000 children experience a burn injury every year in the UK and many of these injuries lead to scarring. We know that the extent of this scarring can vary, and we know that some children and their parents/caregivers manage well but others struggle with the challenges they face after having a burn. Researchers would like to carry out research on these topics, including asking participants to take part in research over several years to find out how genetics might influence scarring, as well as their psychological experiences over this time. Before they conduct this study, it is very important that researchers understand parents' attitudes towards this kind of research. The current study aimed to find out parents' opinions and ask what issues were important to them when taking part in burns research. <i>Details of how the work was conducted</i> Parents of children who had experienced a scald (a type of burn injury) were asked to take part in a research interview. In total, 16 parents took part in this study. We recorded these interviews and analysed them, looking for patterns and shared experiences in participants' interviews. <i>What we did and did not learn from this study</i> We found four themes in the interview data: 'Acknowledging trauma', 'Aligning research with experience', 'Research as a reciprocal relationship', and 'Contributing to change'. Overall, these themes suggest that parents were mostly supportive of a 'burns cohort study', but they have also highlighted some important considerations for this research and other future burns research studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9253984/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring parents' attitudes towards a multicentre cohort study of children with burns injuries: A qualitative interview study.\",\"authors\":\"Philippa Tollow,&nbsp;Nicola Marie Stock,&nbsp;Diana Harcourt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20595131221098526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burn injuries affect more than 60,000 children every year in the UK, with many experiencing scarring as a result. Scarring can be highly variable, and research is required to explore the factors that may influence variability, as well as the psychosocial impact of these injuries on children and their caregivers. A multicentre burns cohort study is being planned to investigate genetic determinants of scarring and long-term psychosocial outcomes. Public involvement (PI) is an essential element of the design and feasibility stages of this planning. As part of this work, this study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of parents' attitudes towards participation in burns research, specifically a longitudinal cohort study of children with small burns (<10% total body surface area [TBSA]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 16 parents of children with burns took part in semi-structured interviews regarding their experiences of taking part in research and their attitudes towards the potential future cohort study. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified: 'Acknowledging trauma'; 'Aligning research with experience'; 'Research as a reciprocal relationship'; and 'Contributing to change'.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These four themes represent factors that parents suggested were important for acceptability, relevance, recruitment and retention of participants into a longitudinal multicentre cohort study of children with a burn injury and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study will be incorporated into the design of such a study, as well as having wide reaching relevance for research in the field of paediatric burn injuries.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong><i>Background to this subject</i> More than 60,000 children experience a burn injury every year in the UK and many of these injuries lead to scarring. We know that the extent of this scarring can vary, and we know that some children and their parents/caregivers manage well but others struggle with the challenges they face after having a burn. Researchers would like to carry out research on these topics, including asking participants to take part in research over several years to find out how genetics might influence scarring, as well as their psychological experiences over this time. Before they conduct this study, it is very important that researchers understand parents' attitudes towards this kind of research. The current study aimed to find out parents' opinions and ask what issues were important to them when taking part in burns research. <i>Details of how the work was conducted</i> Parents of children who had experienced a scald (a type of burn injury) were asked to take part in a research interview. In total, 16 parents took part in this study. We recorded these interviews and analysed them, looking for patterns and shared experiences in participants' interviews. <i>What we did and did not learn from this study</i> We found four themes in the interview data: 'Acknowledging trauma', 'Aligning research with experience', 'Research as a reciprocal relationship', and 'Contributing to change'. Overall, these themes suggest that parents were mostly supportive of a 'burns cohort study', but they have also highlighted some important considerations for this research and other future burns research studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9253984/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20595131221098526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20595131221098526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:在英国,每年有超过6万名儿童受到烧伤的影响,其中许多人因此留下了疤痕。疤痕可能是高度可变的,需要进行研究,以探索可能影响变异的因素,以及这些伤害对儿童及其照顾者的心理社会影响。一项多中心烧伤队列研究正在计划调查疤痕和长期社会心理结果的遗传决定因素。公众参与是这一规划的设计和可行性阶段的基本要素。作为这项工作的一部分,本研究旨在深入了解父母对参与烧伤研究的态度,特别是对小烧伤儿童进行纵向队列研究(方法:总共有16名烧伤儿童的父母参与了半结构化访谈,了解他们参与研究的经历以及他们对未来潜在的队列研究的态度。访谈录音,逐字转录,并使用反身性主题分析进行分析。结果:确定了四个主题:“承认创伤”;“将研究与经验结合起来”;“研究是一种互惠关系”;以及“为改变做出贡献”。讨论:这四个主题代表了家长认为对烧伤儿童及其护理人员的纵向多中心队列研究的可接受性、相关性、招募和保留参与者很重要的因素。结论:本研究结果将被纳入此类研究的设计中,并对儿科烧伤领域的研究具有广泛的相关性。概要:本课题背景:在英国,每年有超过6万名儿童遭受烧伤,其中许多烧伤会导致疤痕。我们知道这种疤痕的程度是不同的,我们知道一些孩子和他们的父母/照顾者处理得很好,但另一些孩子在烧伤后面临着挑战。研究人员希望对这些主题进行研究,包括要求参与者参加几年的研究,以找出基因如何影响疤痕,以及他们在这段时间内的心理经历。在进行这项研究之前,研究人员了解家长对这种研究的态度是非常重要的。目前的研究旨在了解父母的意见,并询问他们在参与烧伤研究时哪些问题对他们来说是重要的。有过烫伤(一种烧伤)经历的孩子的父母被要求参加一个研究访谈。总共有16位家长参与了这项研究。我们将这些访谈记录下来并进行分析,在参与者的访谈中寻找模式和共同经验。我们在访谈数据中发现了四个主题:“承认创伤”、“将研究与经验结合起来”、“研究作为一种互惠关系”和“为改变做出贡献”。总的来说,这些主题表明父母大多支持“烧伤队列研究”,但他们也强调了本研究和其他未来烧伤研究的一些重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring parents' attitudes towards a multicentre cohort study of children with burns injuries: A qualitative interview study.

