运用EPAs评价医学生临床经验。

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2022-05-20 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2022.873914
Cameron Bosinski, Marissa Rice, Matthew Mason, Lauren J Germain
{"title":"运用EPAs评价医学生临床经验。","authors":"Cameron Bosinski,&nbsp;Marissa Rice,&nbsp;Matthew Mason,&nbsp;Lauren J Germain","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2022.873914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although there are standardized assessments of medical students throughout medical school, the clinical experience of each student may vary widely. Currently, medical schools do not have a systematic method to ensure that students perform clinical skills during clinical clerkships. Our study used the Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency (EPAs) framework to assess the ways in which medical students meaningfully participate in patient care at various clinical sites in each required clerkship and over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over the 2020-2021 academic year, 170 third-year medical students were asked to report the number of times they performed EPA-1 (gather history and perform physical examination), EPA-5 (document clinical encounter), and EPA-6 (provide oral presentation of clinical encounter) at the end of each required clinical rotation (emergency medicine, internal medicine, surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, pediatrics, neurology, psychiatry) at a single medical school. We used descriptive statistics and <i>t</i> tests to compare frequency of these EPAs by campus type, site type, clerkship, and time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand, two hundred sixty-one surveys met inclusion criteria. Students performed EPA-5 more often at an academic medical center, and EPA-1 more frequently in the outpatient setting. Students performed EPA-1 and EPA-6 most often during emergency medicine and EPA-5 most often during internal medicine. Performance of all three EPAs increased over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This reporting system produced a robust data set that allowed for EPA performance comparisons by campus, site type, clerkship, and time. EPA performance varied by rotation, site type, clerkship, and time.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":" ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9256297/pdf/primer-6-13.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the EPAs to Evaluate the Clinical Experience of Medical Students.\",\"authors\":\"Cameron Bosinski,&nbsp;Marissa Rice,&nbsp;Matthew Mason,&nbsp;Lauren J Germain\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/PRiMER.2022.873914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although there are standardized assessments of medical students throughout medical school, the clinical experience of each student may vary widely. Currently, medical schools do not have a systematic method to ensure that students perform clinical skills during clinical clerkships. Our study used the Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency (EPAs) framework to assess the ways in which medical students meaningfully participate in patient care at various clinical sites in each required clerkship and over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over the 2020-2021 academic year, 170 third-year medical students were asked to report the number of times they performed EPA-1 (gather history and perform physical examination), EPA-5 (document clinical encounter), and EPA-6 (provide oral presentation of clinical encounter) at the end of each required clinical rotation (emergency medicine, internal medicine, surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, pediatrics, neurology, psychiatry) at a single medical school. We used descriptive statistics and <i>t</i> tests to compare frequency of these EPAs by campus type, site type, clerkship, and time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand, two hundred sixty-one surveys met inclusion criteria. Students performed EPA-5 more often at an academic medical center, and EPA-1 more frequently in the outpatient setting. Students performed EPA-1 and EPA-6 most often during emergency medicine and EPA-5 most often during internal medicine. Performance of all three EPAs increased over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This reporting system produced a robust data set that allowed for EPA performance comparisons by campus, site type, clerkship, and time. EPA performance varied by rotation, site type, clerkship, and time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9256297/pdf/primer-6-13.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2022.873914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2022.873914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:虽然在整个医学院对医学生有标准化的评估,但每个学生的临床经验可能差别很大。目前,医学院没有一个系统的方法来确保学生在临床实习期间发挥临床技能。我们的研究使用了进入住院医师的可信赖的专业活动(EPAs)框架来评估医学生在各种临床场所有意义地参与患者护理的方式,每种需要的实习和时间。方法:在2020-2021学年,170名三年级医学生被要求报告他们在每个必要的临床轮转(急诊医学、内科、外科、产科/妇科、儿科、神经病学、精神病学)结束时进行EPA-1(收集病史并进行体格检查)、EPA-5(记录临床就诊)和EPA-6(提供临床就诊口头报告)的次数。我们使用描述性统计和t检验来比较校园类型、场地类型、职员人数和时间等环境保护活动的频率。结果:10261份调查符合纳入标准。学生在学术医疗中心更常进行EPA-5,而在门诊环境中更常进行EPA-1。学生在急诊科最常进行EPA-1和EPA-6,在内科最常进行EPA-5。随着时间的推移,所有三个epa的性能都有所提高。结论:该报告系统产生了一个强大的数据集,允许按校园,站点类型,职员和时间进行EPA绩效比较。EPA的表现因轮换、场地类型、职员和时间而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using the EPAs to Evaluate the Clinical Experience of Medical Students.

Introduction: Although there are standardized assessments of medical students throughout medical school, the clinical experience of each student may vary widely. Currently, medical schools do not have a systematic method to ensure that students perform clinical skills during clinical clerkships. Our study used the Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency (EPAs) framework to assess the ways in which medical students meaningfully participate in patient care at various clinical sites in each required clerkship and over time.

Methods: Over the 2020-2021 academic year, 170 third-year medical students were asked to report the number of times they performed EPA-1 (gather history and perform physical examination), EPA-5 (document clinical encounter), and EPA-6 (provide oral presentation of clinical encounter) at the end of each required clinical rotation (emergency medicine, internal medicine, surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, pediatrics, neurology, psychiatry) at a single medical school. We used descriptive statistics and t tests to compare frequency of these EPAs by campus type, site type, clerkship, and time.

Results: One thousand, two hundred sixty-one surveys met inclusion criteria. Students performed EPA-5 more often at an academic medical center, and EPA-1 more frequently in the outpatient setting. Students performed EPA-1 and EPA-6 most often during emergency medicine and EPA-5 most often during internal medicine. Performance of all three EPAs increased over time.

Conclusion: This reporting system produced a robust data set that allowed for EPA performance comparisons by campus, site type, clerkship, and time. EPA performance varied by rotation, site type, clerkship, and time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Starting the Conversation: Patient Perceptions of Self-Assessed Type-2 Diabetes Risk. Use of AI in Family Medicine Publications: A Joint Editorial From Journal Editors. Beyond the Workshop: Advancing Antiracist Medical Education. Contextualizing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the Broader Vaccination Debate. Integrating Bias Reduction Into Medical Teaching Cases: Addressing the Overrepresentation of Skin of Color Images in Infectious Disease and Sexually Transmitted Infection Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1