ABO血型与COVID-19死亡率的关系

IF 1.3 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Journal of hematology Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-27 DOI:10.14740/jh993
Hira Akhlaq, Parastou Tizro, Anita Aggarwal, Victor E Nava
{"title":"ABO血型与COVID-19死亡率的关系","authors":"Hira Akhlaq, Parastou Tizro, Anita Aggarwal, Victor E Nava","doi":"10.14740/jh993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We were intrigued by the conclusion of Kumar et al [1] that once patients are hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, blood type is not associated with severe disease or in-hospital mortality. During this global pandemic controversial data have been published on this topic. Initial studies suggested that the lethality risk was increased or decreased with blood type A and O, respectively [2]. However, subsequent multivariate analysis found no association between blood type and risk of intubation or death after COVID-19 infection [3]. Furthermore, a large study with more than 11,000 predominantly white race (83%) individuals concluded that ABO groups were not associated with disease susceptibility or severity and were unlikely to be useful predictors of COVID-19 severity in similar ancestries, raising the importance of extending these observations to more diverse populations [4]. Of interest, Apea et al recently demonstrated higher mortality in patients from Asian and black backgrounds during COVID-19 infection after controlling for obvious confounders and frailty [5]. In the Washington, DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, we are strategically situated to further investigate the outcomes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2) infection in blacks since they represent approximately 60% of our patients. After Institutional Review Board approval, we followed 201 patients requiring hospitalization due to COVID-19 infection during 7 consecutive months (March to October 2020) through a retrospective chart review. All infections were confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2. The overall mortality was 38.5% due to older age and high frequency of comorbidities in our veteran population. Only patients with known blood type were included for further analysis, reducing our cohort to 123. Demographically, this subset was mostly male (116 of 123, 94.3%) with an average age of 69.5 years, of which 73% were blacks. Fifty-four out of 123 patients died in the hospital, representing a mortality of 43.9%. Only 5.7% of the patients (seven of 123) were female, who showed a slightly increased mortality of 57.1% (four of seven patients), which may not be significant and could not be explained by a higher average age when compared with the older male subset (65 vs. 70.9 years, respectively). Due to the limited number of females in our cohort, we concentrated on the analysis of male mortality regarding blood type, which was as follows: 66.7% (two of three patients) for A-negative, 44.4% (11 of 25 patients) for A-positive, 100% (one of one patient) for AB-negative, 44.4% (four of nine patients) for AB-positive, 0% (zero of three patients) for B-negative, 42.9% (six of 14 patients) for B-positive, 0% (zero of one patient) for O-negative and 39.0% (23 of 58 patients) for O-positive. Statistical analysis using Fisher exact test comparing all possible combinations, revealed no significant differences associated with ABO blood type (A vs. AB P = 1, A vs. B P = 0.3771, A vs. O P = 0.5072, B vs. O P = 0.7625, AB vs. O P = 0.5096 and AB vs. B P = 0.4384) or the Rhesus (Rh) factor (Avs. A+ P = 0.3326, ABvs. AB+ P = 1, Bvs. B+ P = 0.5167, Bvs. B+ P = 0.5167, Ovs. O+ P = 1, combined Rhvs. Rh+ P = 1). In summary, an association between blood type and COVID-19 mortality was absent in a predominantly black male population hospitalized at our institution, in agreement with previous reports analyzing mostly Northern European patients [3, 4]. Further research with larger cohorts, including diverse variables (genetic profiling and viral strain analysis) is necessary to prognosticate COVID-19 severity.","PeriodicalId":15964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hematology","volume":"11 3","pages":"121-122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/61/jh-11-121.PMC9275439.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ABO Blood Group Association With COVID-19 Mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Hira Akhlaq, Parastou Tizro, Anita Aggarwal, Victor E Nava\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/jh993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We were intrigued by the conclusion of Kumar et al [1] that once patients are hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, blood type is not associated with severe disease or in-hospital mortality. During this global pandemic controversial data have been published on this topic. Initial studies suggested that the lethality risk was increased or decreased with blood type A and O, respectively [2]. However, subsequent multivariate analysis found no association between blood type and risk of intubation or death after COVID-19 infection [3]. Furthermore, a large study with more than 11,000 predominantly white race (83%) individuals concluded that ABO groups were not associated with disease susceptibility or severity and were unlikely to be useful predictors of COVID-19 severity in similar ancestries, raising the importance of extending these observations to more diverse populations [4]. Of interest, Apea et al recently demonstrated higher mortality in patients from Asian and black backgrounds during COVID-19 infection after controlling for obvious confounders and frailty [5]. In the Washington, DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, we are strategically situated to further investigate the outcomes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2) infection in blacks since they represent approximately 60% of our patients. After Institutional Review Board approval, we followed 201 patients requiring hospitalization due to COVID-19 infection during 7 consecutive months (March to October 2020) through a retrospective chart review. All infections were confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2. The overall mortality was 38.5% due to older age and high frequency of comorbidities in our veteran population. Only patients with known blood type were included for further analysis, reducing our cohort to 123. Demographically, this subset was mostly male (116 of 123, 94.3%) with an average age of 69.5 years, of which 