重度抑郁障碍治疗反应的 QEEG 预测因素--印度西北部的一项重复研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical EEG and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-29 DOI:10.1177/15500594221142396
Akashdeep Singh, Priti Arun, Gurvinder Pal Singh, Damanjeet Kaur, Simranjit Kaur
{"title":"重度抑郁障碍治疗反应的 QEEG 预测因素--印度西北部的一项重复研究。","authors":"Akashdeep Singh, Priti Arun, Gurvinder Pal Singh, Damanjeet Kaur, Simranjit Kaur","doi":"10.1177/15500594221142396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Predicting treatment response with antidepressant is a challenging task for clinicians and researchers. An important limitation of an antidepressant trial is the increased time spent before an adequacy of trial can be decided. Quantitative Electroencephalography has shown some evidence in identifying early changes seen with antidepressants. No data has been reported from Indian population on its predictive capabilities. <b>Aim:</b> To examine whether early changes in frontal and prefrontal theta value in QEEG could predict antidepressant treatment response. <b>Methods:</b> Structured clinical assessments were conducted at baseline and after one week in a sample of treatment-seeking adults with major depressive disorder (n = 50). Patients were started on SSRI (Escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine or sertraline) and followed for 8 weeks. QEEG recordings were carried out at baseline and week 1 and its parameters (relative theta power and cordance) were assessed to identify its predictive value for treatment response. Treatment response was assessed using Hamilton depression rating scale with 50% reduction after 8 weeks being considered as response. <b>Results:</b> Mean age of the sample was 39 ± 10 years and majority of them were females (64%)<b>.</b> A significant reduction was found in relative frontal theta value (p = 0.021) from baseline to one week in responders. However, linear regression revealed that this change could not predict the treatment response (p = 0.37). <b>Conclusions:</b> QEEG changes are observed in initial phase of antidepressant treatment but these changes can't predict the treatment response.</p>","PeriodicalId":10682,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"QEEG Predictors of Treatment Response in Major Depressive Disorder- A Replication Study from Northwest India.\",\"authors\":\"Akashdeep Singh, Priti Arun, Gurvinder Pal Singh, Damanjeet Kaur, Simranjit Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15500594221142396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Predicting treatment response with antidepressant is a challenging task for clinicians and researchers. An important limitation of an antidepressant trial is the increased time spent before an adequacy of trial can be decided. Quantitative Electroencephalography has shown some evidence in identifying early changes seen with antidepressants. No data has been reported from Indian population on its predictive capabilities. <b>Aim:</b> To examine whether early changes in frontal and prefrontal theta value in QEEG could predict antidepressant treatment response. <b>Methods:</b> Structured clinical assessments were conducted at baseline and after one week in a sample of treatment-seeking adults with major depressive disorder (n = 50). Patients were started on SSRI (Escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine or sertraline) and followed for 8 weeks. QEEG recordings were carried out at baseline and week 1 and its parameters (relative theta power and cordance) were assessed to identify its predictive value for treatment response. Treatment response was assessed using Hamilton depression rating scale with 50% reduction after 8 weeks being considered as response. <b>Results:</b> Mean age of the sample was 39 ± 10 years and majority of them were females (64%)<b>.</b> A significant reduction was found in relative frontal theta value (p = 0.021) from baseline to one week in responders. However, linear regression revealed that this change could not predict the treatment response (p = 0.37). <b>Conclusions:</b> QEEG changes are observed in initial phase of antidepressant treatment but these changes can't predict the treatment response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594221142396\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594221142396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于临床医生和研究人员来说,预测抗抑郁药物的治疗反应是一项具有挑战性的任务。抗抑郁药试验的一个重要限制因素是,在确定试验是否充分之前需要花费更多的时间。定量脑电图已在识别抗抑郁药物的早期变化方面显示出一些证据。关于其预测能力,尚未有来自印度人群的数据报告。目的:研究定量脑电图中额叶和前额叶θ值的早期变化能否预测抗抑郁治疗反应。方法:在治疗前进行结构化临床评估:对寻求治疗的重度抑郁症成人样本(n = 50)进行基线和一周后的结构化临床评估。患者开始服用 SSRI(艾司西酞普兰、氟西汀、帕罗西汀或舍曲林),并随访 8 周。在基线和第一周进行 QEEG 记录,并评估其参数(相对 Theta 功率和 cordance),以确定其对治疗反应的预测价值。治疗反应采用汉密尔顿抑郁评分量表进行评估,8周后抑郁程度降低50%即为治疗反应。研究结果样本的平均年龄为 39 ± 10 岁,大部分为女性(64%)。研究发现,从基线到一周后,应答者的相对额叶θ值明显下降(p = 0.021)。然而,线性回归显示,这一变化并不能预测治疗反应(p = 0.37)。结论抗抑郁治疗初期可观察到 QEEG 变化,但这些变化无法预测治疗反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
QEEG Predictors of Treatment Response in Major Depressive Disorder- A Replication Study from Northwest India.

Background: Predicting treatment response with antidepressant is a challenging task for clinicians and researchers. An important limitation of an antidepressant trial is the increased time spent before an adequacy of trial can be decided. Quantitative Electroencephalography has shown some evidence in identifying early changes seen with antidepressants. No data has been reported from Indian population on its predictive capabilities. Aim: To examine whether early changes in frontal and prefrontal theta value in QEEG could predict antidepressant treatment response. Methods: Structured clinical assessments were conducted at baseline and after one week in a sample of treatment-seeking adults with major depressive disorder (n = 50). Patients were started on SSRI (Escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine or sertraline) and followed for 8 weeks. QEEG recordings were carried out at baseline and week 1 and its parameters (relative theta power and cordance) were assessed to identify its predictive value for treatment response. Treatment response was assessed using Hamilton depression rating scale with 50% reduction after 8 weeks being considered as response. Results: Mean age of the sample was 39 ± 10 years and majority of them were females (64%). A significant reduction was found in relative frontal theta value (p = 0.021) from baseline to one week in responders. However, linear regression revealed that this change could not predict the treatment response (p = 0.37). Conclusions: QEEG changes are observed in initial phase of antidepressant treatment but these changes can't predict the treatment response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical EEG and Neuroscience conveys clinically relevant research and development in electroencephalography and neuroscience. Original articles on any aspect of clinical neurophysiology or related work in allied fields are invited for publication.
期刊最新文献
Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Can Differentiate Treatment-Resistant and Responsive Depression Cases with High Accuracy Deep Brain Stimulator (DBS) Artifact in the EEG of a Pediatric Patient. Classification of BCI Multiclass Motor Imagery Task Based on Artificial Neural Network. Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Alters Auditory Steady-State Oscillatory Rhythms and Their Cross-Frequency Couplings. Comparison of Spectral Analysis of Gamma Band Activity During Actual and Imagined Movements as a Cognitive Tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1