Background: Burn injuries affect more than 60,000 children every year in the UK, with many experiencing scarring as a result. Scarring can be highly variable, and research is required to explore the factors that may influence variability, as well as the psychosocial impact of these injuries on children and their caregivers. A multicentre burns cohort study is being planned to investigate genetic determinants of scarring and long-term psychosocial outcomes. Public involvement (PI) is an essential element of the design and feasibility stages of this planning. As part of this work, this study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of parents' attitudes towards participation in burns research, specifically a longitudinal cohort study of children with small burns (<10% total body surface area [TBSA]).

Methods: In total, 16 parents of children with burns took part in semi-structured interviews regarding their experiences of taking part in research and their attitudes towards the potential future cohort study. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.

Results: Four themes were identified: 'Acknowledging trauma'; 'Aligning research with experience'; 'Research as a reciprocal relationship'; and 'Contributing to change'.

Discussion: These four themes represent factors that parents suggested were important for acceptability, relevance, recruitment and retention of participants into a longitudinal multicentre cohort study of children with a burn injury and their caregivers.

Conclusion: The findings of this study will be incorporated into the design of such a study, as well as having wide reaching relevance for research in the field of paediatric burn injuries.

Lay summary: Background to this subject More than 60,000 children experience a burn injury every year in the UK and many of these injuries lead to scarring. We know that the extent of this scarring can vary, and we know that some children and their parents/caregivers manage well but others struggle with the challenges they face after having a burn. Researchers would like to carry out research on these topics, including asking participants to take part in research over several years to find out how genetics might influence scarring, as well as their psychological experiences over this time. Before they conduct this study, it is very important that researchers understand parents' attitudes towards this kind of research. The current study aimed to find out parents' opinions and ask what issues were important to them when taking part in burns research. Details of how the work was conducted Parents of children who had experienced a scald (a type of burn injury) were asked to take part in a research interview. In total, 16 parents took part in this study. We recorded these interviews and analysed them, looking for patterns and shared experiences in participants' interviews. What we did and did not learn from this study We found four themes in the interview data: 'Acknowledging trauma', 'Aligning research with experience', 'Research as a reciprocal relationship', and 'Contributing to change'. Overall, these themes suggest that parents were mostly supportive of a 'burns cohort study', but they have also highlighted some important considerations for this research and other future burns research studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of oral Calendula officinalis on second-degree burn wound healing. To bleed or not to bleed? Case series and discussion of haemorrhage risk with enzymatic debridement in burn injuries. An evaluation of clinical psychology input into burns multidisciplinary follow-up clinics. The efficacy of combined ultrasound and electric field stimulation therapy in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1