Nicholas R Taweel, Dawn T Gulick, Kerstin M Palombaro
{"title":"用新型关节测量仪评估外侧踝关节扭伤","authors":"Nicholas R Taweel, Dawn T Gulick, Kerstin M Palombaro","doi":"10.1177/19386400221125851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral ankle sprains are a common musculoskeletal injury across a variety of activities. Researchers have sought to identify a method to objectively assess joint laxity with a device that is simple to use and affordable.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the use of an ankle arthrometer on individuals with ankle sprains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participant was evaluated by the physician and the degree of ankle sprain was identified. In the prone position, the arthrometer was used to perform an anterior drawer test (uninjured before injured, 3 measures each). Both clinicians were blinded to the data of the other.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 30 participants, 10 in each group (uninjured, grade 1 sprain, grade 2 sprain). Mann-Whitney U testing found significant differences between the control and grade I ankle sprain groups (P < .001), the control and grade II ankle sprain groups (P < .001), and the grade I and grade II ankle sprain groups (P = .004). There was ±0.31-mm difference in anterior translation between healthy ankles, whereas there was 1.11- and 2.16-mm difference between ankles in grade 1 and grade 2 sprains, respectively.</p><p><strong>Clinical application: </strong>Despite the manual anterior drawer test being convenient, the subjectivity makes it unreliable. This study is consistent with prior literature about the difference in translation (millimeters) between the uninjured and injured ankles corresponding to the magnitude of ankle laxity. This study also contributes to the evolving evidence to support the relationship of a ratio of measures (injured/uninjured) as an objective measure of laxity. These comparisons to the individual's healthy ankle mitigate the variability of the normative values. The use of an arthrometer to assess ankle joint laxity enhances the objectivity of patient assessment throughout the recovery process.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"235-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Lateral Ankle Sprains With a New Arthrometer.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas R Taweel, Dawn T Gulick, Kerstin M Palombaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19386400221125851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral ankle sprains are a common musculoskeletal injury across a variety of activities. Researchers have sought to identify a method to objectively assess joint laxity with a device that is simple to use and affordable.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the use of an ankle arthrometer on individuals with ankle sprains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participant was evaluated by the physician and the degree of ankle sprain was identified. In the prone position, the arthrometer was used to perform an anterior drawer test (uninjured before injured, 3 measures each). Both clinicians were blinded to the data of the other.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 30 participants, 10 in each group (uninjured, grade 1 sprain, grade 2 sprain). Mann-Whitney U testing found significant differences between the control and grade I ankle sprain groups (P < .001), the control and grade II ankle sprain groups (P < .001), and the grade I and grade II ankle sprain groups (P = .004). There was ±0.31-mm difference in anterior translation between healthy ankles, whereas there was 1.11- and 2.16-mm difference between ankles in grade 1 and grade 2 sprains, respectively.</p><p><strong>Clinical application: </strong>Despite the manual anterior drawer test being convenient, the subjectivity makes it unreliable. This study is consistent with prior literature about the difference in translation (millimeters) between the uninjured and injured ankles corresponding to the magnitude of ankle laxity. This study also contributes to the evolving evidence to support the relationship of a ratio of measures (injured/uninjured) as an objective measure of laxity. These comparisons to the individual's healthy ankle mitigate the variability of the normative values. The use of an arthrometer to assess ankle joint laxity enhances the objectivity of patient assessment throughout the recovery process.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle specialist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"235-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle specialist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400221125851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400221125851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:踝关节外侧扭伤是各种活动中常见的肌肉骨骼损伤。研究人员一直在寻找一种方法来客观评估关节松弛程度,这种设备使用简单且价格适中。目的:本研究旨在评估踝关节测量仪在踝关节扭伤患者中的使用情况:方法:由医生对参与者进行评估,确定踝关节扭伤的程度。在俯卧位,使用关节计进行前抽屉测试(未受伤前和受伤前,各测量 3 次)。两名临床医生对另一方的数据均为盲人:共有 30 名参与者,每组 10 人(未受伤、1 级扭伤、2 级扭伤)。Mann-Whitney U 检验发现,对照组和 I 级踝关节扭伤组(P < .001)、对照组和 II 级踝关节扭伤组(P < .001)以及 I 级踝关节扭伤组和 II 级踝关节扭伤组(P = .004)之间存在显著差异。健康踝关节的前移量相差±0.31毫米,而一级和二级扭伤踝关节的前移量分别相差1.11毫米和2.16毫米:临床应用:尽管手动前抽屉测试很方便,但其主观性使其并不可靠。这项研究与之前关于未受伤和受伤踝关节之间的平移差异(毫米)与踝关节松弛程度相对应的文献一致。这项研究还为支持将测量比率(受伤/未受伤)作为踝关节松弛度的客观测量方法的不断发展的证据做出了贡献。这些与个人健康踝关节的比较减轻了标准值的可变性。使用关节测量仪来评估踝关节松弛程度可提高患者在整个康复过程中评估的客观性:证据等级:III 级。
Assessing Lateral Ankle Sprains With a New Arthrometer.
Background: Lateral ankle sprains are a common musculoskeletal injury across a variety of activities. Researchers have sought to identify a method to objectively assess joint laxity with a device that is simple to use and affordable.
Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the use of an ankle arthrometer on individuals with ankle sprains.
Methods: The participant was evaluated by the physician and the degree of ankle sprain was identified. In the prone position, the arthrometer was used to perform an anterior drawer test (uninjured before injured, 3 measures each). Both clinicians were blinded to the data of the other.
Results: There were 30 participants, 10 in each group (uninjured, grade 1 sprain, grade 2 sprain). Mann-Whitney U testing found significant differences between the control and grade I ankle sprain groups (P < .001), the control and grade II ankle sprain groups (P < .001), and the grade I and grade II ankle sprain groups (P = .004). There was ±0.31-mm difference in anterior translation between healthy ankles, whereas there was 1.11- and 2.16-mm difference between ankles in grade 1 and grade 2 sprains, respectively.
Clinical application: Despite the manual anterior drawer test being convenient, the subjectivity makes it unreliable. This study is consistent with prior literature about the difference in translation (millimeters) between the uninjured and injured ankles corresponding to the magnitude of ankle laxity. This study also contributes to the evolving evidence to support the relationship of a ratio of measures (injured/uninjured) as an objective measure of laxity. These comparisons to the individual's healthy ankle mitigate the variability of the normative values. The use of an arthrometer to assess ankle joint laxity enhances the objectivity of patient assessment throughout the recovery process.