灵活和刚性转录因子- dna对接的基准

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology BMC Structural Biology Pub Date : 2011-11-01 DOI:10.1186/1472-6807-11-45
RyangGuk Kim, Rosario I Corona, Bo Hong, Jun-tao Guo
{"title":"灵活和刚性转录因子- dna对接的基准","authors":"RyangGuk Kim,&nbsp;Rosario I Corona,&nbsp;Bo Hong,&nbsp;Jun-tao Guo","doi":"10.1186/1472-6807-11-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Structural insight from transcription factor-DNA (TF-DNA) complexes is of paramount importance to our understanding of the affinity and specificity of TF-DNA interaction, and to the development of structure-based prediction of TF binding sites. Yet the majority of the TF-DNA complexes remain unsolved despite the considerable experimental efforts being made. Computational docking represents a promising alternative to bridge the gap. To facilitate the study of TF-DNA docking, carefully designed benchmarks are needed for performance evaluation and identification of the strengths and weaknesses of docking algorithms.</p><p>We constructed two benchmarks for flexible and rigid TF-DNA docking respectively using a unified non-redundant set of 38 test cases. The test cases encompass diverse fold families and are classified into easy and hard groups with respect to the degrees of difficulty in TF-DNA docking. The major parameters used to classify expected docking difficulty in flexible docking are the conformational differences between bound and unbound TFs and the interaction strength between TFs and DNA. For rigid docking in which the starting structure is a bound TF conformation, only interaction strength is considered.</p><p>We believe these benchmarks are important for the development of better interaction potentials and TF-DNA docking algorithms, which bears important implications to structure-based prediction of transcription factor binding sites and drug design.</p>","PeriodicalId":51240,"journal":{"name":"BMC Structural Biology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6807-11-45","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarks for flexible and rigid transcription factor-DNA docking\",\"authors\":\"RyangGuk Kim,&nbsp;Rosario I Corona,&nbsp;Bo Hong,&nbsp;Jun-tao Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1472-6807-11-45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Structural insight from transcription factor-DNA (TF-DNA) complexes is of paramount importance to our understanding of the affinity and specificity of TF-DNA interaction, and to the development of structure-based prediction of TF binding sites. Yet the majority of the TF-DNA complexes remain unsolved despite the considerable experimental efforts being made. Computational docking represents a promising alternative to bridge the gap. To facilitate the study of TF-DNA docking, carefully designed benchmarks are needed for performance evaluation and identification of the strengths and weaknesses of docking algorithms.</p><p>We constructed two benchmarks for flexible and rigid TF-DNA docking respectively using a unified non-redundant set of 38 test cases. The test cases encompass diverse fold families and are classified into easy and hard groups with respect to the degrees of difficulty in TF-DNA docking. The major parameters used to classify expected docking difficulty in flexible docking are the conformational differences between bound and unbound TFs and the interaction strength between TFs and DNA. For rigid docking in which the starting structure is a bound TF conformation, only interaction strength is considered.</p><p>We believe these benchmarks are important for the development of better interaction potentials and TF-DNA docking algorithms, which bears important implications to structure-based prediction of transcription factor binding sites and drug design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Structural Biology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6807-11-45\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Structural Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1472-6807-11-45\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Structural Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1472-6807-11-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

转录因子- dna (TF- dna)复合物的结构洞察对于我们理解TF- dna相互作用的亲和力和特异性以及基于结构的TF结合位点预测的发展至关重要。然而,尽管进行了大量的实验努力,大多数TF-DNA复合物仍未得到解决。计算对接代表了一个有希望的替代方案,以弥合差距。为了便于对TF-DNA对接的研究,需要精心设计基准来评估对接算法的性能并识别其优缺点。我们使用38个统一的非冗余测试用例分别构建了柔性和刚性TF-DNA对接的两个基准。测试用例包含不同的折叠家族,并根据TF-DNA对接的困难程度分为容易组和困难组。柔性对接中对预期对接难度进行分类的主要参数是结合与未结合的tf之间的构象差异以及tf与DNA之间的相互作用强度。对于初始结构为有界TF构象的刚性对接,只考虑相互作用强度。我们相信这些基准对于开发更好的相互作用潜力和TF-DNA对接算法非常重要,这对基于结构的转录因子结合位点预测和药物设计具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmarks for flexible and rigid transcription factor-DNA docking

Structural insight from transcription factor-DNA (TF-DNA) complexes is of paramount importance to our understanding of the affinity and specificity of TF-DNA interaction, and to the development of structure-based prediction of TF binding sites. Yet the majority of the TF-DNA complexes remain unsolved despite the considerable experimental efforts being made. Computational docking represents a promising alternative to bridge the gap. To facilitate the study of TF-DNA docking, carefully designed benchmarks are needed for performance evaluation and identification of the strengths and weaknesses of docking algorithms.

We constructed two benchmarks for flexible and rigid TF-DNA docking respectively using a unified non-redundant set of 38 test cases. The test cases encompass diverse fold families and are classified into easy and hard groups with respect to the degrees of difficulty in TF-DNA docking. The major parameters used to classify expected docking difficulty in flexible docking are the conformational differences between bound and unbound TFs and the interaction strength between TFs and DNA. For rigid docking in which the starting structure is a bound TF conformation, only interaction strength is considered.

We believe these benchmarks are important for the development of better interaction potentials and TF-DNA docking algorithms, which bears important implications to structure-based prediction of transcription factor binding sites and drug design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Structural Biology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on investigations into the structure of biological macromolecules, including solving structures, structural and functional analyses, and computational modeling.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of putative proteins encoded by variable ORFs in white spot syndrome virus genome Correction to: Classification of the human THAP protein family identifies an evolutionarily conserved coiled coil region Effect of low complexity regions within the PvMSP3α block II on the tertiary structure of the protein and implications to immune escape mechanisms QRNAS: software tool for refinement of nucleic acid structures Classification of the human THAP protein family identifies an evolutionarily conserved coiled coil region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1