国际协调理事会(ICH)生物仿制药批准指南提案。

Q2 Medicine Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2022-11-17 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20016689.2022.2147286
Sarfaraz K Niazi, Waleed Mohammed Al-Shaqha, Zafar Mirza
{"title":"国际协调理事会(ICH)生物仿制药批准指南提案。","authors":"Sarfaraz K Niazi,&nbsp;Waleed Mohammed Al-Shaqha,&nbsp;Zafar Mirza","doi":"10.1080/20016689.2022.2147286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since the initial release of biosimilars 18 years ago, regulations for their licensing have changed considerably; however, there is no global consensus on these regulations. Establishing harmonized regulatory guidelines for the approval of biosimilars with support from the ICH, an independent, non-profit association under Swiss law, will significantly enhance the affordability of biological drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Regulatory guidelines from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and World Health Organization (WHO) were analyzed for historical changes and elements critical to the safety and efficacy of biosimilars.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of all EMA and FDA filings show that none of the animal testing and clinical efficacy testing failed because animals do not have the required receptors to initiate pharmacologic responses, and efficacy studies cannot be statistically powered to conclude any results. New analytical technologies will enable good biosimilarity determination, avoiding both tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scientifically based ICH guidelines that remove redundant studies will reduce development costs, improve safety, and allow global drug distribution based on single compliance. These guidelines are particularly necessary for emerging countries lacking the expertise and resources to evaluate biosimilar filings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/61/1b/ZJMA_11_2147286.PMC9677983.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposal of International Council for Harmonization (ICH) Guideline for the Approval of Biosimilars.\",\"authors\":\"Sarfaraz K Niazi,&nbsp;Waleed Mohammed Al-Shaqha,&nbsp;Zafar Mirza\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20016689.2022.2147286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since the initial release of biosimilars 18 years ago, regulations for their licensing have changed considerably; however, there is no global consensus on these regulations. Establishing harmonized regulatory guidelines for the approval of biosimilars with support from the ICH, an independent, non-profit association under Swiss law, will significantly enhance the affordability of biological drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Regulatory guidelines from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and World Health Organization (WHO) were analyzed for historical changes and elements critical to the safety and efficacy of biosimilars.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of all EMA and FDA filings show that none of the animal testing and clinical efficacy testing failed because animals do not have the required receptors to initiate pharmacologic responses, and efficacy studies cannot be statistically powered to conclude any results. New analytical technologies will enable good biosimilarity determination, avoiding both tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scientifically based ICH guidelines that remove redundant studies will reduce development costs, improve safety, and allow global drug distribution based on single compliance. These guidelines are particularly necessary for emerging countries lacking the expertise and resources to evaluate biosimilar filings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/61/1b/ZJMA_11_2147286.PMC9677983.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2022.2147286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2022.2147286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目标:自18年前生物仿制药首次发布以来,其许可法规发生了很大变化;然而,对这些规定并没有达成全球共识。ICH是根据瑞士法律成立的一个独立的非营利性协会,在ICH的支持下,为生物仿制药的批准制定统一的监管指南,将大大提高生物药物的可负担性。方法:分析美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)、欧洲药品管理局(EMA)、药品和保健产品监管局(MHRA)和世界卫生组织(WHO)的监管指南,以了解影响生物仿制药安全性和有效性的历史变化和关键因素。结果:对所有EMA和FDA文件的分析表明,没有动物试验和临床疗效试验失败,因为动物不具有启动药理反应所需的受体,并且疗效研究无法在统计上得出任何结果。新的分析技术将实现良好的生物相似性测定,避免这两种测试。结论:基于科学的ICH指南删除了多余的研究,将降低开发成本,提高安全性,并允许基于单一依从性的全球药物分销。这些指南对于缺乏专业知识和资源来评估生物仿制药申请的新兴国家尤其必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proposal of International Council for Harmonization (ICH) Guideline for the Approval of Biosimilars.

Objectives: Since the initial release of biosimilars 18 years ago, regulations for their licensing have changed considerably; however, there is no global consensus on these regulations. Establishing harmonized regulatory guidelines for the approval of biosimilars with support from the ICH, an independent, non-profit association under Swiss law, will significantly enhance the affordability of biological drugs.

Methods: Regulatory guidelines from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and World Health Organization (WHO) were analyzed for historical changes and elements critical to the safety and efficacy of biosimilars.

Results: Analysis of all EMA and FDA filings show that none of the animal testing and clinical efficacy testing failed because animals do not have the required receptors to initiate pharmacologic responses, and efficacy studies cannot be statistically powered to conclude any results. New analytical technologies will enable good biosimilarity determination, avoiding both tests.

Conclusion: Scientifically based ICH guidelines that remove redundant studies will reduce development costs, improve safety, and allow global drug distribution based on single compliance. These guidelines are particularly necessary for emerging countries lacking the expertise and resources to evaluate biosimilar filings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Knowledge and Application of Economics in Healthcare in a High-Income Country Today: The Case of Belgium. Non-Medical Switching or Discontinuation Patterns among Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the United States: A Claims-Based Analysis. Proposal of a Knowledge Management Model for Complex Systems: Case of the Supervision and Control Subsystem of the Colombian Health System. Adoption of a Societal Perspective in Economic Evaluations of Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Conceptual Paper. Patient Experience and Satisfaction with Orthopedic Services at a Community (Rural) Setting Hospital-How Is It Different from Urban Setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1