73% were blacks. Fifty-four out of 123 patients died in the hospital, representing a mortality of 43.9%. Only 5.7% of the patients (seven of 123) were female, who showed a slightly increased mortality of 57.1% (four of seven patients), which may not be significant and could not be explained by a higher average age when compared with the older male subset (65 vs. 70.9 years, respectively). Due to the limited number of females in our cohort, we concentrated on the analysis of male mortality regarding blood type, which was as follows: 66.7% (two of three patients) for A-negative, 44.4% (11 of 25 patients) for A-positive, 100% (one of one patient) for AB-negative, 44.4% (four of nine patients) for AB-positive, 0% (zero of three patients) for B-negative, 42.9% (six of 14 patients) for B-positive, 0% (zero of one patient) for O-negative and 39.0% (23 of 58 patients) for O-positive. Statistical analysis using Fisher exact test comparing all possible combinations, revealed no significant differences associated with ABO blood type (A vs. AB P = 1, A vs. B P = 0.3771, A vs. O P = 0.5072, B vs. O P = 0.7625, AB vs. O P = 0.5096 and AB vs. B P = 0.4384) or the Rhesus (Rh) factor (Avs. A+ P = 0.3326, ABvs. AB+ P = 1, Bvs. B+ P = 0.5167, Bvs. B+ P = 0.5167, Ovs. O+ P = 1, combined Rhvs. Rh+ P = 1). In summary, an association between blood type and COVID-19 mortality was absent in a predominantly black male population hospitalized at our institution, in agreement with previous reports analyzing mostly Northern European patients [3, 4]. Further research with larger cohorts, including diverse variables (genetic profiling and viral strain analysis) is necessary to prognosticate COVID-19 severity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hematology\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"121-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/61/jh-11-121.PMC9275439.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/jh993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jh993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ABO Blood Group Association With COVID-19 Mortality.
We were intrigued by the conclusion of Kumar et al [1] that once patients are hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, blood type is not associated with severe disease or in-hospital mortality. During this global pandemic controversial data have been published on this topic. Initial studies suggested that the lethality risk was increased or decreased with blood type A and O, respectively [2]. However, subsequent multivariate analysis found no association between blood type and risk of intubation or death after COVID-19 infection [3]. Furthermore, a large study with more than 11,000 predominantly white race (83%) individuals concluded that ABO groups were not associated with disease susceptibility or severity and were unlikely to be useful predictors of COVID-19 severity in similar ancestries, raising the importance of extending these observations to more diverse populations [4]. Of interest, Apea et al recently demonstrated higher mortality in patients from Asian and black backgrounds during COVID-19 infection after controlling for obvious confounders and frailty [5]. In the Washington, DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, we are strategically situated to further investigate the outcomes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2) infection in blacks since they represent approximately 60% of our patients. After Institutional Review Board approval, we followed 201 patients requiring hospitalization due to COVID-19 infection during 7 consecutive months (March to October 2020) through a retrospective chart review. All infections were confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2. The overall mortality was 38.5% due to older age and high frequency of comorbidities in our veteran population. Only patients with known blood type were included for further analysis, reducing our cohort to 123. Demographically, this subset was mostly male (116 of 123, 94.3%) with an average age of 69.5 years, of which 73% were blacks. Fifty-four out of 123 patients died in the hospital, representing a mortality of 43.9%. Only 5.7% of the patients (seven of 123) were female, who showed a slightly increased mortality of 57.1% (four of seven patients), which may not be significant and could not be explained by a higher average age when compared with the older male subset (65 vs. 70.9 years, respectively). Due to the limited number of females in our cohort, we concentrated on the analysis of male mortality regarding blood type, which was as follows: 66.7% (two of three patients) for A-negative, 44.4% (11 of 25 patients) for A-positive, 100% (one of one patient) for AB-negative, 44.4% (four of nine patients) for AB-positive, 0% (zero of three patients) for B-negative, 42.9% (six of 14 patients) for B-positive, 0% (zero of one patient) for O-negative and 39.0% (23 of 58 patients) for O-positive. Statistical analysis using Fisher exact test comparing all possible combinations, revealed no significant differences associated with ABO blood type (A vs. AB P = 1, A vs. B P = 0.3771, A vs. O P = 0.5072, B vs. O P = 0.7625, AB vs. O P = 0.5096 and AB vs. B P = 0.4384) or the Rhesus (Rh) factor (Avs. A+ P = 0.3326, ABvs. AB+ P = 1, Bvs. B+ P = 0.5167, Bvs. B+ P = 0.5167, Ovs. O+ P = 1, combined Rhvs. Rh+ P = 1). In summary, an association between blood type and COVID-19 mortality was absent in a predominantly black male population hospitalized at our institution, in agreement with previous reports analyzing mostly Northern European patients [3, 4]. Further research with larger cohorts, including diverse variables (genetic profiling and viral strain analysis) is necessary to prognosticate COVID-19 severity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of hematology
Journal of hematology HEMATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
A Case of Fulminant Cerebral Edema Leading to Death After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy. Methionine Synthase Reductase A66G Variant in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients. Optimizing Falling Drop Hemoglobin Method by Comparing Capillary Versus Venous Blood and Determining the Stability of the Copper Sulfate Solution. Retrospective Study of CD20 Expression Loss in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Sequential Use of Prednisolone and Cyclosporine Is Effective in the Management of Immunotherapy-Related Hemolytic Anemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1